The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons.

Roger J G Stevens, Neil McLeod Hamilton, J.M. O'Donoghue, Michaela P Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social software allows users to communicate and share data through online social interaction using Web 2.0 technology. Three hundred and fifty-six members of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) within the UK and Ireland were invited by e-mail to complete an online survey (e-survey) anonymously on their knowledge and use of Web 2.0 technology and whether they would like this to be used in BAPRAS’s e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). Fifty-eight members completed the e-survey (response rate of 58 out of 356 or 16.3%). The respondents comprised 52 males (89.7%) and 6 females (10.3%) with a mean age (range) of 44.1 years (24–61). Forty one (70.7%) were consultants and 17 (29.3%) were non-consultants with a mean time (range) at this level of 10.1 years (1–30) and 3.4 years (1–6), respectively. The mean (range) ages of consultants and non-consultants were 48.7 years (35–61) and 32.8 years (24–38), respectively. Fifty-eight (100%) plastic surgeons used the Internet and e-mail, 48 (82.8%) owned a handheld device and 48 (82.8%) owned a digital media player. Sixteen plastic surgeons (27.6%) used instant messaging, 29 (50.0%) used Internet telephone, 12 (20.7%) used videoconferencing, 23 (39.7%) used media sharing, 2 (3.4%) used social bookmarking, 21 (36.2%) used social networking, 24 (41.4%) used forums, 29 (50.0%) used podcasts, 1 (1.7%) contributed to a wiki, 6 (10.3%) wrote a blog and 18 (31.0%) read a blog. Non-consultants were more likely to use social networking and forums than consultants. Forty-one (70.7%) plastic surgeons used e-learning, and 31 (53.4%) would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS, whilst 5 (8.6%) would not and 22 (37.9%) do not know what Web 2.0 technology is. Most respondents either used Web 2.0 technology or were aware of it. Over half of respondents would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS. We recommend that BAPRAS adopts Web 2.0 technology in their development of e-LPRAS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)747–755
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Plastic Surgery
Volume35
Issue number10
Early online date15 Mar 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012
Event3rd Annual Meeting of the Burns and Plastic Surgery Section of the Society of Academic and Research Surgery - University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Duration: 5 Jan 2012 → …
Conference number: 3

Fingerprint

Social Media
Plastic Surgery
Internet
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Software
Technology
Learning
Consultants
Blogging
Social Networking
Postal Service
Esthetics
Plastics
Webcasts
Videoconferencing
Surgeons
Interpersonal Relations
Ireland
Telephone
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • plastic surgery
  • education
  • training
  • elearning

Cite this

Stevens, R. J. G., Hamilton, N. M., O'Donoghue, J. M., & Davies, M. P. (2012). The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons. European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 35(10), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z

The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons. / Stevens, Roger J G; Hamilton, Neil McLeod; O'Donoghue, J.M.; Davies, Michaela P.

In: European Journal of Plastic Surgery, Vol. 35, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 747–755.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stevens, RJG, Hamilton, NM, O'Donoghue, JM & Davies, MP 2012, 'The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons.', European Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z
Stevens, Roger J G ; Hamilton, Neil McLeod ; O'Donoghue, J.M. ; Davies, Michaela P. / The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons. In: European Journal of Plastic Surgery. 2012 ; Vol. 35, No. 10. pp. 747–755.
@article{dc8401b5589546d5ac668645dfe3522f,
title = "The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons.",
abstract = "Social software allows users to communicate and share data through online social interaction using Web 2.0 technology. Three hundred and fifty-six members of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) within the UK and Ireland were invited by e-mail to complete an online survey (e-survey) anonymously on their knowledge and use of Web 2.0 technology and whether they would like this to be used in BAPRAS’s e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). Fifty-eight members completed the e-survey (response rate of 58 out of 356 or 16.3{\%}). The respondents comprised 52 males (89.7{\%}) and 6 females (10.3{\%}) with a mean age (range) of 44.1 years (24–61). Forty one (70.7{\%}) were consultants and 17 (29.3{\%}) were non-consultants with a mean time (range) at this level of 10.1 years (1–30) and 3.4 years (1–6), respectively. The mean (range) ages of consultants and non-consultants were 48.7 years (35–61) and 32.8 years (24–38), respectively. Fifty-eight (100{\%}) plastic surgeons used the Internet and e-mail, 48 (82.8{\%}) owned a handheld device and 48 (82.8{\%}) owned a digital media player. Sixteen plastic surgeons (27.6{\%}) used instant messaging, 29 (50.0{\%}) used Internet telephone, 12 (20.7{\%}) used videoconferencing, 23 (39.7{\%}) used media sharing, 2 (3.4{\%}) used social bookmarking, 21 (36.2{\%}) used social networking, 24 (41.4{\%}) used forums, 29 (50.0{\%}) used podcasts, 1 (1.7{\%}) contributed to a wiki, 6 (10.3{\%}) wrote a blog and 18 (31.0{\%}) read a blog. Non-consultants were more likely to use social networking and forums than consultants. Forty-one (70.7{\%}) plastic surgeons used e-learning, and 31 (53.4{\%}) would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS, whilst 5 (8.6{\%}) would not and 22 (37.9{\%}) do not know what Web 2.0 technology is. Most respondents either used Web 2.0 technology or were aware of it. Over half of respondents would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS. We recommend that BAPRAS adopts Web 2.0 technology in their development of e-LPRAS.",
keywords = "plastic surgery, education, training, elearning",
author = "Stevens, {Roger J G} and Hamilton, {Neil McLeod} and J.M. O'Donoghue and Davies, {Michaela P}",
note = "This paper was partly presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Burns and Plastic Surgery Section of the Society of Academic and Research Surgery, 5 January, 2012, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Acknowledgements The authors thank the plastic surgeons who completed this survey, BAPRAS for approving this survey and emailing the members and Dr. Neil Scott who is Statistician in the Section of Population Health within the University of Aberdeen for his statistical advice. This research has contributed to a thesis for the degree of the Doctorate of Medicine of the University of Aberdeen.",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "747–755",
journal = "European Journal of Plastic Surgery",
issn = "0930-343X",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of the Internet and social software by plastic surgeons.

