The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist

Emergent Distinctions in an Interdisciplinary Collaboration

James Leach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes ethnographic material from several art and science research collaborations that were funded under a single funding scheme in the UK between 2003 and 2006. The material illustrates the way that distinctions between aesthetic value and utility value emerged during the interactions of the participants. It outlines how conceptual positions about the contrasting value of art and of science shaped their collaborative practice. I relate key distinctions that emerged in their statements to the parallel division in intellectual property law between copyright and patent. The intention is to show how seemingly natural and given differences that inform both law and disciplinary practice are generated and regenerated in a manner that divides persons, things, and disciplines in the very practices that these categories reciprocally inform and shape.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-163
Number of pages21
JournalSocial Analysis
Volume55
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2011

Fingerprint

artist
utility value
art
Law
intellectual property
science
patent
Values
aesthetics
funding
human being
interaction
Artist
Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Person
Research Collaboration
Property Law
Art
Intellectual Property
Ethnographic

Keywords

  • aesthetics
  • art and science collaboration
  • copyright law
  • interdisciplinary research
  • knowledge
  • patent law
  • utility

Cite this

The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist : Emergent Distinctions in an Interdisciplinary Collaboration. / Leach, James .

In: Social Analysis, Vol. 55, No. 3, 01.12.2011, p. 143-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ed856438fd443569c21546eb8f5f9d1,
title = "The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist: Emergent Distinctions in an Interdisciplinary Collaboration",
abstract = "This article analyzes ethnographic material from several art and science research collaborations that were funded under a single funding scheme in the UK between 2003 and 2006. The material illustrates the way that distinctions between aesthetic value and utility value emerged during the interactions of the participants. It outlines how conceptual positions about the contrasting value of art and of science shaped their collaborative practice. I relate key distinctions that emerged in their statements to the parallel division in intellectual property law between copyright and patent. The intention is to show how seemingly natural and given differences that inform both law and disciplinary practice are generated and regenerated in a manner that divides persons, things, and disciplines in the very practices that these categories reciprocally inform and shape.",
keywords = "aesthetics, art and science collaboration, copyright law, interdisciplinary research, knowledge, patent law, utility",
author = "James Leach",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3167/sa.2011.550308",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "143--163",
journal = "Social Analysis",
issn = "0155-977X",
publisher = "Berghahn Journals",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Self of the Scientist, Material for the Artist

T2 - Emergent Distinctions in an Interdisciplinary Collaboration

AU - Leach, James

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - This article analyzes ethnographic material from several art and science research collaborations that were funded under a single funding scheme in the UK between 2003 and 2006. The material illustrates the way that distinctions between aesthetic value and utility value emerged during the interactions of the participants. It outlines how conceptual positions about the contrasting value of art and of science shaped their collaborative practice. I relate key distinctions that emerged in their statements to the parallel division in intellectual property law between copyright and patent. The intention is to show how seemingly natural and given differences that inform both law and disciplinary practice are generated and regenerated in a manner that divides persons, things, and disciplines in the very practices that these categories reciprocally inform and shape.

AB - This article analyzes ethnographic material from several art and science research collaborations that were funded under a single funding scheme in the UK between 2003 and 2006. The material illustrates the way that distinctions between aesthetic value and utility value emerged during the interactions of the participants. It outlines how conceptual positions about the contrasting value of art and of science shaped their collaborative practice. I relate key distinctions that emerged in their statements to the parallel division in intellectual property law between copyright and patent. The intention is to show how seemingly natural and given differences that inform both law and disciplinary practice are generated and regenerated in a manner that divides persons, things, and disciplines in the very practices that these categories reciprocally inform and shape.

KW - aesthetics

KW - art and science collaboration

KW - copyright law

KW - interdisciplinary research

KW - knowledge

KW - patent law

KW - utility

U2 - 10.3167/sa.2011.550308

DO - 10.3167/sa.2011.550308

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 143

EP - 163

JO - Social Analysis

JF - Social Analysis

SN - 0155-977X

IS - 3

ER -