To provide or not to provide treatment? That is the question

Niina Kolehmainen, Jill Francis, Lorna McKee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is generally accepted that whether or not a client receives occupational therapy should be based on the client's needs, not on the therapist that the client sees. However, in the United Kingdom there is little evidence to show that treatment provision is similar between therapists or even that therapists share a common rationale for providing treatment. This research investigated paediatric occupational therapists' beliefs about and intentions to provide treatment for children with coordination difficulties.

Ten paediatric occupational therapists were recruited from two National Health Service Scotland Health Boards. The data were collected at one time point. Intentions and beliefs about treatment provision were explored and measured both at general and at case (situation-specific) levels. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently. Statistical and thematic approaches to analysis were applied.

The findings showed that the therapists shared similar general intentions and beliefs about providing treatment. However, the situation-specific intentions to provide treatment varied considerably between the therapists. The situation-specific intentions were characterised by consideration of the client's individual circumstances and a variation in the interpretations made about the information available. The beliefs that possibly contributed to the variation in the situation-specific intentions were also identified. This research informs the occupational therapy profession about issues related to the expectation that treatment provision is similar between therapists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)510-523
Number of pages14
JournalBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume71
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Occupational Therapy
Therapeutics
Pediatrics
National Health Programs
Scotland
Research
Health
Occupational Therapists
United Kingdom

Keywords

  • occupational therapy
  • children
  • intention
  • beliefs
  • theory of planned behavior

Cite this

To provide or not to provide treatment? That is the question. / Kolehmainen, Niina; Francis, Jill; McKee, Lorna.

In: British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 71, No. 12, 2008, p. 510-523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kolehmainen, Niina ; Francis, Jill ; McKee, Lorna. / To provide or not to provide treatment? That is the question. In: British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2008 ; Vol. 71, No. 12. pp. 510-523.
@article{7ec5cba2ce1e41cd8757b3e75c1cad2b,
title = "To provide or not to provide treatment? That is the question",
abstract = "It is generally accepted that whether or not a client receives occupational therapy should be based on the client's needs, not on the therapist that the client sees. However, in the United Kingdom there is little evidence to show that treatment provision is similar between therapists or even that therapists share a common rationale for providing treatment. This research investigated paediatric occupational therapists' beliefs about and intentions to provide treatment for children with coordination difficulties. Ten paediatric occupational therapists were recruited from two National Health Service Scotland Health Boards. The data were collected at one time point. Intentions and beliefs about treatment provision were explored and measured both at general and at case (situation-specific) levels. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently. Statistical and thematic approaches to analysis were applied. The findings showed that the therapists shared similar general intentions and beliefs about providing treatment. However, the situation-specific intentions to provide treatment varied considerably between the therapists. The situation-specific intentions were characterised by consideration of the client's individual circumstances and a variation in the interpretations made about the information available. The beliefs that possibly contributed to the variation in the situation-specific intentions were also identified. This research informs the occupational therapy profession about issues related to the expectation that treatment provision is similar between therapists.",
keywords = "occupational therapy, children, intention, beliefs, theory of planned behavior",
author = "Niina Kolehmainen and Jill Francis and Lorna McKee",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1177/030802260807101202",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "510--523",
journal = "British Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0308-0226",
publisher = "British Journal of Occupational Therapy",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - To provide or not to provide treatment? That is the question

AU - Kolehmainen, Niina

AU - Francis, Jill

AU - McKee, Lorna

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - It is generally accepted that whether or not a client receives occupational therapy should be based on the client's needs, not on the therapist that the client sees. However, in the United Kingdom there is little evidence to show that treatment provision is similar between therapists or even that therapists share a common rationale for providing treatment. This research investigated paediatric occupational therapists' beliefs about and intentions to provide treatment for children with coordination difficulties. Ten paediatric occupational therapists were recruited from two National Health Service Scotland Health Boards. The data were collected at one time point. Intentions and beliefs about treatment provision were explored and measured both at general and at case (situation-specific) levels. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently. Statistical and thematic approaches to analysis were applied. The findings showed that the therapists shared similar general intentions and beliefs about providing treatment. However, the situation-specific intentions to provide treatment varied considerably between the therapists. The situation-specific intentions were characterised by consideration of the client's individual circumstances and a variation in the interpretations made about the information available. The beliefs that possibly contributed to the variation in the situation-specific intentions were also identified. This research informs the occupational therapy profession about issues related to the expectation that treatment provision is similar between therapists.

AB - It is generally accepted that whether or not a client receives occupational therapy should be based on the client's needs, not on the therapist that the client sees. However, in the United Kingdom there is little evidence to show that treatment provision is similar between therapists or even that therapists share a common rationale for providing treatment. This research investigated paediatric occupational therapists' beliefs about and intentions to provide treatment for children with coordination difficulties. Ten paediatric occupational therapists were recruited from two National Health Service Scotland Health Boards. The data were collected at one time point. Intentions and beliefs about treatment provision were explored and measured both at general and at case (situation-specific) levels. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected concurrently. Statistical and thematic approaches to analysis were applied. The findings showed that the therapists shared similar general intentions and beliefs about providing treatment. However, the situation-specific intentions to provide treatment varied considerably between the therapists. The situation-specific intentions were characterised by consideration of the client's individual circumstances and a variation in the interpretations made about the information available. The beliefs that possibly contributed to the variation in the situation-specific intentions were also identified. This research informs the occupational therapy profession about issues related to the expectation that treatment provision is similar between therapists.

KW - occupational therapy

KW - children

KW - intention

KW - beliefs

KW - theory of planned behavior

U2 - 10.1177/030802260807101202

DO - 10.1177/030802260807101202

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 510

EP - 523

JO - British Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - British Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0308-0226

IS - 12

ER -