The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe

Pia Gottschalk, Martin Wattenbach, A. Neftel, J. Fuhrer, M. Jones, G. Lanigan, P. Davis, C. Campbell, J.-F. Soussana, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecosystem models are used to explore scientific questions and as a means of decision support. It is therefore essential to assess the quality of the outputs from these. One important measure of quality of model outputs is their uncertainty that arise from uncertainties in measurements. In this study, uncertainty associated with simulation of NEE (net ecosystem exchange) by the PaSim (pasture simulation model) model was tested at four grassland sites. The effect of measurement uncertainties in the main input factors for climate (temperature, precipitation, global radiation), atmospheric CO2 concentration, soil characteristics (bulk density, clay fraction, pH, carbon content of different pools), and management (N input) on output uncertainty of NEE prediction was explored. Monte Carlo runs were performed for 2 years, 2002 and 2003. using Latin Hypercube sampling from probability density functions (PDF) for each input factor. Global uncertainty, represented by the standard deviation of the NEE estimates, was generally higher in 2003 than in 2002 per site with full data records for both years. There was considerable variation in global uncertainty from site to site and between years. These results indicate that output uncertainty does not depend solely on absolute input uncertainties. The mean NEE of the global uncertainty distribution was also different from the NEE result of the single model run using the default set of input factors. The results clearly indicate the dependency of factor importance and uncertainty in model simulations on the environmental conditions of the system under study. One indication is that more environmentally constrained systems produce higher uncertainties in model results. We conclude that any application of the model within decision support should be accompanied by a case specific uncertainty analysis presenting the mean of the output distribution as model results. The consequences of these findings for the application of PaSim at the continental scale are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-185
Number of pages11
JournalAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Volume121
Issue number1-2
Early online date2 Feb 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Keywords

  • uncertainty
  • grassland
  • ecosystem model
  • Monte Carlo
  • organic-carbon storage
  • climate-change
  • parameter sensitivity
  • model
  • sequestration
  • management
  • emissions
  • fluxes
  • nitrogen
  • pasture

Cite this

The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe. / Gottschalk, Pia; Wattenbach, Martin; Neftel, A.; Fuhrer, J.; Jones, M.; Lanigan, G.; Davis, P.; Campbell, C.; Soussana, J.-F. ; Smith, Pete.

In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 121, No. 1-2, 06.2007, p. 175-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gottschalk, P, Wattenbach, M, Neftel, A, Fuhrer, J, Jones, M, Lanigan, G, Davis, P, Campbell, C, Soussana, J-F & Smith, P 2007, 'The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe', Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, vol. 121, no. 1-2, pp. 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.026
Gottschalk, Pia ; Wattenbach, Martin ; Neftel, A. ; Fuhrer, J. ; Jones, M. ; Lanigan, G. ; Davis, P. ; Campbell, C. ; Soussana, J.-F. ; Smith, Pete. / The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe. In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2007 ; Vol. 121, No. 1-2. pp. 175-185.
@article{098f93ae40864e3fa167be4200b5db14,
title = "The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe",
abstract = "Ecosystem models are used to explore scientific questions and as a means of decision support. It is therefore essential to assess the quality of the outputs from these. One important measure of quality of model outputs is their uncertainty that arise from uncertainties in measurements. In this study, uncertainty associated with simulation of NEE (net ecosystem exchange) by the PaSim (pasture simulation model) model was tested at four grassland sites. The effect of measurement uncertainties in the main input factors for climate (temperature, precipitation, global radiation), atmospheric CO2 concentration, soil characteristics (bulk density, clay fraction, pH, carbon content of different pools), and management (N input) on output uncertainty of NEE prediction was explored. Monte Carlo runs were performed for 2 years, 2002 and 2003. using Latin Hypercube sampling from probability density functions (PDF) for each input factor. Global uncertainty, represented by the standard deviation of the NEE estimates, was generally higher in 2003 than in 2002 per site with full data records for both years. There was considerable variation in global uncertainty from site to site and between years. These results indicate that output uncertainty does not depend solely on absolute input uncertainties. The mean NEE of the global uncertainty distribution was also different from the NEE result of the single model run using the default set of input factors. The results clearly indicate the dependency of factor importance and uncertainty in model simulations on the environmental conditions of the system under study. One indication is that more environmentally constrained systems produce higher uncertainties in model results. We conclude that any application of the model within decision support should be accompanied by a case specific uncertainty analysis presenting the mean of the output distribution as model results. The consequences of these findings for the application of PaSim at the continental scale are discussed.",
keywords = "uncertainty, grassland, ecosystem model, Monte Carlo, organic-carbon storage, climate-change, parameter sensitivity, model, sequestration, management, emissions, fluxes, nitrogen, pasture",
author = "Pia Gottschalk and Martin Wattenbach and A. Neftel and J. Fuhrer and M. Jones and G. Lanigan and P. Davis and C. Campbell and J.-F. Soussana and Pete Smith",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.026",
language = "English",
volume = "121",
pages = "175--185",
journal = "Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of measurement uncertainties for the simulation of grassland net ecosystem exchange (NEE) in Europe

