The Titularization of Latvian Secondary Schools

the historical legacy of Soviet policy implementation

David J. Galbreath, Mary Elizabeth Galvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few would deny that the Soviet occupation has had an effect on postrestoration policy making and implementation in Latvia. Indeed, many commentators of post-Soviet politics insist that we must come to terms with the Soviet to understand the post-Soviet. In our view, the effects of the Soviet legacy on the policy process are clearly apparent in post-restoration Latvia, specifically in the area of language education policy. This article argues that both Soviet and post-Soviet policy making and implementation can be characterized in three ways: duplicity, a Soviet ethos, and "professionalization". In what follows, we first engage with the Soviet policy process in general and the 1958-59 education reforms specifically. Based on interviews with education professionals, teachers and parents, we then analyze Latvian education laws and their implementation in 2004, highlighting the legacy of Soviet governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)449-466
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Baltic Studies
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • education

Cite this

The Titularization of Latvian Secondary Schools : the historical legacy of Soviet policy implementation. / Galbreath, David J.; Galvin, Mary Elizabeth.

In: Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2005, p. 449-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Galbreath, David J. ; Galvin, Mary Elizabeth. / The Titularization of Latvian Secondary Schools : the historical legacy of Soviet policy implementation. In: Journal of Baltic Studies. 2005 ; Vol. 36, No. 4. pp. 449-466.
@article{eb86247b2d7d40c496b47142c3223201,
title = "The Titularization of Latvian Secondary Schools: the historical legacy of Soviet policy implementation",
abstract = "Few would deny that the Soviet occupation has had an effect on postrestoration policy making and implementation in Latvia. Indeed, many commentators of post-Soviet politics insist that we must come to terms with the Soviet to understand the post-Soviet. In our view, the effects of the Soviet legacy on the policy process are clearly apparent in post-restoration Latvia, specifically in the area of language education policy. This article argues that both Soviet and post-Soviet policy making and implementation can be characterized in three ways: duplicity, a Soviet ethos, and {"}professionalization{"}. In what follows, we first engage with the Soviet policy process in general and the 1958-59 education reforms specifically. Based on interviews with education professionals, teachers and parents, we then analyze Latvian education laws and their implementation in 2004, highlighting the legacy of Soviet governance.",
keywords = "education",
author = "Galbreath, {David J.} and Galvin, {Mary Elizabeth}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/01629770500000201",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "449--466",
journal = "Journal of Baltic Studies",
issn = "0162-9778",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Titularization of Latvian Secondary Schools

T2 - the historical legacy of Soviet policy implementation

AU - Galbreath, David J.

AU - Galvin, Mary Elizabeth

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Few would deny that the Soviet occupation has had an effect on postrestoration policy making and implementation in Latvia. Indeed, many commentators of post-Soviet politics insist that we must come to terms with the Soviet to understand the post-Soviet. In our view, the effects of the Soviet legacy on the policy process are clearly apparent in post-restoration Latvia, specifically in the area of language education policy. This article argues that both Soviet and post-Soviet policy making and implementation can be characterized in three ways: duplicity, a Soviet ethos, and "professionalization". In what follows, we first engage with the Soviet policy process in general and the 1958-59 education reforms specifically. Based on interviews with education professionals, teachers and parents, we then analyze Latvian education laws and their implementation in 2004, highlighting the legacy of Soviet governance.

AB - Few would deny that the Soviet occupation has had an effect on postrestoration policy making and implementation in Latvia. Indeed, many commentators of post-Soviet politics insist that we must come to terms with the Soviet to understand the post-Soviet. In our view, the effects of the Soviet legacy on the policy process are clearly apparent in post-restoration Latvia, specifically in the area of language education policy. This article argues that both Soviet and post-Soviet policy making and implementation can be characterized in three ways: duplicity, a Soviet ethos, and "professionalization". In what follows, we first engage with the Soviet policy process in general and the 1958-59 education reforms specifically. Based on interviews with education professionals, teachers and parents, we then analyze Latvian education laws and their implementation in 2004, highlighting the legacy of Soviet governance.

KW - education

U2 - 10.1080/01629770500000201

DO - 10.1080/01629770500000201

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 449

EP - 466

JO - Journal of Baltic Studies

JF - Journal of Baltic Studies

SN - 0162-9778

IS - 4

ER -