Too Comfortable in the Saddle? The Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance

Yameng Zhang , Trevor Buck, J. Ignacio Canales , Stephan von Delft

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between CEO tenure and the attributions that boards make regarding performance, i.e. it analyzes the causes of poor performance as interpreted by boards. This is important because several studies have focused on boards’ disciplinary actions while discussing whether boards are able to hold long-tenured CEOs accountable for poor firm performance. However, less attention has been directed at boards’ attributions of poor performance that may precede such actions. Board attribution data was collected from 973 annual reports of poorly performing Chinese high-tech listed firms between 2007 and 2013. Findings show that, with longer CEO tenure, boards are actually more likely to attribute poor performance to internal, CEO-related factors, rather than to external, environment-related ones. These findings are consistent with the assumption that CEOs’ increasing obsolescence with tenure possibly weakens boards’ allegiances towards CEOs, and decreases CEO influence over board attributions of poor performance. The moderating effects found for instability of prior performance and industry dynamism largely support this explanation. The study contributes to the board governance literature by highlighting the role of cognition prior to disciplinary behavior in board governance.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAcademy of Management Proceedings
Volume2017
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

CEO tenure
Attribution
Chief executive officer
Governance
Moderating effect
Factors
Cognition
Industry
Obsolescence
Tenure
Firm performance
Annual reports
Dynamism
External environment
High-tech

Cite this

Too Comfortable in the Saddle? The Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance. / Zhang , Yameng; Buck, Trevor; Canales , J. Ignacio ; von Delft, Stephan.

In: Academy of Management Proceedings, Vol. 2017, No. 1, 30.11.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{09cf30cd0e374f76a58fc058ba7a869d,
title = "Too Comfortable in the Saddle? The Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance",
abstract = "This paper studies the relationship between CEO tenure and the attributions that boards make regarding performance, i.e. it analyzes the causes of poor performance as interpreted by boards. This is important because several studies have focused on boards’ disciplinary actions while discussing whether boards are able to hold long-tenured CEOs accountable for poor firm performance. However, less attention has been directed at boards’ attributions of poor performance that may precede such actions. Board attribution data was collected from 973 annual reports of poorly performing Chinese high-tech listed firms between 2007 and 2013. Findings show that, with longer CEO tenure, boards are actually more likely to attribute poor performance to internal, CEO-related factors, rather than to external, environment-related ones. These findings are consistent with the assumption that CEOs’ increasing obsolescence with tenure possibly weakens boards’ allegiances towards CEOs, and decreases CEO influence over board attributions of poor performance. The moderating effects found for instability of prior performance and industry dynamism largely support this explanation. The study contributes to the board governance literature by highlighting the role of cognition prior to disciplinary behavior in board governance.",
author = "Yameng Zhang and Trevor Buck and Canales, {J. Ignacio} and {von Delft}, Stephan",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.5465/AMBPP.2017.11912abstract",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
journal = "Academy of Management Proceedings",
issn = "0065-0668",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Too Comfortable in the Saddle? The Effect of CEO Tenure on Board Attributions of Poor Performance

AU - Zhang , Yameng

AU - Buck, Trevor

AU - Canales , J. Ignacio

AU - von Delft, Stephan

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - This paper studies the relationship between CEO tenure and the attributions that boards make regarding performance, i.e. it analyzes the causes of poor performance as interpreted by boards. This is important because several studies have focused on boards’ disciplinary actions while discussing whether boards are able to hold long-tenured CEOs accountable for poor firm performance. However, less attention has been directed at boards’ attributions of poor performance that may precede such actions. Board attribution data was collected from 973 annual reports of poorly performing Chinese high-tech listed firms between 2007 and 2013. Findings show that, with longer CEO tenure, boards are actually more likely to attribute poor performance to internal, CEO-related factors, rather than to external, environment-related ones. These findings are consistent with the assumption that CEOs’ increasing obsolescence with tenure possibly weakens boards’ allegiances towards CEOs, and decreases CEO influence over board attributions of poor performance. The moderating effects found for instability of prior performance and industry dynamism largely support this explanation. The study contributes to the board governance literature by highlighting the role of cognition prior to disciplinary behavior in board governance.

AB - This paper studies the relationship between CEO tenure and the attributions that boards make regarding performance, i.e. it analyzes the causes of poor performance as interpreted by boards. This is important because several studies have focused on boards’ disciplinary actions while discussing whether boards are able to hold long-tenured CEOs accountable for poor firm performance. However, less attention has been directed at boards’ attributions of poor performance that may precede such actions. Board attribution data was collected from 973 annual reports of poorly performing Chinese high-tech listed firms between 2007 and 2013. Findings show that, with longer CEO tenure, boards are actually more likely to attribute poor performance to internal, CEO-related factors, rather than to external, environment-related ones. These findings are consistent with the assumption that CEOs’ increasing obsolescence with tenure possibly weakens boards’ allegiances towards CEOs, and decreases CEO influence over board attributions of poor performance. The moderating effects found for instability of prior performance and industry dynamism largely support this explanation. The study contributes to the board governance literature by highlighting the role of cognition prior to disciplinary behavior in board governance.

U2 - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.11912abstract

DO - 10.5465/AMBPP.2017.11912abstract

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

JO - Academy of Management Proceedings

JF - Academy of Management Proceedings

SN - 0065-0668

IS - 1

ER -