The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality

Pete Smith, Mike R. Ashmore, Helaina I. J. Black, Paul J. Burgess, Chris D. Evans, Timothy A. Quine, Amanda M. Thomson, Kevin Hicks, Harriet G. Orr

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

1. Ecosystems have a critical role in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality, but management to change an ecosystem process in support of one regulating ecosystem service can either provide co-benefits to other services or can result in trade-offs. 2. We examine the role of ecosystems in delivering these regulating ecosystem services, using the UK as our case study region. We identify some of the main co-benefits and trade-offs of ecosystem management within, and across, the regulating services of climate regulation, and soil, water and air quality regulation, and where relevant, we also describe interactions with other ecosystem services. Our analysis clearly identifies the many important linkages between these different ecosystem services. 3. However, soil, water and air quality regulation are often governed by different legislation or are under the jurisdiction of different regulators, which can make optimal management difficult to identify and to implement. Policies and legislation addressing air, water and soil are sometimes disconnected, with no integrated overview of how these policies interact. This can lead to conflicting messages regarding the use and management of soil, water and air. Similarly, climate change legislation is separate from that aiming to protect and enhance soil, water and air quality, leading to further potential for policy conflict. 4. All regulating services, even if they are synergistic, may trade off against other ecosystem services. At a policy level, this may well be the biggest conflict. The fact that even individual regulating services comprise multiple and contrasting indicators (e.g. the various components of water quality such as nutrient levels, acidity, pathogens and sediments), adds to the complexity of the challenge. 5. Synthesis and applications. We conclude that although there are some good examples of integrated ecosystem management, some aspects of ecosystem management could be better coordinated to deliver multiple ecosystem services, and that an ecosystem services framework to assess co-benefits and trade-offs would help regulators, policy-makers and ecosystem managers to deliver more coherent ecosystem management strategies. In this way, an ecosystem services framework may improve the regulation of climate, and soil, water and air quality, even in the absence of economic valuation of the individual services

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)812-829
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume50
Issue number4
Early online date21 Dec 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Keywords

  • co-benefit
  • ecosystem service
  • policy
  • regulating service
  • trade-off
  • tillage erosion
  • organic-matter
  • United-Kingdom
  • carbon budget
  • ozone
  • land
  • UK
  • emission
  • methane
  • productivity

Cite this

Smith, P., Ashmore, M. R., Black, H. I. J., Burgess, P. J., Evans, C. D., Quine, T. A., ... Orr, H. G. (2013). The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. Journal of Applied Ecology, 50(4), 812-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12016

The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. / Smith, Pete; Ashmore, Mike R.; Black, Helaina I. J.; Burgess, Paul J.; Evans, Chris D.; Quine, Timothy A.; Thomson, Amanda M.; Hicks, Kevin; Orr, Harriet G.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 50, No. 4, 08.2013, p. 812-829.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Smith, P, Ashmore, MR, Black, HIJ, Burgess, PJ, Evans, CD, Quine, TA, Thomson, AM, Hicks, K & Orr, HG 2013, 'The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality' Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 812-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12016
Smith, Pete ; Ashmore, Mike R. ; Black, Helaina I. J. ; Burgess, Paul J. ; Evans, Chris D. ; Quine, Timothy A. ; Thomson, Amanda M. ; Hicks, Kevin ; Orr, Harriet G. / The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2013 ; Vol. 50, No. 4. pp. 812-829.
@article{8f194709b0064ae2bdae9c8c16d06fb9,
title = "The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality",
abstract = "1. Ecosystems have a critical role in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality, but management to change an ecosystem process in support of one regulating ecosystem service can either provide co-benefits to other services or can result in trade-offs. 2. We examine the role of ecosystems in delivering these regulating ecosystem services, using the UK as our case study region. We identify some of the main co-benefits and trade-offs of ecosystem management within, and across, the regulating services of climate regulation, and soil, water and air quality regulation, and where relevant, we also describe interactions with other ecosystem services. Our analysis clearly identifies the many important linkages between these different ecosystem services. 3. However, soil, water and air quality regulation are often governed by different legislation or are under the jurisdiction of different regulators, which can make optimal management difficult to identify and to implement. Policies and legislation addressing air, water and soil are sometimes disconnected, with no integrated overview of how these policies interact. This can lead to conflicting messages regarding the use and management of soil, water and air. Similarly, climate change legislation is separate from that aiming to protect and enhance soil, water and air quality, leading to further potential for policy conflict. 4. All regulating services, even if they are synergistic, may trade off against other ecosystem services. At a policy level, this may well be the biggest conflict. The fact that even individual regulating services comprise multiple and contrasting indicators (e.g. the various components of water quality such as nutrient levels, acidity, pathogens and sediments), adds to the complexity of the challenge. 5. Synthesis and applications. We conclude that although there are some good examples of integrated ecosystem management, some aspects of ecosystem management could be better coordinated to deliver multiple ecosystem services, and that an ecosystem services framework to assess co-benefits and trade-offs would help regulators, policy-makers and ecosystem managers to deliver more coherent ecosystem management strategies. In this way, an ecosystem services framework may improve the regulation of climate, and soil, water and air quality, even in the absence of economic valuation of the individual services",
keywords = "co-benefit, ecosystem service, policy, regulating service, trade-off, tillage erosion, organic-matter, United-Kingdom, carbon budget, ozone, land, UK, emission, methane, productivity",
author = "Pete Smith and Ashmore, {Mike R.} and Black, {Helaina I. J.} and Burgess, {Paul J.} and Evans, {Chris D.} and Quine, {Timothy A.} and Thomson, {Amanda M.} and Kevin Hicks and Orr, {Harriet G.}",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1365-2664.12016",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "812--829",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of ecosystems and their management in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Ashmore, Mike R.

