The role of science in environmental policy: an examination of the local context

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nature conservation in the UK has relied heavily on science to justify the selection and management of protected areas. Despite apparent movement towards sustainability rhetoric, and a downplaying of scientific expertise, scientific guidelines continue to drive protected area designation. This paper reports on interview-based research in northern Scotland with stakeholders around designated nature conservation sites, and records views on the roles of scientific and local knowledge. This demonstrates the way in which scientific knowledge acts to reduce opportunities for debate, and ways in which local knowledge is used as a form of resistance. It is concluded that the focus on science can exacerbate conflict between conservation organisations and landowners, and that efforts to work with broader definitions of value, which generate popular appeal, must be developed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)161-169
Number of pages9
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume23
Issue number2
Early online date1 Dec 2004
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Keywords

  • protected areas
  • local knowledge
  • Scotland
  • conservation
  • controversy
  • ecology
  • farmers

Cite this

The role of science in environmental policy : an examination of the local context. / Johnston, E ; Soulsby, Christopher.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 23, No. 2, 02.2006, p. 161-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{21719192910d406f9a5c266c09fed19c,
title = "The role of science in environmental policy: an examination of the local context",
abstract = "Nature conservation in the UK has relied heavily on science to justify the selection and management of protected areas. Despite apparent movement towards sustainability rhetoric, and a downplaying of scientific expertise, scientific guidelines continue to drive protected area designation. This paper reports on interview-based research in northern Scotland with stakeholders around designated nature conservation sites, and records views on the roles of scientific and local knowledge. This demonstrates the way in which scientific knowledge acts to reduce opportunities for debate, and ways in which local knowledge is used as a form of resistance. It is concluded that the focus on science can exacerbate conflict between conservation organisations and landowners, and that efforts to work with broader definitions of value, which generate popular appeal, must be developed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "protected areas, local knowledge, Scotland, conservation, controversy, ecology, farmers",
author = "E Johnston and Christopher Soulsby",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "161--169",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "ELSEVIER APPL SCI PUBL LTD",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of science in environmental policy

T2 - an examination of the local context

AU - Johnston, E

AU - Soulsby, Christopher

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - Nature conservation in the UK has relied heavily on science to justify the selection and management of protected areas. Despite apparent movement towards sustainability rhetoric, and a downplaying of scientific expertise, scientific guidelines continue to drive protected area designation. This paper reports on interview-based research in northern Scotland with stakeholders around designated nature conservation sites, and records views on the roles of scientific and local knowledge. This demonstrates the way in which scientific knowledge acts to reduce opportunities for debate, and ways in which local knowledge is used as a form of resistance. It is concluded that the focus on science can exacerbate conflict between conservation organisations and landowners, and that efforts to work with broader definitions of value, which generate popular appeal, must be developed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Nature conservation in the UK has relied heavily on science to justify the selection and management of protected areas. Despite apparent movement towards sustainability rhetoric, and a downplaying of scientific expertise, scientific guidelines continue to drive protected area designation. This paper reports on interview-based research in northern Scotland with stakeholders around designated nature conservation sites, and records views on the roles of scientific and local knowledge. This demonstrates the way in which scientific knowledge acts to reduce opportunities for debate, and ways in which local knowledge is used as a form of resistance. It is concluded that the focus on science can exacerbate conflict between conservation organisations and landowners, and that efforts to work with broader definitions of value, which generate popular appeal, must be developed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - protected areas

KW - local knowledge

KW - Scotland

KW - conservation

KW - controversy

KW - ecology

KW - farmers

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 161

EP - 169

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 2

ER -