The relative efficiency of two commercial live-traps for small mammals

X Lambin, J MacKinnon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Data obtained from live-trapping a population of field voles, Microtus agrestis, over a seven-month period was used to compare the trapping efficiencies of the Longworth and the Ugglan Mouse Special traps. The Ugglan mouse Special is a cheaper alternative that is widely used in Scandinavia. Biases in the sex or age of captured animals were the same for both types of trap and the total numbers of captures were similar. There was no evidence that individual animals a ere more likely to be captured in the same type of trap at each capture session. We conclude that the Ugglan Mouse Special trap is a practical alternative to the Longworth trap for studies of small mammals by capture-mark-recapture techniques.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-404
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Zoology
Volume242
Publication statusPublished - Jun 1997

Cite this

The relative efficiency of two commercial live-traps for small mammals. / Lambin, X ; MacKinnon, J .

In: Journal of Zoology, Vol. 242, 06.1997, p. 400-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58bff3da47f54814805aba0b19502522,
title = "The relative efficiency of two commercial live-traps for small mammals",
abstract = "Data obtained from live-trapping a population of field voles, Microtus agrestis, over a seven-month period was used to compare the trapping efficiencies of the Longworth and the Ugglan Mouse Special traps. The Ugglan mouse Special is a cheaper alternative that is widely used in Scandinavia. Biases in the sex or age of captured animals were the same for both types of trap and the total numbers of captures were similar. There was no evidence that individual animals a ere more likely to be captured in the same type of trap at each capture session. We conclude that the Ugglan Mouse Special trap is a practical alternative to the Longworth trap for studies of small mammals by capture-mark-recapture techniques.",
author = "X Lambin and J MacKinnon",
year = "1997",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "242",
pages = "400--404",
journal = "Journal of Zoology",
issn = "0952-8369",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relative efficiency of two commercial live-traps for small mammals

AU - Lambin, X

AU - MacKinnon, J

PY - 1997/6

Y1 - 1997/6

N2 - Data obtained from live-trapping a population of field voles, Microtus agrestis, over a seven-month period was used to compare the trapping efficiencies of the Longworth and the Ugglan Mouse Special traps. The Ugglan mouse Special is a cheaper alternative that is widely used in Scandinavia. Biases in the sex or age of captured animals were the same for both types of trap and the total numbers of captures were similar. There was no evidence that individual animals a ere more likely to be captured in the same type of trap at each capture session. We conclude that the Ugglan Mouse Special trap is a practical alternative to the Longworth trap for studies of small mammals by capture-mark-recapture techniques.

AB - Data obtained from live-trapping a population of field voles, Microtus agrestis, over a seven-month period was used to compare the trapping efficiencies of the Longworth and the Ugglan Mouse Special traps. The Ugglan mouse Special is a cheaper alternative that is widely used in Scandinavia. Biases in the sex or age of captured animals were the same for both types of trap and the total numbers of captures were similar. There was no evidence that individual animals a ere more likely to be captured in the same type of trap at each capture session. We conclude that the Ugglan Mouse Special trap is a practical alternative to the Longworth trap for studies of small mammals by capture-mark-recapture techniques.

M3 - Article

VL - 242

SP - 400

EP - 404

JO - Journal of Zoology

JF - Journal of Zoology

SN - 0952-8369

ER -