AU - Black, Helaina I. J.

AU - Burgess, Paul J.

AU - Evans, Chris D.

AU - Quine, Timothy A.

AU - Thomson, Amanda M.

AU - Hicks, Kevin

AU - Orr, Harriet G.

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - 1. Ecosystems have a critical role in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality, but management to change an ecosystem process in support of one regulating ecosystem service can either provide co-benefits to other services or can result in trade-offs. 2. We examine the role of ecosystems in delivering these regulating ecosystem services, using the UK as our case study region. We identify some of the main co-benefits and trade-offs of ecosystem management within, and across, the regulating services of climate regulation, and soil, water and air quality regulation, and where relevant, we also describe interactions with other ecosystem services. Our analysis clearly identifies the many important linkages between these different ecosystem services. 3. However, soil, water and air quality regulation are often governed by different legislation or are under the jurisdiction of different regulators, which can make optimal management difficult to identify and to implement. Policies and legislation addressing air, water and soil are sometimes disconnected, with no integrated overview of how these policies interact. This can lead to conflicting messages regarding the use and management of soil, water and air. Similarly, climate change legislation is separate from that aiming to protect and enhance soil, water and air quality, leading to further potential for policy conflict. 4. All regulating services, even if they are synergistic, may trade off against other ecosystem services. At a policy level, this may well be the biggest conflict. The fact that even individual regulating services comprise multiple and contrasting indicators (e.g. the various components of water quality such as nutrient levels, acidity, pathogens and sediments), adds to the complexity of the challenge. 5. Synthesis and applications. We conclude that although there are some good examples of integrated ecosystem management, some aspects of ecosystem management could be better coordinated to deliver multiple ecosystem services, and that an ecosystem services framework to assess co-benefits and trade-offs would help regulators, policy-makers and ecosystem managers to deliver more coherent ecosystem management strategies. In this way, an ecosystem services framework may improve the regulation of climate, and soil, water and air quality, even in the absence of economic valuation of the individual services

AB - 1. Ecosystems have a critical role in regulating climate, and soil, water and air quality, but management to change an ecosystem process in support of one regulating ecosystem service can either provide co-benefits to other services or can result in trade-offs. 2. We examine the role of ecosystems in delivering these regulating ecosystem services, using the UK as our case study region. We identify some of the main co-benefits and trade-offs of ecosystem management within, and across, the regulating services of climate regulation, and soil, water and air quality regulation, and where relevant, we also describe interactions with other ecosystem services. Our analysis clearly identifies the many important linkages between these different ecosystem services. 3. However, soil, water and air quality regulation are often governed by different legislation or are under the jurisdiction of different regulators, which can make optimal management difficult to identify and to implement. Policies and legislation addressing air, water and soil are sometimes disconnected, with no integrated overview of how these policies interact. This can lead to conflicting messages regarding the use and management of soil, water and air. Similarly, climate change legislation is separate from that aiming to protect and enhance soil, water and air quality, leading to further potential for policy conflict. 4. All regulating services, even if they are synergistic, may trade off against other ecosystem services. At a policy level, this may well be the biggest conflict. The fact that even individual regulating services comprise multiple and contrasting indicators (e.g. the various components of water quality such as nutrient levels, acidity, pathogens and sediments), adds to the complexity of the challenge. 5. Synthesis and applications. We conclude that although there are some good examples of integrated ecosystem management, some aspects of ecosystem management could be better coordinated to deliver multiple ecosystem services, and that an ecosystem services framework to assess co-benefits and trade-offs would help regulators, policy-makers and ecosystem managers to deliver more coherent ecosystem management strategies. In this way, an ecosystem services framework may improve the regulation of climate, and soil, water and air quality, even in the absence of economic valuation of the individual services

KW - co-benefit

KW - ecosystem service

KW - policy

KW - regulating service

KW - trade-off

KW - tillage erosion

KW - organic-matter

KW - United-Kingdom

KW - carbon budget

KW - ozone

KW - land

KW - UK

KW - emission

KW - methane

KW - productivity

U2 - 10.1111/1365-2664.12016

DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.12016

M3 - Literature review

VL - 50

SP - 812

EP - 829

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 4

ER -