The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies

Geertje Schuitema, Linda Steg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generally, pricing policies are believed to be effective in reducing problems of massive car use. However, pricing policies are not easily implemented, as they are hardly acceptable to the public. Studies indicate that revenue allocation is important for the acceptability of transport pricing. However, this has never systematically been examined. In the present study, revenue allocation is systematically examined, using between-subjects and within-subjects designs. Results revealed that transport pricing is more acceptable if revenues are allocated to the transport system instead of to general public funds. The between-subjects designs revealed that investing revenues in road infrastructure was hardly acceptable, while this type of revenue allocation was evaluated more favourably when following a within-subjects design. This suggests that the chosen design should dovetail with the aim or the study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)221-231
Number of pages11
JournalTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date14 Jan 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008

Fingerprint

pricing
revenue
Costs and Cost Analysis
Costs
Financial Management
transport system
Railroad cars
road
infrastructure

Keywords

  • transport pricing
  • revenue use
  • acceptability

Cite this

The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies. / Schuitema, Geertje; Steg, Linda.

In: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 11, No. 3, 05.2008, p. 221-231.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{178792c7a472468dad713f482db3deaf,
title = "The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies",
abstract = "Generally, pricing policies are believed to be effective in reducing problems of massive car use. However, pricing policies are not easily implemented, as they are hardly acceptable to the public. Studies indicate that revenue allocation is important for the acceptability of transport pricing. However, this has never systematically been examined. In the present study, revenue allocation is systematically examined, using between-subjects and within-subjects designs. Results revealed that transport pricing is more acceptable if revenues are allocated to the transport system instead of to general public funds. The between-subjects designs revealed that investing revenues in road infrastructure was hardly acceptable, while this type of revenue allocation was evaluated more favourably when following a within-subjects design. This suggests that the chosen design should dovetail with the aim or the study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "transport pricing, revenue use, acceptability",
author = "Geertje Schuitema and Linda Steg",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.trf.2007.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "221--231",
journal = "Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour",
issn = "1369-8478",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies

AU - Schuitema, Geertje

AU - Steg, Linda

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - Generally, pricing policies are believed to be effective in reducing problems of massive car use. However, pricing policies are not easily implemented, as they are hardly acceptable to the public. Studies indicate that revenue allocation is important for the acceptability of transport pricing. However, this has never systematically been examined. In the present study, revenue allocation is systematically examined, using between-subjects and within-subjects designs. Results revealed that transport pricing is more acceptable if revenues are allocated to the transport system instead of to general public funds. The between-subjects designs revealed that investing revenues in road infrastructure was hardly acceptable, while this type of revenue allocation was evaluated more favourably when following a within-subjects design. This suggests that the chosen design should dovetail with the aim or the study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Generally, pricing policies are believed to be effective in reducing problems of massive car use. However, pricing policies are not easily implemented, as they are hardly acceptable to the public. Studies indicate that revenue allocation is important for the acceptability of transport pricing. However, this has never systematically been examined. In the present study, revenue allocation is systematically examined, using between-subjects and within-subjects designs. Results revealed that transport pricing is more acceptable if revenues are allocated to the transport system instead of to general public funds. The between-subjects designs revealed that investing revenues in road infrastructure was hardly acceptable, while this type of revenue allocation was evaluated more favourably when following a within-subjects design. This suggests that the chosen design should dovetail with the aim or the study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - transport pricing

KW - revenue use

KW - acceptability

U2 - 10.1016/j.trf.2007.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.trf.2007.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 221

EP - 231

JO - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

JF - Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

SN - 1369-8478

IS - 3

ER -