The use of nitrogen fertilizer on alternative grassland feeding refuges for pink-footed geese in spring

Ian James Patterson, R. M. E. Fuchs

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    1. Intensive agriculture often reduces biodiversity on farmed land, but the converse situation, of wildlife damaging agriculture, is also important. A striking example is agricultural damage by increasing populations of wild geese. Alternative feeding refuges, designed to reduce damage, will be most effective if the grass swards are made as attractive to geese as possible. This paper describes an explicitly experimental study in north-east Scotland during 1990-93, which investigated the effectiveness of different rates of application of nitrogenous fertilizer on the amount of grazing by pink-footed geese in spring, compared split-application with single-application of spring fertilizer, and evaluated the use of slow-release fertilizer in winter.

    2. The amount of goose grazing, measured from cumulative dropping density, increased with application rates of spring fertilizer, up to around 80 kg N ha(-1), in parallel with a similar increase in grass production. Beyond this level there was little further increase, and cost-effectiveness, measured as the percentage increase in dropping density per kg N ha(-1) applied, was greatly reduced.

    3. Dropping density and grass production did not differ significantly between split-application and single-application of spring fertilizer. Split-application should reduce the risk of nitrogen leaching in cold wet seasons, but the cost of application would be double that of single-application.

    4. Overall, cumulative dropping density and grass production in late May were not significantly greater in plots treated over the winter with slow-release fertilizer than in untreated plots. Dropping density was, however, higher in treated plots than in untreated ones during a short mild period in early spring. Slow-release fertilizer may be of benefit in mild winters, but is more expensive than conventional nitrogenous fertilizer.

    5. This study has shown that nitrogenous fertilizer can greatly increase goose grazing on sacrificial grassland refuges in spring and is a useful tool in reducing conflict between farmers and increasing goose populations.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)637-646
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
    Volume38
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • fertilizer application
    • sacrificial crops
    • slow-release fertilizer
    • split-level
    • wild geese
    • WHITE-FRONTED GEESE
    • BRENT GEESE
    • ANSER-BRACHYRHYNCHUS
    • HERBAGE PRODUCTION
    • BARNACLE GEESE
    • FOOD QUALITY
    • WILD GEESE
    • SELECTION
    • FARMLAND
    • WINTER

    Cite this

    The use of nitrogen fertilizer on alternative grassland feeding refuges for pink-footed geese in spring. / Patterson, Ian James; Fuchs, R. M. E.

    In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 38, 2001, p. 637-646.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{c1334c14d2cc43f1b9b186240587d7f1,
    title = "The use of nitrogen fertilizer on alternative grassland feeding refuges for pink-footed geese in spring",
    abstract = "1. Intensive agriculture often reduces biodiversity on farmed land, but the converse situation, of wildlife damaging agriculture, is also important. A striking example is agricultural damage by increasing populations of wild geese. Alternative feeding refuges, designed to reduce damage, will be most effective if the grass swards are made as attractive to geese as possible. This paper describes an explicitly experimental study in north-east Scotland during 1990-93, which investigated the effectiveness of different rates of application of nitrogenous fertilizer on the amount of grazing by pink-footed geese in spring, compared split-application with single-application of spring fertilizer, and evaluated the use of slow-release fertilizer in winter.2. The amount of goose grazing, measured from cumulative dropping density, increased with application rates of spring fertilizer, up to around 80 kg N ha(-1), in parallel with a similar increase in grass production. Beyond this level there was little further increase, and cost-effectiveness, measured as the percentage increase in dropping density per kg N ha(-1) applied, was greatly reduced.3. Dropping density and grass production did not differ significantly between split-application and single-application of spring fertilizer. Split-application should reduce the risk of nitrogen leaching in cold wet seasons, but the cost of application would be double that of single-application.4. Overall, cumulative dropping density and grass production in late May were not significantly greater in plots treated over the winter with slow-release fertilizer than in untreated plots. Dropping density was, however, higher in treated plots than in untreated ones during a short mild period in early spring. Slow-release fertilizer may be of benefit in mild winters, but is more expensive than conventional nitrogenous fertilizer.5. This study has shown that nitrogenous fertilizer can greatly increase goose grazing on sacrificial grassland refuges in spring and is a useful tool in reducing conflict between farmers and increasing goose populations.",
    keywords = "fertilizer application, sacrificial crops, slow-release fertilizer, split-level, wild geese, WHITE-FRONTED GEESE, BRENT GEESE, ANSER-BRACHYRHYNCHUS, HERBAGE PRODUCTION, BARNACLE GEESE, FOOD QUALITY, WILD GEESE, SELECTION, FARMLAND, WINTER",
    author = "Patterson, {Ian James} and Fuchs, {R. M. E.}",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00627.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "637--646",
    journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8901",
    publisher = "Wiley",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The use of nitrogen fertilizer on alternative grassland feeding refuges for pink-footed geese in spring

    AU - Patterson, Ian James

    AU - Fuchs, R. M. E.

