Abstract
Abstract Early Career Researchers (ECRs) encounter distinctive opportunities (and challenges) within the neoliberal academy. In this commentary, we reflect on issues common to ECR experiences in quantitative human geography. Our discussion is inspired by and develops conversations from a panel at the Royal Geographical Society Institute of British Geographers (RGS-IBG) postgraduate forum, with panelists from across the subfield. Whilst many aspects of the ECR experience transcend sub-disciplinary boundaries, the quantitative subfield presents unique dynamics for ECRs to navigate. ECRs in quantitative geography are steeped in ?data science?, which changes relations between academia and industry, with the growth of our field increasing the size and the scope of what ECRs might be expected to know and do. Bringing together reflections from the panel, we highlight the variation in pathways experienced by ECRs, reflecting on opportunities, uncertainties and mentorship, in the hope of offering insights and advice for prospective and current ECRs and their mentors.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 174-181 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | The Geographical Journal |
Volume | 189 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 9 Dec 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2023 |
Bibliographical note
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12499Data Availability Statement
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENTNo data were used in this commentary.
Keywords
- early career research
- panel discussion
- quantitative human geography
- spatial data science