Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

David Beard, Andrew Price, Jonathan Cook, Ray Fitzpatrick, Andrew Carr, Marion Campbell, Helen Doll, Helen Campbell, Nigel Arden, Cushla Cooper, Loretta Davies, David Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.
Original languageEnglish
Article number292
JournalTrials
Volume14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Knee
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis
Pathology
Surgeons
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • medical compartment osteoarthritis
  • total knee replacement
  • unicompartmental knee replacement
  • equipoise
  • expertise

Cite this

Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT : study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. / Beard, David; Price, Andrew; Cook, Jonathan; Fitzpatrick, Ray; Carr, Andrew; Campbell, Marion; Doll, Helen; Campbell, Helen; Arden, Nigel; Cooper, Cushla; Davies, Loretta; Murray, David.

In: Trials, Vol. 14, 292, 12.09.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beard, D, Price, A, Cook, J, Fitzpatrick, R, Carr, A, Campbell, M, Doll, H, Campbell, H, Arden, N, Cooper, C, Davies, L & Murray, D 2013, 'Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial', Trials, vol. 14, 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292
Beard, David ; Price, Andrew ; Cook, Jonathan ; Fitzpatrick, Ray ; Carr, Andrew ; Campbell, Marion ; Doll, Helen ; Campbell, Helen ; Arden, Nigel ; Cooper, Cushla ; Davies, Loretta ; Murray, David. / Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT : study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. In: Trials. 2013 ; Vol. 14.
@article{b03c6f8468394c428565e672d1835869,
title = "Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.",
keywords = "medical compartment osteoarthritis, total knee replacement, unicompartmental knee replacement, equipoise, expertise",
author = "David Beard and Andrew Price and Jonathan Cook and Ray Fitzpatrick and Andrew Carr and Marion Campbell and Helen Doll and Helen Campbell and Nigel Arden and Cushla Cooper and Loretta Davies and David Murray",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-14-292",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial - TOPKAT

T2 - study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

AU - Beard, David

AU - Price, Andrew

AU - Cook, Jonathan

AU - Fitzpatrick, Ray

AU - Carr, Andrew

AU - Campbell, Marion

AU - Doll, Helen

AU - Campbell, Helen

AU - Arden, Nigel

AU - Cooper, Cushla

AU - Davies, Loretta

AU - Murray, David

PY - 2013/9/12

Y1 - 2013/9/12

N2 - In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.

AB - In the majority of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee the disease originates in the medial compartment. There are two fundamentally different approaches to knee replacement for patients with unicompartmental disease: some surgeons feel that it is always best to replace both the knee compartments with a total knee replacement (TKR); whereas others feel it is best to replace just the damaged component of the knee using a partial or unicompartment replacement (UKR). Both interventions are established and well-documented procedures. Little evidence exists to prove the clinical and cost-effectiveness of either management option. This provides an explanation for the high variation in treatment of choice by individual surgeons for the same knee pathology.The aim of the TOPKAT study will be to assess the clinical and cost effectiveness of TKRs compared to UKRs in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis.

KW - medical compartment osteoarthritis

KW - total knee replacement

KW - unicompartmental knee replacement

KW - equipoise

KW - expertise

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-292

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-292

M3 - Article

C2 - 24028414

VL - 14

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 292

ER -