The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward

Z. Carter Berry (Corresponding Author), Jaivime Evaristo, Georgianne Moore, María Poca, Kathy Steppe, Lucile Verrot, Heidi Asbjornsen, Laura S. Borma, Mario Bretfeld, Pedro Hervé-Fernández, Mark Seyfried, Luitgard Schwendenmann, Katherine Sinacore, Lien De Wispelaere, Jeffrey McDonnell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent studies using water isotopes have shown that trees and streams appear to return distinct water pools to the hydrosphere. Cryogenically extracted plant and soil water isotopic signatures diverge from the meteoric water lines, suggesting that plants would preferentially use bound soil water, while mobile soil water that infiltrates the soil recharges groundwater and feeds streamflow all plots on meteoric water lines. These findings have been described under the “two water worlds” (TWW) hypothesis. In spite of growing evidence for the TWW hypothesis, several questions remain unsolved within the scope of this framework. Here, we address the TWW as a null hypothesis and further assess the following: (a) the theoretical biophysical feasibility for two distinct water pools to exist, (b) plant and soil processes that could explain the different isotopic composition between the two water pools, and (c) methodological issues that could explain the divergent isotopic signatures. Moreover, we propose a way forward under the framework of the TWW hypothesis, proposing alternative perspectives and explanations, experiments to further test them, and methodological advances that could help illuminate this quest. We further highlight the need to improve our sampling resolution of plants and soils across time and space. We ultimately propose a set of key priorities for future research to improve our understanding of the ecohydrological processes controlling water flows through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1843
JournalEcohydrology
Volume11
Issue number3
Early online date2 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Water
water
Soil
soil water
meteoric water
shoreline
hydrosphere
world
soil
groundwater recharge
streamflow
water flow
recharge
stream flow
isotopic composition
space and time
isotope
isotopes
Groundwater
groundwater

Keywords

  • bulk soil water
  • ecohydrological separation
  • preferential flow
  • stable isotopes
  • two-domain flow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Berry, Z. C., Evaristo, J., Moore, G., Poca, M., Steppe, K., Verrot, L., ... McDonnell, J. (2018). The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward. Ecohydrology, 11(3), [e1843]. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1843

The two water worlds hypothesis : Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward. / Berry, Z. Carter (Corresponding Author); Evaristo, Jaivime; Moore, Georgianne ; Poca, María; Steppe, Kathy; Verrot, Lucile; Asbjornsen, Heidi; Borma, Laura S.; Bretfeld, Mario; Hervé-Fernández, Pedro; Seyfried, Mark; Schwendenmann, Luitgard; Sinacore, Katherine; De Wispelaere, Lien; McDonnell, Jeffrey.

In: Ecohydrology, Vol. 11, No. 3, e1843, 04.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Berry, ZC, Evaristo, J, Moore, G, Poca, M, Steppe, K, Verrot, L, Asbjornsen, H, Borma, LS, Bretfeld, M, Hervé-Fernández, P, Seyfried, M, Schwendenmann, L, Sinacore, K, De Wispelaere, L & McDonnell, J 2018, 'The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward', Ecohydrology, vol. 11, no. 3, e1843. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1843
Berry, Z. Carter ; Evaristo, Jaivime ; Moore, Georgianne ; Poca, María ; Steppe, Kathy ; Verrot, Lucile ; Asbjornsen, Heidi ; Borma, Laura S. ; Bretfeld, Mario ; Hervé-Fernández, Pedro ; Seyfried, Mark ; Schwendenmann, Luitgard ; Sinacore, Katherine ; De Wispelaere, Lien ; McDonnell, Jeffrey. / The two water worlds hypothesis : Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward. In: Ecohydrology. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 3.
@article{d4394404e61745dc8eadaa66d296e53a,
title = "The two water worlds hypothesis: Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward",
abstract = "Recent studies using water isotopes have shown that trees and streams appear to return distinct water pools to the hydrosphere. Cryogenically extracted plant and soil water isotopic signatures diverge from the meteoric water lines, suggesting that plants would preferentially use bound soil water, while mobile soil water that infiltrates the soil recharges groundwater and feeds streamflow all plots on meteoric water lines. These findings have been described under the “two water worlds” (TWW) hypothesis. In spite of growing evidence for the TWW hypothesis, several questions remain unsolved within the scope of this framework. Here, we address the TWW as a null hypothesis and further assess the following: (a) the theoretical biophysical feasibility for two distinct water pools to exist, (b) plant and soil processes that could explain the different isotopic composition between the two water pools, and (c) methodological issues that could explain the divergent isotopic signatures. Moreover, we propose a way forward under the framework of the TWW hypothesis, proposing alternative perspectives and explanations, experiments to further test them, and methodological advances that could help illuminate this quest. We further highlight the need to improve our sampling resolution of plants and soils across time and space. We ultimately propose a set of key priorities for future research to improve our understanding of the ecohydrological processes controlling water flows through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum.",
keywords = "bulk soil water, ecohydrological separation, preferential flow, stable isotopes, two-domain flow",
author = "Berry, {Z. Carter} and Jaivime Evaristo and Georgianne Moore and Mar{\'i}a Poca and Kathy Steppe and Lucile Verrot and Heidi Asbjornsen and Borma, {Laura S.} and Mario Bretfeld and Pedro Herv{\'e}-Fern{\'a}ndez and Mark Seyfried and Luitgard Schwendenmann and Katherine Sinacore and {De Wispelaere}, Lien and Jeffrey McDonnell",
note = "We thank the AGU Chapman Conference on the Emerging Issues in Tropical Ecohydrology that took place in June, 2016 in Cuenca, Ecuador. Many of the ideas for this synthesis were developed during conversations there. We particularly would like to thank Brad Wilcox for organizing the conference and encouraging breakout discussions. Z.C.B., M.P., M.B., L.D.W., H.A., and K.S. (Katherine Sinacore) specifically acknowledge NSF for awarding a travel grant for attending the conference. P.H-F. acknowledges Programa de Personal Avanzado CONICYT, Becas Chile; and BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) for funding PhD studies. LV was supported by the Swedish University strategic environmental research program Ekoklim and the Swedish Research Council Formas (project 2012-790) and would also like to acknowledge the British National Environment Research Council (grant NE/N007611/1).",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1002/eco.1843",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "Ecohydrology",
issn = "1936-0584",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The two water worlds hypothesis

