The Work of Monuments

Reflections on Spatial, Temporal and Social Orientations in Mongolia and the Maya Lowlands

Sarah E. Jackson, Joshua Wright

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we look at two very different contexts of monument use – Bronze Age Inner Asia and the Classic period Maya lowlands – in order to explore the function and meanings of monuments and the variety of ways in which they worked to mark and differentiate ancient landscapes. Our goal in uniting such disparate contexts is to examine how power and social organization in these settings were translated into monumental material forms, and how such materializations were experienced by those who viewed and re-interpreted the monuments. In particular, we explore how monuments acted as orientational markers within specific cultural contexts. Our discussion finds common ground between the disparate settings through several common interpretive frameworks focused on spatial, temporal and social orientational work accomplished by active, agentive monuments through their relationships with humans, which we frame as a ‘technology of the monument’. Monuments are instrumental in situating groups within these different layers, or landscapes, of lived experience, yet even while physically fixed, allow for movement through changing meanings and ideas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)117-140
Number of pages24
JournalCambridge Archaeological Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Mongolia
monument
Maya Lowlands
social work
organization
experience

Keywords

  • MESO
  • MEGALITH MON
  • BRONZE
  • MAYA
  • LANDSCAPE

Cite this

The Work of Monuments : Reflections on Spatial, Temporal and Social Orientations in Mongolia and the Maya Lowlands. / Jackson, Sarah E.; Wright, Joshua.

In: Cambridge Archaeological Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 117-140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{690062572dbb4290a0f3ca7211715263,
title = "The Work of Monuments: Reflections on Spatial, Temporal and Social Orientations in Mongolia and the Maya Lowlands",
abstract = "In this article, we look at two very different contexts of monument use – Bronze Age Inner Asia and the Classic period Maya lowlands – in order to explore the function and meanings of monuments and the variety of ways in which they worked to mark and differentiate ancient landscapes. Our goal in uniting such disparate contexts is to examine how power and social organization in these settings were translated into monumental material forms, and how such materializations were experienced by those who viewed and re-interpreted the monuments. In particular, we explore how monuments acted as orientational markers within specific cultural contexts. Our discussion finds common ground between the disparate settings through several common interpretive frameworks focused on spatial, temporal and social orientational work accomplished by active, agentive monuments through their relationships with humans, which we frame as a ‘technology of the monument’. Monuments are instrumental in situating groups within these different layers, or landscapes, of lived experience, yet even while physically fixed, allow for movement through changing meanings and ideas.",
keywords = "MESO , MEGALITH MON , BRONZE , MAYA , LANDSCAPE",
author = "Jackson, {Sarah E.} and Joshua Wright",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1017/S0959774314000018",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "117--140",
journal = "Cambridge Archaeological Journal",
issn = "0959-7743",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Work of Monuments

T2 - Reflections on Spatial, Temporal and Social Orientations in Mongolia and the Maya Lowlands

AU - Jackson, Sarah E.

AU - Wright, Joshua

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - In this article, we look at two very different contexts of monument use – Bronze Age Inner Asia and the Classic period Maya lowlands – in order to explore the function and meanings of monuments and the variety of ways in which they worked to mark and differentiate ancient landscapes. Our goal in uniting such disparate contexts is to examine how power and social organization in these settings were translated into monumental material forms, and how such materializations were experienced by those who viewed and re-interpreted the monuments. In particular, we explore how monuments acted as orientational markers within specific cultural contexts. Our discussion finds common ground between the disparate settings through several common interpretive frameworks focused on spatial, temporal and social orientational work accomplished by active, agentive monuments through their relationships with humans, which we frame as a ‘technology of the monument’. Monuments are instrumental in situating groups within these different layers, or landscapes, of lived experience, yet even while physically fixed, allow for movement through changing meanings and ideas.

AB - In this article, we look at two very different contexts of monument use – Bronze Age Inner Asia and the Classic period Maya lowlands – in order to explore the function and meanings of monuments and the variety of ways in which they worked to mark and differentiate ancient landscapes. Our goal in uniting such disparate contexts is to examine how power and social organization in these settings were translated into monumental material forms, and how such materializations were experienced by those who viewed and re-interpreted the monuments. In particular, we explore how monuments acted as orientational markers within specific cultural contexts. Our discussion finds common ground between the disparate settings through several common interpretive frameworks focused on spatial, temporal and social orientational work accomplished by active, agentive monuments through their relationships with humans, which we frame as a ‘technology of the monument’. Monuments are instrumental in situating groups within these different layers, or landscapes, of lived experience, yet even while physically fixed, allow for movement through changing meanings and ideas.

KW - MESO

KW - MEGALITH MON

KW - BRONZE

KW - MAYA

KW - LANDSCAPE

U2 - 10.1017/S0959774314000018

DO - 10.1017/S0959774314000018

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 117

EP - 140

JO - Cambridge Archaeological Journal

JF - Cambridge Archaeological Journal

SN - 0959-7743

IS - 1

ER -