Abstract
Objective: To measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care.
Design: We systematically identified four attributes of person-centred care. We then measured their value to 923 people with either chronic pain or chronic lung disease over three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) about services to support self-management. We calculated the value of each attribute for all respondents, and identified groups of people with similar preferences using latent class modelling.
Setting: DCEs conducted online via a commercial survey company.
Participants: Adults with either chronic pain (two DCEs, N= 517 and 206 respectively) or breathlessness due to chronic respiratory disease (N=200).
Results: Participants were more likely to choose services with higher level person-centred attributes. They most valued services that took account of a person’s current situation (likelihood of selection increased by 16.9%; 95%CI 15.4 to 18.3) and worked with the person on what they wanted to get from life (15.8%; 14.5 to 17.1). More personally relevant information was valued less than these (12.3%; 11.0 to 13.6). A friendly and personal communicative style was valued least (3.8%; 2.7 to 4.8). Latent class models indicated that a substantial minority of participants valued personally relevant information over the other attributes.
Conclusion: This is the first study to measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care. Professional training needs to emphasise the substance of clinical communication –working responsively with individuals on what matters to them – as well as the style of its delivery.
Design: We systematically identified four attributes of person-centred care. We then measured their value to 923 people with either chronic pain or chronic lung disease over three discrete choice experiments (DCEs) about services to support self-management. We calculated the value of each attribute for all respondents, and identified groups of people with similar preferences using latent class modelling.
Setting: DCEs conducted online via a commercial survey company.
Participants: Adults with either chronic pain (two DCEs, N= 517 and 206 respectively) or breathlessness due to chronic respiratory disease (N=200).
Results: Participants were more likely to choose services with higher level person-centred attributes. They most valued services that took account of a person’s current situation (likelihood of selection increased by 16.9%; 95%CI 15.4 to 18.3) and worked with the person on what they wanted to get from life (15.8%; 14.5 to 17.1). More personally relevant information was valued less than these (12.3%; 11.0 to 13.6). A friendly and personal communicative style was valued least (3.8%; 2.7 to 4.8). Latent class models indicated that a substantial minority of participants valued personally relevant information over the other attributes.
Conclusion: This is the first study to measure the value patients place on different aspects of person-centred care. Professional training needs to emphasise the substance of clinical communication –working responsively with individuals on what matters to them – as well as the style of its delivery.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | e015689 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 26 Apr 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Mandy Ryan
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, Health Economics Research Unit - Director of H E R U
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences
Person: Academic