The role of staff MFF in distributing NHS funding

taking account of differences in local labour market conditions

Robert Elliott, Ada Ma, Matt Sutton, Diane Skatun, Nigel Rice, Stephen Morris, Alex McConnachie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The National Health Service (NHS) in England distributes substantial funds to health-care providers in different geographical areas to pay for the health care required by the populations they serve. The formulae that determine this distribution reflect populations' health needs and local differences in the prices of inputs. Labour is the most important input and area differences in the price of labour are measured by the Staff Market Forces Factor (MFF). This Staff MFF has been the subject of much debate. Though the Staff MFF has operated for almost 30 years this is the first academic paper to evaluate and test the theory and method that underpin the MFF. The theory underpinning the Staff MFF is the General Labour Market method. The analysis reported here reveals empirical support for this theory in the case of nursing staff employed by NHS hospitals, but fails to identify similar support for its application to medical staff. The paper demonstrates the extent of spatial variation in private sector and NHS wages, considers the choice of comparators and spatial geography, incorporates vacancy modelling and illustrates the effect of spatial smoothing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)532-548
Number of pages17
JournalHealth Economics
Volume19
Issue number5
Early online date4 Aug 2009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

National Health Programs
Geography
Private Sector
Nursing Staff
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Medical Staff
Financial Management
England
Health Personnel
Demography
Delivery of Health Care
Health
Population

Keywords

  • NHS expenditure
  • resource allocation
  • health-care finance
  • labour cost variations
  • market forces factor

Cite this

The role of staff MFF in distributing NHS funding : taking account of differences in local labour market conditions. / Elliott, Robert; Ma, Ada; Sutton, Matt; Skatun, Diane; Rice, Nigel; Morris, Stephen; McConnachie, Alex.

In: Health Economics, Vol. 19, No. 5, 05.2010, p. 532-548.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elliott, Robert ; Ma, Ada ; Sutton, Matt ; Skatun, Diane ; Rice, Nigel ; Morris, Stephen ; McConnachie, Alex. / The role of staff MFF in distributing NHS funding : taking account of differences in local labour market conditions. In: Health Economics. 2010 ; Vol. 19, No. 5. pp. 532-548.
@article{37fcc9eb90ce41a08d6123c6b9050b3e,
title = "The role of staff MFF in distributing NHS funding: taking account of differences in local labour market conditions",
abstract = "The National Health Service (NHS) in England distributes substantial funds to health-care providers in different geographical areas to pay for the health care required by the populations they serve. The formulae that determine this distribution reflect populations' health needs and local differences in the prices of inputs. Labour is the most important input and area differences in the price of labour are measured by the Staff Market Forces Factor (MFF). This Staff MFF has been the subject of much debate. Though the Staff MFF has operated for almost 30 years this is the first academic paper to evaluate and test the theory and method that underpin the MFF. The theory underpinning the Staff MFF is the General Labour Market method. The analysis reported here reveals empirical support for this theory in the case of nursing staff employed by NHS hospitals, but fails to identify similar support for its application to medical staff. The paper demonstrates the extent of spatial variation in private sector and NHS wages, considers the choice of comparators and spatial geography, incorporates vacancy modelling and illustrates the effect of spatial smoothing.",
keywords = "NHS expenditure, resource allocation, health-care finance, labour cost variations, market forces factor",
author = "Robert Elliott and Ada Ma and Matt Sutton and Diane Skatun and Nigel Rice and Stephen Morris and Alex McConnachie",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1002/hec.1489",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "532--548",
journal = "Health Economics",
issn = "1057-9230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of staff MFF in distributing NHS funding

T2 - taking account of differences in local labour market conditions

AU - Elliott, Robert

AU - Ma, Ada

AU - Sutton, Matt

AU - Skatun, Diane

AU - Rice, Nigel

AU - Morris, Stephen

AU - McConnachie, Alex

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - The National Health Service (NHS) in England distributes substantial funds to health-care providers in different geographical areas to pay for the health care required by the populations they serve. The formulae that determine this distribution reflect populations' health needs and local differences in the prices of inputs. Labour is the most important input and area differences in the price of labour are measured by the Staff Market Forces Factor (MFF). This Staff MFF has been the subject of much debate. Though the Staff MFF has operated for almost 30 years this is the first academic paper to evaluate and test the theory and method that underpin the MFF. The theory underpinning the Staff MFF is the General Labour Market method. The analysis reported here reveals empirical support for this theory in the case of nursing staff employed by NHS hospitals, but fails to identify similar support for its application to medical staff. The paper demonstrates the extent of spatial variation in private sector and NHS wages, considers the choice of comparators and spatial geography, incorporates vacancy modelling and illustrates the effect of spatial smoothing.

AB - The National Health Service (NHS) in England distributes substantial funds to health-care providers in different geographical areas to pay for the health care required by the populations they serve. The formulae that determine this distribution reflect populations' health needs and local differences in the prices of inputs. Labour is the most important input and area differences in the price of labour are measured by the Staff Market Forces Factor (MFF). This Staff MFF has been the subject of much debate. Though the Staff MFF has operated for almost 30 years this is the first academic paper to evaluate and test the theory and method that underpin the MFF. The theory underpinning the Staff MFF is the General Labour Market method. The analysis reported here reveals empirical support for this theory in the case of nursing staff employed by NHS hospitals, but fails to identify similar support for its application to medical staff. The paper demonstrates the extent of spatial variation in private sector and NHS wages, considers the choice of comparators and spatial geography, incorporates vacancy modelling and illustrates the effect of spatial smoothing.

KW - NHS expenditure

KW - resource allocation

KW - health-care finance

KW - labour cost variations

KW - market forces factor

U2 - 10.1002/hec.1489

DO - 10.1002/hec.1489

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 532

EP - 548

JO - Health Economics

JF - Health Economics

SN - 1057-9230

IS - 5

ER -