The Risk Free Rate of Return in UK Property Pricing

Norman Hutchison, Patricia Fraser, Alastair Adair, Rahul Srivatsa

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Purpose: The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate suitable for pricing of property investments in the UK and in doing so investigates the financial characteristics and performance of UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted.

    Design/methodology/approach: This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980 to 2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return.

    Findings: The analysis suggests that 10 year index linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then 5 year nominal appear to be more stable than 10 year nominal. 10 year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In our survey of UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the 10 year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/10 had fallen to such low level.

    Originality/value: The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)165-184
    Number of pages20
    JournalJournal of European Real Estate Research
    Volume4
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Risk-free rate
    Rate of return
    Pricing
    Property investment
    Investors
    Property market
    Maturity
    Benchmark
    Rationale
    Fund managers
    Design methodology
    Advisors
    Yield distributions
    Bidding
    Investment funds
    Questionnaire survey

    Keywords

    • Risk free rate of return
    • UK gilt yields
    • property pricing

    Cite this

    The Risk Free Rate of Return in UK Property Pricing. / Hutchison, Norman; Fraser, Patricia; Adair, Alastair; Srivatsa, Rahul .

    In: Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, p. 165-184.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Hutchison, Norman ; Fraser, Patricia ; Adair, Alastair ; Srivatsa, Rahul . / The Risk Free Rate of Return in UK Property Pricing. In: Journal of European Real Estate Research. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 165-184.
    @article{5b035794f452401bb01e59d35385633d,
    title = "The Risk Free Rate of Return in UK Property Pricing",
    abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate suitable for pricing of property investments in the UK and in doing so investigates the financial characteristics and performance of UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach: This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980 to 2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings: The analysis suggests that 10 year index linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then 5 year nominal appear to be more stable than 10 year nominal. 10 year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In our survey of UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the 10 year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/10 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value: The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.",
    keywords = "Risk free rate of return, UK gilt yields, property pricing",
    author = "Norman Hutchison and Patricia Fraser and Alastair Adair and Rahul Srivatsa",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1108/17539261111183407",
    language = "English",
    volume = "4",
    pages = "165--184",
    journal = "Journal of European Real Estate Research",
    issn = "1753-9269",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The Risk Free Rate of Return in UK Property Pricing

    AU - Hutchison, Norman

    AU - Fraser, Patricia

    AU - Adair, Alastair

    AU - Srivatsa, Rahul

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate suitable for pricing of property investments in the UK and in doing so investigates the financial characteristics and performance of UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach: This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980 to 2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings: The analysis suggests that 10 year index linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then 5 year nominal appear to be more stable than 10 year nominal. 10 year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In our survey of UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the 10 year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/10 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value: The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.

    AB - Purpose: The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate suitable for pricing of property investments in the UK and in doing so investigates the financial characteristics and performance of UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach: This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980 to 2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings: The analysis suggests that 10 year index linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then 5 year nominal appear to be more stable than 10 year nominal. 10 year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In our survey of UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the 10 year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/10 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value: The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.

    KW - Risk free rate of return

    KW - UK gilt yields

    KW - property pricing

    U2 - 10.1108/17539261111183407

    DO - 10.1108/17539261111183407

    M3 - Article

    VL - 4

    SP - 165

    EP - 184

    JO - Journal of European Real Estate Research

    JF - Journal of European Real Estate Research

    SN - 1753-9269

    IS - 3

    ER -