The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions

Christopher D Burton (Corresponding Author), Vikki Entwistle, Alison M Elliott, Nicolas Krucien, Terry Porteous, Mandy Ryan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)


Objective: To measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care.
Design: We systematically identified four attributes of person-centred care. We then measured their value to 923 people with either chronic pain or chronic lung disease over three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) about services to support self-management. We calculated the value of each attribute for all respondents, and identified groups of people with similar preferences using latent class modelling.
Setting: DCEs conducted online via a commercial survey company.
Participants: Adults with either chronic pain (two DCEs, N= 517 and 206 respectively) or breathlessness due to chronic respiratory disease (N=200).
Results: Participants were more likely to choose services with higher level person-centred attributes. They most valued services that took account of a person’s current situation (likelihood of selection increased by 16.9%; 95%CI 15.4 to 18.3) and worked with the person on what they wanted to get from life (15.8%; 14.5 to 17.1). More personally relevant information was valued less than these (12.3%; 11.0 to 13.6). A friendly and personal communicative style was valued least (3.8%; 2.7 to 4.8). Latent class models indicated that a substantial minority of participants valued personally relevant information over the other attributes.
Conclusion: This is the first study to measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care. Professional training needs to emphasise the substance of clinical communication –working responsively with individuals on what matters to them – as well as the style of its delivery.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere015689
JournalBMJ Open
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 26 Apr 2017


Cite this