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - 1. Intensive agriculture often reduces biodiversity on farmed land, but the converse situation, of wildlife damaging agriculture, is also important. A striking example is agricultural damage by increasing populations of wild geese. Alternative feeding refuges, designed to reduce damage, will be most effective if the grass swards are made as attractive to geese as possible. This paper describes an explicitly experimental study in north-east Scotland during 1990-93, which investigated the effectiveness of different rates of application of nitrogenous fertilizer on the amount of grazing by pink-footed geese in spring, compared split-application with single-application of spring fertilizer, and evaluated the use of slow-release fertilizer in winter.2. The amount of goose grazing, measured from cumulative dropping density, increased with application rates of spring fertilizer, up to around 80 kg N ha(-1), in parallel with a similar increase in grass production. Beyond this level there was little further increase, and cost-effectiveness, measured as the percentage increase in dropping density per kg N ha(-1) applied, was greatly reduced.3. Dropping density and grass production did not differ significantly between split-application and single-application of spring fertilizer. Split-application should reduce the risk of nitrogen leaching in cold wet seasons, but the cost of application would be double that of single-application.4. Overall, cumulative dropping density and grass production in late May were not significantly greater in plots treated over the winter with slow-release fertilizer than in untreated plots. Dropping density was, however, higher in treated plots than in untreated ones during a short mild period in early spring. Slow-release fertilizer may be of benefit in mild winters, but is more expensive than conventional nitrogenous fertilizer.5. This study has shown that nitrogenous fertilizer can greatly increase goose grazing on sacrificial grassland refuges in spring and is a useful tool in reducing conflict between farmers and increasing goose populations.

    AB - 1. Intensive agriculture often reduces biodiversity on farmed land, but the converse situation, of wildlife damaging agriculture, is also important. A striking example is agricultural damage by increasing populations of wild geese. Alternative feeding refuges, designed to reduce damage, will be most effective if the grass swards are made as attractive to geese as possible. This paper describes an explicitly experimental study in north-east Scotland during 1990-93, which investigated the effectiveness of different rates of application of nitrogenous fertilizer on the amount of grazing by pink-footed geese in spring, compared split-application with single-application of spring fertilizer, and evaluated the use of slow-release fertilizer in winter.2. The amount of goose grazing, measured from cumulative dropping density, increased with application rates of spring fertilizer, up to around 80 kg N ha(-1), in parallel with a similar increase in grass production. Beyond this level there was little further increase, and cost-effectiveness, measured as the percentage increase in dropping density per kg N ha(-1) applied, was greatly reduced.3. Dropping density and grass production did not differ significantly between split-application and single-application of spring fertilizer. Split-application should reduce the risk of nitrogen leaching in cold wet seasons, but the cost of application would be double that of single-application.4. Overall, cumulative dropping density and grass production in late May were not significantly greater in plots treated over the winter with slow-release fertilizer than in untreated plots. Dropping density was, however, higher in treated plots than in untreated ones during a short mild period in early spring. Slow-release fertilizer may be of benefit in mild winters, but is more expensive than conventional nitrogenous fertilizer.5. This study has shown that nitrogenous fertilizer can greatly increase goose grazing on sacrificial grassland refuges in spring and is a useful tool in reducing conflict between farmers and increasing goose populations.

    KW - fertilizer application

    KW - sacrificial crops

    KW - slow-release fertilizer

    KW - split-level

    KW - wild geese

    KW - WHITE-FRONTED GEESE

    KW - BRENT GEESE

    KW - ANSER-BRACHYRHYNCHUS

    KW - HERBAGE PRODUCTION

    KW - BARNACLE GEESE

    KW - FOOD QUALITY

    KW - WILD GEESE

    KW - SELECTION

    KW - FARMLAND

    KW - WINTER

    U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00627.x

    DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00627.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 38

    SP - 637

    EP - 646

    JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

    JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

    SN - 0021-8901

    ER -