The way it really happened: competing narratives in the political process of technological change

Patrick Mark Dawson, D. Buchanan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Corporate narratives concerning technological change are often constructed around a linear event sequence that presents the organization in a positive light to internal and external observers. These narratives often sanitize the change process, and present data from which commentators can formulate neat linear prescriptions on how to implement new technology. In contrast, this article draws on processual-contextual theoretical perspectives to argue that technological change is a more complex political process represented by multiple versions of events which compete with each other for dominance as definitive change accounts. It also calls for an analysis of narratives over time (before, during and after change) in seeking to demonstrate the analytical significance of identifying and unpacking the multiple interpretive frameworks that are utilized in organizational struggles over technology and change at work. These struggles draw attention to the ways in which power is exercised through the construction and management of compelling stories that shape change. It is the contribution of these stories (competing narratives) to understanding the political process of technological change, that is the focus of this article.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-865
Number of pages20
JournalHuman Relations
Volume58
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Keywords

  • change
  • narratives
  • politics
  • processual
  • technology
  • WORK

Cite this

The way it really happened: competing narratives in the political process of technological change. / Dawson, Patrick Mark; Buchanan, D.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 58, No. 7, 2005, p. 845-865.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dawson, Patrick Mark ; Buchanan, D. / The way it really happened: competing narratives in the political process of technological change. In: Human Relations. 2005 ; Vol. 58, No. 7. pp. 845-865.
@article{005e01e94f0842d4a047048662995149,
title = "The way it really happened: competing narratives in the political process of technological change",
abstract = "Corporate narratives concerning technological change are often constructed around a linear event sequence that presents the organization in a positive light to internal and external observers. These narratives often sanitize the change process, and present data from which commentators can formulate neat linear prescriptions on how to implement new technology. In contrast, this article draws on processual-contextual theoretical perspectives to argue that technological change is a more complex political process represented by multiple versions of events which compete with each other for dominance as definitive change accounts. It also calls for an analysis of narratives over time (before, during and after change) in seeking to demonstrate the analytical significance of identifying and unpacking the multiple interpretive frameworks that are utilized in organizational struggles over technology and change at work. These struggles draw attention to the ways in which power is exercised through the construction and management of compelling stories that shape change. It is the contribution of these stories (competing narratives) to understanding the political process of technological change, that is the focus of this article.",
keywords = "change, narratives, politics, processual, technology, WORK",
author = "Dawson, {Patrick Mark} and D. Buchanan",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1177/0018726705057807",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "845--865",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The way it really happened: competing narratives in the political process of technological change

AU - Dawson, Patrick Mark

AU - Buchanan, D.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Corporate narratives concerning technological change are often constructed around a linear event sequence that presents the organization in a positive light to internal and external observers. These narratives often sanitize the change process, and present data from which commentators can formulate neat linear prescriptions on how to implement new technology. In contrast, this article draws on processual-contextual theoretical perspectives to argue that technological change is a more complex political process represented by multiple versions of events which compete with each other for dominance as definitive change accounts. It also calls for an analysis of narratives over time (before, during and after change) in seeking to demonstrate the analytical significance of identifying and unpacking the multiple interpretive frameworks that are utilized in organizational struggles over technology and change at work. These struggles draw attention to the ways in which power is exercised through the construction and management of compelling stories that shape change. It is the contribution of these stories (competing narratives) to understanding the political process of technological change, that is the focus of this article.

AB - Corporate narratives concerning technological change are often constructed around a linear event sequence that presents the organization in a positive light to internal and external observers. These narratives often sanitize the change process, and present data from which commentators can formulate neat linear prescriptions on how to implement new technology. In contrast, this article draws on processual-contextual theoretical perspectives to argue that technological change is a more complex political process represented by multiple versions of events which compete with each other for dominance as definitive change accounts. It also calls for an analysis of narratives over time (before, during and after change) in seeking to demonstrate the analytical significance of identifying and unpacking the multiple interpretive frameworks that are utilized in organizational struggles over technology and change at work. These struggles draw attention to the ways in which power is exercised through the construction and management of compelling stories that shape change. It is the contribution of these stories (competing narratives) to understanding the political process of technological change, that is the focus of this article.

KW - change

KW - narratives

KW - politics

KW - processual

KW - technology

KW - WORK

U2 - 10.1177/0018726705057807

DO - 10.1177/0018726705057807

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 845

EP - 865

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 7

ER -