Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 331-346 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Politics Religion and Ideology |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21 Aug 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences(all)
Cite this
The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious : Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred. / May, Samantha; Wilson, Erin K.; Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia ; Sheikh, Faiz.
In: Politics Religion and Ideology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2014, p. 331-346.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious
T2 - Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred
AU - May, Samantha
AU - Wilson, Erin K.
AU - Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia
AU - Sheikh, Faiz
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.
AB - The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.
U2 - 10.1080/21567689.2014.948526
DO - 10.1080/21567689.2014.948526
M3 - Article
VL - 15
SP - 331
EP - 346
JO - Politics Religion and Ideology
JF - Politics Religion and Ideology
SN - 2156-7689
IS - 3
ER -