The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it?

Why and how might you use it?

Jon Dowell (Corresponding Author), Jennifer Cleland, Siobhan Fitzpatrick, Chris McManus, Sandra Nicholson, Thomas Oppé, Katie Petty-Saphon, Olga Sierocinska King, Daniel Smith, Steve Thornton, Kirsty White

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.

OVERVIEW: A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.

CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume18
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

career
education
fitness
school
governance
trainee
resources
performance
inclusion
graduate
medicine
regulation
planning
costs
evidence
Group
student

Keywords

  • Letter
  • selection
  • personnel
  • medical schools
  • education - medical graduate
  • education - medical undergraduate
  • fitness to practice

Cite this

The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it? Why and how might you use it? / Dowell, Jon (Corresponding Author); Cleland, Jennifer; Fitzpatrick, Siobhan; McManus, Chris; Nicholson, Sandra; Oppé, Thomas; Petty-Saphon, Katie; King, Olga Sierocinska; Smith, Daniel; Thornton, Steve; White, Kirsty.

In: BMC Medical Education, Vol. 18, 6, 05.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dowell, J, Cleland, J, Fitzpatrick, S, McManus, C, Nicholson, S, Oppé, T, Petty-Saphon, K, King, OS, Smith, D, Thornton, S & White, K 2018, 'The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it? Why and how might you use it?', BMC Medical Education, vol. 18, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1115-9
Dowell, Jon ; Cleland, Jennifer ; Fitzpatrick, Siobhan ; McManus, Chris ; Nicholson, Sandra ; Oppé, Thomas ; Petty-Saphon, Katie ; King, Olga Sierocinska ; Smith, Daniel ; Thornton, Steve ; White, Kirsty. / The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it? Why and how might you use it?. In: BMC Medical Education. 2018 ; Vol. 18.
@article{297525b59b6840f2861b40cb8f175878,
title = "The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it?: Why and how might you use it?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.OVERVIEW: A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.",
keywords = "Letter, selection, personnel, medical schools, education - medical graduate, education - medical undergraduate, fitness to practice",
author = "Jon Dowell and Jennifer Cleland and Siobhan Fitzpatrick and Chris McManus and Sandra Nicholson and Thomas Opp{\'e} and Katie Petty-Saphon and King, {Olga Sierocinska} and Daniel Smith and Steve Thornton and Kirsty White",
note = "The development of UKMED has not been directly funded by but has received support from the General Medical Council and Medical Schools Council as well as staff time from all participating organisations.",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1186/s12909-017-1115-9",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Medical Education",
issn = "1472-6920",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The UK medical education database (UKMED) what is it?

T2 - Why and how might you use it?

AU - Dowell, Jon

AU - Cleland, Jennifer

AU - Fitzpatrick, Siobhan

AU - McManus, Chris

AU - Nicholson, Sandra

AU - Oppé, Thomas

AU - Petty-Saphon, Katie

AU - King, Olga Sierocinska

AU - Smith, Daniel

AU - Thornton, Steve

AU - White, Kirsty

N1 - The development of UKMED has not been directly funded by but has received support from the General Medical Council and Medical Schools Council as well as staff time from all participating organisations.

PY - 2018/1/5

Y1 - 2018/1/5

N2 - BACKGROUND: Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.OVERVIEW: A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.

AB - BACKGROUND: Educating doctors is expensive and poor performance by future graduates can literally cost lives. Whilst the practice of medicine is highly evidence based, medical education is much less so. Research on medical school selection, undergraduate progression, Fitness to Practise (FtP) and postgraduate careers has been hampered across the globe by the challenges of uniting the data required. This paper describes the creation, structure and access arrangements for the first UK-wide attempt to do so.OVERVIEW: A collaborative approach has created a research database commencing with all entrants to UK medical schools in 2007 and 2008 (UKMED Phase 1). Here the content is outlined, governance arrangements considered, system access explained, and the potential implications of this new resource discussed. The data currently include achievements prior to medical school entry, admissions tests, graduation point information and also all subsequent data collected by the General Medical Council, including FtP, career progression, annual National Training Survey (NTS) responses, career choice and postgraduate exam performance data. UKMED has grown since the pilot phase with additional datasets; all subsequent years of students/trainees and stronger governance processes. The inclusion of future cohorts and additional information such as admissions scores or bespoke surveys or assessments is now being piloted. Thus, for instance, new scrutiny can be applied to selection techniques and the effectiveness of educational interventions. Data are available free of charge for approved studies from suitable research groups worldwide.CONCLUSION: It is anticipated that UKMED will continue on a rolling basis. This has the potential to radically change the volume and types of research that can be envisaged and, therefore, to improve standards, facilitate workforce planning and support the regulation of medical education and training. This paper aspires to encourage proposals to utilise this exciting resource.

KW - Letter

KW - selection

KW - personnel

KW - medical schools

KW - education - medical graduate

KW - education - medical undergraduate

KW - fitness to practice

U2 - 10.1186/s12909-017-1115-9

DO - 10.1186/s12909-017-1115-9

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Medical Education

JF - BMC Medical Education

SN - 1472-6920

M1 - 6

ER -