The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious

Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred

Samantha May, Erin K. Wilson, Claudia Baumgart-Ochse, Faiz Sheikh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-346
Number of pages16
JournalPolitics Religion and Ideology
Volume15
Issue number3
Early online date21 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Religion
globalization
politics
international relations
secularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious : Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred. / May, Samantha; Wilson, Erin K.; Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia ; Sheikh, Faiz.

In: Politics Religion and Ideology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2014, p. 331-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dab2cfbc89ab4d3fae86eea0309dec32,
title = "The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious: Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred",
abstract = "The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.",
author = "Samantha May and Wilson, {Erin K.} and Claudia Baumgart-Ochse and Faiz Sheikh",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/21567689.2014.948526",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "331--346",
journal = "Politics Religion and Ideology",
issn = "2156-7689",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious

T2 - Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred

AU - May, Samantha

AU - Wilson, Erin K.

AU - Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia

AU - Sheikh, Faiz

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.

AB - The model of secularism as the overarching framework for managing the relationship between religion and politics has come under increasing scrutiny in recent International Relations (IR) scholarship, particularly in the wake of the so-called “postsecular turn”. Where once religion was thought to be an entity that was easily identifiable, definable and largely irrelevant to politics and public life, these assumptions are being increasingly brought into question. This special issue makes a specific contribution to this recent questioning of secularism within IR by noting and interrogating the multiple ways in which the boundaries between the religious and the political blur in contemporary politics. Our contributors explore the multifarious dimensions of this critical issue by asking whether the relationship between religion and politics has taken on significant new forms and dimensions in our contemporary globalised age or if we are simply beginning to recognise a pattern that has always been present. In this introduction we canvass some of the parameters of current debates on the religious and the political. We note that there are multiple and (at times) competing understandings of such key terms as religion, secularism, secularisation and the post-secular that shape and are shaped by ongoing discussions of the relationship between religion and public life. Our goal is not to close down these important points of difference through the imposition of singular understandings. We simply wish to highlight the points of contestation that continue to be significant for how we understand (or obscure) the boundaries between the religious and the political.

U2 - 10.1080/21567689.2014.948526

DO - 10.1080/21567689.2014.948526

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 331

EP - 346

JO - Politics Religion and Ideology

JF - Politics Religion and Ideology

SN - 2156-7689

IS - 3

ER -