The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh: An Independent Evaluation

Tamara Goriely; Paul McCrone; Peter Robert Duff; Martin Knapp; Alistair Henry; Cyrus Tata; Becki Lancaster; Avrom Sherr

The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh: An Independent Evaluation

Tamara Goriely, Paul McCrone, Peter Robert Duff^*, Martin Knapp, Alistair Henry, Cyrus Tata, Becki Lancaster, Avrom Sherr

^*Corresponding author for this work

Law

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned Report

Abstract

The Public Defence Solicitors' Office (PDSO) was established in Edinburgh on 1 October1998. The enabling legislation required that it be formally evaluated, and a report presented to Parliament within three years. Research was therefore commissioned to compare criminal defence services delivered through the PDSO with those delivered through private practice solicitors under the legal aid scheme. The comparison was undertaken with reference to four criteria:
• cost-effectiveness
• the quality of services provided
• client satisfaction, and
• the contribution of each delivery method to the efficiency of the criminal justice system, including the impact on the courts, the Procurator Fiscal service, the police and the judiciary.
This study was confined to representation in summary proceedings (that is, proceedings without a jury). During the period of the study, the Office did not undertake solemn work, before a judge and jury.

Original language	English
Place of Publication	Edinburgh
Publisher	Scottish Executive Central Research Unit
Number of pages	270
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2001

Keywords

public defence
solicitors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Cite this

@book{9f626ef6e71e4af3b1fcd7794a876837,

title = "The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh: An Independent Evaluation",

abstract = "The Public Defence Solicitors' Office (PDSO) was established in Edinburgh on 1 October1998. The enabling legislation required that it be formally evaluated, and a report presented to Parliament within three years. Research was therefore commissioned to compare criminal defence services delivered through the PDSO with those delivered through private practice solicitors under the legal aid scheme. The comparison was undertaken with reference to four criteria:• cost-effectiveness• the quality of services provided• client satisfaction, and• the contribution of each delivery method to the efficiency of the criminal justice system, including the impact on the courts, the Procurator Fiscal service, the police and the judiciary.This study was confined to representation in summary proceedings (that is, proceedings without a jury). During the period of the study, the Office did not undertake solemn work, before a judge and jury.",

keywords = "public defence, solicitors",

author = "Tamara Goriely and Paul McCrone and Duff, {Peter Robert} and Martin Knapp and Alistair Henry and Cyrus Tata and Becki Lancaster and Avrom Sherr",

year = "2001",

month = sep,

day = "1",

language = "English",

publisher = "Scottish Executive Central Research Unit",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh

T2 - An Independent Evaluation

AU - Goriely, Tamara

AU - McCrone, Paul

AU - Duff, Peter Robert

AU - Knapp, Martin

AU - Henry, Alistair

AU - Tata, Cyrus

AU - Lancaster, Becki

AU - Sherr, Avrom

PY - 2001/9/1

Y1 - 2001/9/1

N2 - The Public Defence Solicitors' Office (PDSO) was established in Edinburgh on 1 October1998. The enabling legislation required that it be formally evaluated, and a report presented to Parliament within three years. Research was therefore commissioned to compare criminal defence services delivered through the PDSO with those delivered through private practice solicitors under the legal aid scheme. The comparison was undertaken with reference to four criteria:• cost-effectiveness• the quality of services provided• client satisfaction, and• the contribution of each delivery method to the efficiency of the criminal justice system, including the impact on the courts, the Procurator Fiscal service, the police and the judiciary.This study was confined to representation in summary proceedings (that is, proceedings without a jury). During the period of the study, the Office did not undertake solemn work, before a judge and jury.

AB - The Public Defence Solicitors' Office (PDSO) was established in Edinburgh on 1 October1998. The enabling legislation required that it be formally evaluated, and a report presented to Parliament within three years. Research was therefore commissioned to compare criminal defence services delivered through the PDSO with those delivered through private practice solicitors under the legal aid scheme. The comparison was undertaken with reference to four criteria:• cost-effectiveness• the quality of services provided• client satisfaction, and• the contribution of each delivery method to the efficiency of the criminal justice system, including the impact on the courts, the Procurator Fiscal service, the police and the judiciary.This study was confined to representation in summary proceedings (that is, proceedings without a jury). During the period of the study, the Office did not undertake solemn work, before a judge and jury.

KW - public defence

KW - solicitors

UR - https://www.academia.edu/25349791/The_public_defender_solicitors_office_in_Edinburgh_an_independent_evaluation

M3 - Commissioned Report

BT - The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh

PB - Scottish Executive Central Research Unit

CY - Edinburgh

ER -

The Public Defence Solicitors' Office in Edinburgh: An Independent Evaluation

Abstract

Keywords

UN SDGs

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this