AU - Gottschalk, Pia

AU - Wattenbach, Martin

AU - Neftel, A.

AU - Fuhrer, J.

AU - Jones, M.

AU - Lanigan, G.

AU - Davis, P.

AU - Campbell, C.

AU - Soussana, J.-F.

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Ecosystem models are used to explore scientific questions and as a means of decision support. It is therefore essential to assess the quality of the outputs from these. One important measure of quality of model outputs is their uncertainty that arise from uncertainties in measurements. In this study, uncertainty associated with simulation of NEE (net ecosystem exchange) by the PaSim (pasture simulation model) model was tested at four grassland sites. The effect of measurement uncertainties in the main input factors for climate (temperature, precipitation, global radiation), atmospheric CO2 concentration, soil characteristics (bulk density, clay fraction, pH, carbon content of different pools), and management (N input) on output uncertainty of NEE prediction was explored. Monte Carlo runs were performed for 2 years, 2002 and 2003. using Latin Hypercube sampling from probability density functions (PDF) for each input factor. Global uncertainty, represented by the standard deviation of the NEE estimates, was generally higher in 2003 than in 2002 per site with full data records for both years. There was considerable variation in global uncertainty from site to site and between years. These results indicate that output uncertainty does not depend solely on absolute input uncertainties. The mean NEE of the global uncertainty distribution was also different from the NEE result of the single model run using the default set of input factors. The results clearly indicate the dependency of factor importance and uncertainty in model simulations on the environmental conditions of the system under study. One indication is that more environmentally constrained systems produce higher uncertainties in model results. We conclude that any application of the model within decision support should be accompanied by a case specific uncertainty analysis presenting the mean of the output distribution as model results. The consequences of these findings for the application of PaSim at the continental scale are discussed.

AB - Ecosystem models are used to explore scientific questions and as a means of decision support. It is therefore essential to assess the quality of the outputs from these. One important measure of quality of model outputs is their uncertainty that arise from uncertainties in measurements. In this study, uncertainty associated with simulation of NEE (net ecosystem exchange) by the PaSim (pasture simulation model) model was tested at four grassland sites. The effect of measurement uncertainties in the main input factors for climate (temperature, precipitation, global radiation), atmospheric CO2 concentration, soil characteristics (bulk density, clay fraction, pH, carbon content of different pools), and management (N input) on output uncertainty of NEE prediction was explored. Monte Carlo runs were performed for 2 years, 2002 and 2003. using Latin Hypercube sampling from probability density functions (PDF) for each input factor. Global uncertainty, represented by the standard deviation of the NEE estimates, was generally higher in 2003 than in 2002 per site with full data records for both years. There was considerable variation in global uncertainty from site to site and between years. These results indicate that output uncertainty does not depend solely on absolute input uncertainties. The mean NEE of the global uncertainty distribution was also different from the NEE result of the single model run using the default set of input factors. The results clearly indicate the dependency of factor importance and uncertainty in model simulations on the environmental conditions of the system under study. One indication is that more environmentally constrained systems produce higher uncertainties in model results. We conclude that any application of the model within decision support should be accompanied by a case specific uncertainty analysis presenting the mean of the output distribution as model results. The consequences of these findings for the application of PaSim at the continental scale are discussed.

KW - uncertainty

KW - grassland

KW - ecosystem model

KW - Monte Carlo

KW - organic-carbon storage

KW - climate-change

KW - parameter sensitivity

KW - model

KW - sequestration

KW - management

KW - emissions

KW - fluxes

KW - nitrogen

KW - pasture

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.026

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.026

M3 - Article

VL - 121

SP - 175

EP - 185

JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 1-2

ER -