The role of asymmetries in rock-paper-scissors biodiversity models

André M Timpanaro, C Grebogi, Alessandro P S de Moura

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

The maintenance of biodiversity is a long standing puzzle in ecology. It is a classical result that if the interactions of the species in an ecosystem are chosen in a random way, then complex ecosystems can’t sustain
themselves, meaning that the structure of the interactions between the species must be a central component
on the preservation of biodiversity and on the stability of ecosystems. The rock-paper-scissors model is one
of the paradigmatic models that study how biodiversity is maintained. In this model 3 species dominate each
other in a cyclic way (mimicking a trophic cycle), that is, rock dominates scissors, that dominates paper, that
dominates rock. In the original version of this model, this dominance obeys a Z3 symmetry, in the sense that
the strength of dominance is always the same. In this work, we break this symmetry, studying the effects of the
addition of an asymmetry parameter. In the usual model, in a two dimensional lattice, the species distribute
themselves according to spiral patterns, that can be explained by the complex Landau-Guinzburg equation.
With the addition of asymmetry, new spatial patterns appear during the transient and the system either ends
in a state with spirals, similar to the ones of the original model, or in a state where unstable spatial patterns
dominate or in a state where only one species survives (and biodiversity is lost).
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventXXXVI Encontro Nacional de Física da Matéria Condensada - Águas de Lindóia
Duration: 13 May 201317 May 2017

Conference

ConferenceXXXVI Encontro Nacional de Física da Matéria Condensada
CityÁguas de Lindóia
Period13/05/1317/05/17

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of asymmetries in rock-paper-scissors biodiversity models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this