AU - Stevens, Roger J G

AU - Hamilton, Neil McLeod

AU - O'Donoghue, J.M.

AU - Davies, Michaela P

N1 - This paper was partly presented at the 3rd Annual Meeting of the Burns and Plastic Surgery Section of the Society of Academic and Research Surgery, 5 January, 2012, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Acknowledgements The authors thank the plastic surgeons who completed this survey, BAPRAS for approving this survey and emailing the members and Dr. Neil Scott who is Statistician in the Section of Population Health within the University of Aberdeen for his statistical advice. This research has contributed to a thesis for the degree of the Doctorate of Medicine of the University of Aberdeen.

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Social software allows users to communicate and share data through online social interaction using Web 2.0 technology. Three hundred and fifty-six members of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) within the UK and Ireland were invited by e-mail to complete an online survey (e-survey) anonymously on their knowledge and use of Web 2.0 technology and whether they would like this to be used in BAPRAS’s e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). Fifty-eight members completed the e-survey (response rate of 58 out of 356 or 16.3%). The respondents comprised 52 males (89.7%) and 6 females (10.3%) with a mean age (range) of 44.1 years (24–61). Forty one (70.7%) were consultants and 17 (29.3%) were non-consultants with a mean time (range) at this level of 10.1 years (1–30) and 3.4 years (1–6), respectively. The mean (range) ages of consultants and non-consultants were 48.7 years (35–61) and 32.8 years (24–38), respectively. Fifty-eight (100%) plastic surgeons used the Internet and e-mail, 48 (82.8%) owned a handheld device and 48 (82.8%) owned a digital media player. Sixteen plastic surgeons (27.6%) used instant messaging, 29 (50.0%) used Internet telephone, 12 (20.7%) used videoconferencing, 23 (39.7%) used media sharing, 2 (3.4%) used social bookmarking, 21 (36.2%) used social networking, 24 (41.4%) used forums, 29 (50.0%) used podcasts, 1 (1.7%) contributed to a wiki, 6 (10.3%) wrote a blog and 18 (31.0%) read a blog. Non-consultants were more likely to use social networking and forums than consultants. Forty-one (70.7%) plastic surgeons used e-learning, and 31 (53.4%) would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS, whilst 5 (8.6%) would not and 22 (37.9%) do not know what Web 2.0 technology is. Most respondents either used Web 2.0 technology or were aware of it. Over half of respondents would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS. We recommend that BAPRAS adopts Web 2.0 technology in their development of e-LPRAS.

AB - Social software allows users to communicate and share data through online social interaction using Web 2.0 technology. Three hundred and fifty-six members of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) within the UK and Ireland were invited by e-mail to complete an online survey (e-survey) anonymously on their knowledge and use of Web 2.0 technology and whether they would like this to be used in BAPRAS’s e-Learning for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (e-LPRAS). Fifty-eight members completed the e-survey (response rate of 58 out of 356 or 16.3%). The respondents comprised 52 males (89.7%) and 6 females (10.3%) with a mean age (range) of 44.1 years (24–61). Forty one (70.7%) were consultants and 17 (29.3%) were non-consultants with a mean time (range) at this level of 10.1 years (1–30) and 3.4 years (1–6), respectively. The mean (range) ages of consultants and non-consultants were 48.7 years (35–61) and 32.8 years (24–38), respectively. Fifty-eight (100%) plastic surgeons used the Internet and e-mail, 48 (82.8%) owned a handheld device and 48 (82.8%) owned a digital media player. Sixteen plastic surgeons (27.6%) used instant messaging, 29 (50.0%) used Internet telephone, 12 (20.7%) used videoconferencing, 23 (39.7%) used media sharing, 2 (3.4%) used social bookmarking, 21 (36.2%) used social networking, 24 (41.4%) used forums, 29 (50.0%) used podcasts, 1 (1.7%) contributed to a wiki, 6 (10.3%) wrote a blog and 18 (31.0%) read a blog. Non-consultants were more likely to use social networking and forums than consultants. Forty-one (70.7%) plastic surgeons used e-learning, and 31 (53.4%) would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS, whilst 5 (8.6%) would not and 22 (37.9%) do not know what Web 2.0 technology is. Most respondents either used Web 2.0 technology or were aware of it. Over half of respondents would like Web 2.0 technology to be used in e-LPRAS. We recommend that BAPRAS adopts Web 2.0 technology in their development of e-LPRAS.

KW - plastic surgery

KW - education

KW - training

KW - elearning

U2 - 10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z

DO - 10.1007/s00238-011-0681-z

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 747

EP - 755

JO - European Journal of Plastic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Plastic Surgery

SN - 0930-343X

IS - 10

ER -