The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward

Z. Carter Berry (Corresponding Author), Jaivime Evaristo, Georgianne Moore, María Poca, Kathy Steppe, Lucile Verrot, Heidi Asbjornsen, Laura S. Borma, Mario Bretfeld, Pedro Hervé-Fernández, Mark Seyfried, Luitgard Schwendenmann, Katherine Sinacore, Lien De Wispelaere, Jeffrey McDonnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies using water isotopes have shown that trees and streams appear to return distinct water pools to the hydrosphere. Cryogenically extracted plant and soil water isotopic signatures diverge from the meteoric water lines, suggesting that plants would preferentially use bound soil water, while mobile soil water that infiltrates the soil recharges groundwater and feeds streamflow all plots on meteoric water lines. These findings have been described under the “two water worlds” (TWW) hypothesis. In spite of growing evidence for the TWW hypothesis, several questions remain unsolved within the scope of this framework. Here, we address the TWW as a null hypothesis and further assess the following: (a) the theoretical biophysical feasibility for two distinct water pools to exist, (b) plant and soil processes that could explain the different isotopic composition between the two water pools, and (c) methodological issues that could explain the divergent isotopic signatures. Moreover, we propose a way forward under the framework of the TWW hypothesis, proposing alternative perspectives and explanations, experiments to further test them, and methodological advances that could help illuminate this quest. We further highlight the need to improve our sampling resolution of plants and soils across time and space. We ultimately propose a set of key priorities for future research to improve our understanding of the ecohydrological processes controlling water flows through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1843
JournalEcohydrology
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date2 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Keywords

  • bulk soil water
  • ecohydrological separation
  • preferential flow
  • stable isotopes
  • two-domain flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Berry, Z. C., Evaristo, J., Moore, G., Poca, M., Steppe, K., Verrot, L., Asbjornsen, H., Borma, L. S., Bretfeld, M., Hervé-Fernández, P., Seyfried, M., Schwendenmann, L., Sinacore, K., De Wispelaere, L., & McDonnell, J. (2018). The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward. Ecohydrology, 11(3), [e1843]. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1843