T2 - Addressing multiple working hypotheses and proposing a way forward

AU - Berry, Z. Carter

AU - Evaristo, Jaivime

AU - Moore, Georgianne

AU - Poca, María

AU - Steppe, Kathy

AU - Verrot, Lucile

AU - Asbjornsen, Heidi

AU - Borma, Laura S.

AU - Bretfeld, Mario

AU - Hervé-Fernández, Pedro

AU - Seyfried, Mark

AU - Schwendenmann, Luitgard

AU - Sinacore, Katherine

AU - De Wispelaere, Lien

AU - McDonnell, Jeffrey

N1 - We thank the AGU Chapman Conference on the Emerging Issues in Tropical Ecohydrology that took place in June, 2016 in Cuenca, Ecuador. Many of the ideas for this synthesis were developed during conversations there. We particularly would like to thank Brad Wilcox for organizing the conference and encouraging breakout discussions. Z.C.B., M.P., M.B., L.D.W., H.A., and K.S. (Katherine Sinacore) specifically acknowledge NSF for awarding a travel grant for attending the conference. P.H-F. acknowledges Programa de Personal Avanzado CONICYT, Becas Chile; and BOF (Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds) for funding PhD studies. LV was supported by the Swedish University strategic environmental research program Ekoklim and the Swedish Research Council Formas (project 2012-790) and would also like to acknowledge the British National Environment Research Council (grant NE/N007611/1).

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - Recent studies using water isotopes have shown that trees and streams appear to return distinct water pools to the hydrosphere. Cryogenically extracted plant and soil water isotopic signatures diverge from the meteoric water lines, suggesting that plants would preferentially use bound soil water, while mobile soil water that infiltrates the soil recharges groundwater and feeds streamflow all plots on meteoric water lines. These findings have been described under the “two water worlds” (TWW) hypothesis. In spite of growing evidence for the TWW hypothesis, several questions remain unsolved within the scope of this framework. Here, we address the TWW as a null hypothesis and further assess the following: (a) the theoretical biophysical feasibility for two distinct water pools to exist, (b) plant and soil processes that could explain the different isotopic composition between the two water pools, and (c) methodological issues that could explain the divergent isotopic signatures. Moreover, we propose a way forward under the framework of the TWW hypothesis, proposing alternative perspectives and explanations, experiments to further test them, and methodological advances that could help illuminate this quest. We further highlight the need to improve our sampling resolution of plants and soils across time and space. We ultimately propose a set of key priorities for future research to improve our understanding of the ecohydrological processes controlling water flows through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum.

AB - Recent studies using water isotopes have shown that trees and streams appear to return distinct water pools to the hydrosphere. Cryogenically extracted plant and soil water isotopic signatures diverge from the meteoric water lines, suggesting that plants would preferentially use bound soil water, while mobile soil water that infiltrates the soil recharges groundwater and feeds streamflow all plots on meteoric water lines. These findings have been described under the “two water worlds” (TWW) hypothesis. In spite of growing evidence for the TWW hypothesis, several questions remain unsolved within the scope of this framework. Here, we address the TWW as a null hypothesis and further assess the following: (a) the theoretical biophysical feasibility for two distinct water pools to exist, (b) plant and soil processes that could explain the different isotopic composition between the two water pools, and (c) methodological issues that could explain the divergent isotopic signatures. Moreover, we propose a way forward under the framework of the TWW hypothesis, proposing alternative perspectives and explanations, experiments to further test them, and methodological advances that could help illuminate this quest. We further highlight the need to improve our sampling resolution of plants and soils across time and space. We ultimately propose a set of key priorities for future research to improve our understanding of the ecohydrological processes controlling water flows through the soil–plant-atmosphere continuum.

KW - bulk soil water

KW - ecohydrological separation

KW - preferential flow

KW - stable isotopes

KW - two-domain flow

U2 - 10.1002/eco.1843

DO - 10.1002/eco.1843

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Ecohydrology

JF - Ecohydrology

SN - 1936-0584

IS - 3

M1 - e1843

ER -