The United Nations Security Council Sanctions and International Human Rights

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article assesses whether the United Nations Security Council must respect
human rights under international law when acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. It argues that the Security Council has to respect human rights enshrined in those human rights treaties drawn up under the United Nations’ auspices and in non-peremptory customary international law, when this is not incompatible with the Security Council’s objective of maintaining or restoring international peace and security. The analysis also argues however that the Security Council must comply with peremptory international human rights, with no exception. The paper concludes that Chapter VII action by the Security
Council is limited only to a small extent by international human rights standards.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)277-311
Number of pages35
JournalVienna Journal on International Constitutional Law
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2016

Fingerprint

sanction
UNO
human rights
international law
charter
treaty
respect
peace

Keywords

  • United Nations Security Council
  • peace enforcment action
  • international human rights

Cite this

The United Nations Security Council Sanctions and International Human Rights. / Couzigou, Irene.

In: Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, Vol. 10, No. 3, 17.10.2016, p. 277-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c41d400872094b3391e2342dce660b17,
title = "The United Nations Security Council Sanctions and International Human Rights",
abstract = "This article assesses whether the United Nations Security Council must respecthuman rights under international law when acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. It argues that the Security Council has to respect human rights enshrined in those human rights treaties drawn up under the United Nations’ auspices and in non-peremptory customary international law, when this is not incompatible with the Security Council’s objective of maintaining or restoring international peace and security. The analysis also argues however that the Security Council must comply with peremptory international human rights, with no exception. The paper concludes that Chapter VII action by the SecurityCouncil is limited only to a small extent by international human rights standards.",
keywords = "United Nations Security Council, peace enforcment action, international human rights",
author = "Irene Couzigou",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1515/icl-2016-0303",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "277--311",
journal = "Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law",
issn = "1995-5855",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The United Nations Security Council Sanctions and International Human Rights

AU - Couzigou, Irene

PY - 2016/10/17

Y1 - 2016/10/17

N2 - This article assesses whether the United Nations Security Council must respecthuman rights under international law when acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. It argues that the Security Council has to respect human rights enshrined in those human rights treaties drawn up under the United Nations’ auspices and in non-peremptory customary international law, when this is not incompatible with the Security Council’s objective of maintaining or restoring international peace and security. The analysis also argues however that the Security Council must comply with peremptory international human rights, with no exception. The paper concludes that Chapter VII action by the SecurityCouncil is limited only to a small extent by international human rights standards.

AB - This article assesses whether the United Nations Security Council must respecthuman rights under international law when acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter. It argues that the Security Council has to respect human rights enshrined in those human rights treaties drawn up under the United Nations’ auspices and in non-peremptory customary international law, when this is not incompatible with the Security Council’s objective of maintaining or restoring international peace and security. The analysis also argues however that the Security Council must comply with peremptory international human rights, with no exception. The paper concludes that Chapter VII action by the SecurityCouncil is limited only to a small extent by international human rights standards.

KW - United Nations Security Council

KW - peace enforcment action

KW - international human rights

U2 - 10.1515/icl-2016-0303

DO - 10.1515/icl-2016-0303

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 277

EP - 311

JO - Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law

JF - Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law

SN - 1995-5855

IS - 3

ER -