The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation: The mixed blessing of critical habitat

Rob Williams, David Lusseau, Philip S. Hammond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Protected areas are often proposed as tools for conserving endangered populations of marine megafauna. Our study area includes a voluntary no-entry reserve embedded within wider critical habitat for Threatened 'northern resident' killer whales under Canada's Species at Risk Act. Our study quantified the reserve's importance to whales by assessing habitat preference in a behavioural context, and population-level implications of that preference given threats from human activities, such as oil spills resulting from shipping traffic. We recorded summertime activities of whales from 1995 to 2002. Whales were observed on 397 of 530 (74.9%) days. Whales showed strong preference for the reserve over adjacent waters, and used it preferentially for feeding and beach-rubbing. While the area comprises similar to 0.001% of the whales' range, an overall average of 6.5% of the population was present each day Frequently, >50% of this small population was aggregated in the restricted and heavily trafficked waterway of Johnstone Strait. Using the Potential Biological Removal equation, we calculated potential annual mortality limits (ML) of 2.2 animals. Mean group size in the area exceeded ML on 55.8% of days overall, and 98.8% of days when conditioning on whale presence. The whales' high reliance on a trivial fraction of their range means that opportunities are routine for one stochastic, catastrophic event to cause population decline. On 20 August 2007, a barge loaded with similar to 10,000 L of diesel sank in the area, exposing 25% of the population. This underscores the importance of identifying critical habitat for threatened populations, and ensuring meaningful protection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)709-719
Number of pages11
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume142
Issue number4
Early online date23 Jan 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Keywords

  • Cetacean
  • Extinction
  • Marine mammal
  • Marine protected area
  • Oil spill
  • Reserve
  • Sociality
  • Bottle-nosed dolphins
  • Orcinus-orca
  • Anthropogenic mortality
  • British-Columbia
  • Potential limits
  • Management
  • Cetaceans
  • Behavior
  • Impacts
  • Abundance

Cite this

The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation : The mixed blessing of critical habitat. / Williams, Rob; Lusseau, David; Hammond, Philip S.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 142, No. 4, 04.2009, p. 709-719.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{990e9bb731b7492394e30aca2b7e64fa,
title = "The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation: The mixed blessing of critical habitat",
abstract = "Protected areas are often proposed as tools for conserving endangered populations of marine megafauna. Our study area includes a voluntary no-entry reserve embedded within wider critical habitat for Threatened 'northern resident' killer whales under Canada's Species at Risk Act. Our study quantified the reserve's importance to whales by assessing habitat preference in a behavioural context, and population-level implications of that preference given threats from human activities, such as oil spills resulting from shipping traffic. We recorded summertime activities of whales from 1995 to 2002. Whales were observed on 397 of 530 (74.9{\%}) days. Whales showed strong preference for the reserve over adjacent waters, and used it preferentially for feeding and beach-rubbing. While the area comprises similar to 0.001{\%} of the whales' range, an overall average of 6.5{\%} of the population was present each day Frequently, >50{\%} of this small population was aggregated in the restricted and heavily trafficked waterway of Johnstone Strait. Using the Potential Biological Removal equation, we calculated potential annual mortality limits (ML) of 2.2 animals. Mean group size in the area exceeded ML on 55.8{\%} of days overall, and 98.8{\%} of days when conditioning on whale presence. The whales' high reliance on a trivial fraction of their range means that opportunities are routine for one stochastic, catastrophic event to cause population decline. On 20 August 2007, a barge loaded with similar to 10,000 L of diesel sank in the area, exposing 25{\%} of the population. This underscores the importance of identifying critical habitat for threatened populations, and ensuring meaningful protection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Cetacean, Extinction, Marine mammal, Marine protected area, Oil spill, Reserve, Sociality, Bottle-nosed dolphins, Orcinus-orca, Anthropogenic mortality, British-Columbia, Potential limits, Management, Cetaceans, Behavior, Impacts, Abundance",
author = "Rob Williams and David Lusseau and Hammond, {Philip S.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.004",
language = "English",
volume = "142",
pages = "709--719",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of social aggregations and protected areas in killer whale conservation

T2 - The mixed blessing of critical habitat

AU - Williams, Rob

AU - Lusseau, David

AU - Hammond, Philip S.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Protected areas are often proposed as tools for conserving endangered populations of marine megafauna. Our study area includes a voluntary no-entry reserve embedded within wider critical habitat for Threatened 'northern resident' killer whales under Canada's Species at Risk Act. Our study quantified the reserve's importance to whales by assessing habitat preference in a behavioural context, and population-level implications of that preference given threats from human activities, such as oil spills resulting from shipping traffic. We recorded summertime activities of whales from 1995 to 2002. Whales were observed on 397 of 530 (74.9%) days. Whales showed strong preference for the reserve over adjacent waters, and used it preferentially for feeding and beach-rubbing. While the area comprises similar to 0.001% of the whales' range, an overall average of 6.5% of the population was present each day Frequently, >50% of this small population was aggregated in the restricted and heavily trafficked waterway of Johnstone Strait. Using the Potential Biological Removal equation, we calculated potential annual mortality limits (ML) of 2.2 animals. Mean group size in the area exceeded ML on 55.8% of days overall, and 98.8% of days when conditioning on whale presence. The whales' high reliance on a trivial fraction of their range means that opportunities are routine for one stochastic, catastrophic event to cause population decline. On 20 August 2007, a barge loaded with similar to 10,000 L of diesel sank in the area, exposing 25% of the population. This underscores the importance of identifying critical habitat for threatened populations, and ensuring meaningful protection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Protected areas are often proposed as tools for conserving endangered populations of marine megafauna. Our study area includes a voluntary no-entry reserve embedded within wider critical habitat for Threatened 'northern resident' killer whales under Canada's Species at Risk Act. Our study quantified the reserve's importance to whales by assessing habitat preference in a behavioural context, and population-level implications of that preference given threats from human activities, such as oil spills resulting from shipping traffic. We recorded summertime activities of whales from 1995 to 2002. Whales were observed on 397 of 530 (74.9%) days. Whales showed strong preference for the reserve over adjacent waters, and used it preferentially for feeding and beach-rubbing. While the area comprises similar to 0.001% of the whales' range, an overall average of 6.5% of the population was present each day Frequently, >50% of this small population was aggregated in the restricted and heavily trafficked waterway of Johnstone Strait. Using the Potential Biological Removal equation, we calculated potential annual mortality limits (ML) of 2.2 animals. Mean group size in the area exceeded ML on 55.8% of days overall, and 98.8% of days when conditioning on whale presence. The whales' high reliance on a trivial fraction of their range means that opportunities are routine for one stochastic, catastrophic event to cause population decline. On 20 August 2007, a barge loaded with similar to 10,000 L of diesel sank in the area, exposing 25% of the population. This underscores the importance of identifying critical habitat for threatened populations, and ensuring meaningful protection. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Cetacean

KW - Extinction

KW - Marine mammal

KW - Marine protected area

KW - Oil spill

KW - Reserve

KW - Sociality

KW - Bottle-nosed dolphins

KW - Orcinus-orca

KW - Anthropogenic mortality

KW - British-Columbia

KW - Potential limits

KW - Management

KW - Cetaceans

KW - Behavior

KW - Impacts

KW - Abundance

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.004

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.004

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 709

EP - 719

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

IS - 4

ER -