Toward a trans-scalar peace system

challenging complex global conflict systems

Gearoid Millar (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Peacebuilding scholarship has not responded adequately to critiques of peacebuilding practice. This failure results from two related problems; an implicit assumption of a dichotomous relationship between conflict and peace, and an attendant failure to appreciate the challenges posed by complex global conflict systems. Stuck debating the dynamics of specific interventions in single states, the field has failed to fully appreciate how much conflict and peace are mutually constitutive across contexts and how underlying legitimating logics driving contemporary conflict transcend borders and reach across scales. Therefore, this paper argues, we must fully accept a more nuanced, trans-national, and trans-scalar conception of how conflict and peace are interrelated within states, internationally, and globally. The goal of the paper, therefore, is to tie together disparate arguments within the field to encourage new thinking regarding peacebuilding and more a holistic conception of a trans-scalar global peace system to replace the prevailing global conflict system.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalPeacebuilding
Early online date24 Jun 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 24 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

peace
border conflict
conflict

Keywords

  • Conflict
  • Peacebuilding
  • Peace Systems
  • Trans-Scalar
  • Complexity Theory

Cite this

@article{1bdc11ab02b846cc85e008e302a5ebd2,
title = "Toward a trans-scalar peace system: challenging complex global conflict systems",
abstract = "Peacebuilding scholarship has not responded adequately to critiques of peacebuilding practice. This failure results from two related problems; an implicit assumption of a dichotomous relationship between conflict and peace, and an attendant failure to appreciate the challenges posed by complex global conflict systems. Stuck debating the dynamics of specific interventions in single states, the field has failed to fully appreciate how much conflict and peace are mutually constitutive across contexts and how underlying legitimating logics driving contemporary conflict transcend borders and reach across scales. Therefore, this paper argues, we must fully accept a more nuanced, trans-national, and trans-scalar conception of how conflict and peace are interrelated within states, internationally, and globally. The goal of the paper, therefore, is to tie together disparate arguments within the field to encourage new thinking regarding peacebuilding and more a holistic conception of a trans-scalar global peace system to replace the prevailing global conflict system.",
keywords = "Conflict, Peacebuilding, Peace Systems, Trans-Scalar, Complexity Theory",
author = "Gearoid Millar",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1080/21647259.2019.1634866",
language = "English",
journal = "Peacebuilding",
issn = "2164-7259",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a trans-scalar peace system

T2 - challenging complex global conflict systems

AU - Millar, Gearoid

PY - 2019/6/24

Y1 - 2019/6/24

N2 - Peacebuilding scholarship has not responded adequately to critiques of peacebuilding practice. This failure results from two related problems; an implicit assumption of a dichotomous relationship between conflict and peace, and an attendant failure to appreciate the challenges posed by complex global conflict systems. Stuck debating the dynamics of specific interventions in single states, the field has failed to fully appreciate how much conflict and peace are mutually constitutive across contexts and how underlying legitimating logics driving contemporary conflict transcend borders and reach across scales. Therefore, this paper argues, we must fully accept a more nuanced, trans-national, and trans-scalar conception of how conflict and peace are interrelated within states, internationally, and globally. The goal of the paper, therefore, is to tie together disparate arguments within the field to encourage new thinking regarding peacebuilding and more a holistic conception of a trans-scalar global peace system to replace the prevailing global conflict system.

AB - Peacebuilding scholarship has not responded adequately to critiques of peacebuilding practice. This failure results from two related problems; an implicit assumption of a dichotomous relationship between conflict and peace, and an attendant failure to appreciate the challenges posed by complex global conflict systems. Stuck debating the dynamics of specific interventions in single states, the field has failed to fully appreciate how much conflict and peace are mutually constitutive across contexts and how underlying legitimating logics driving contemporary conflict transcend borders and reach across scales. Therefore, this paper argues, we must fully accept a more nuanced, trans-national, and trans-scalar conception of how conflict and peace are interrelated within states, internationally, and globally. The goal of the paper, therefore, is to tie together disparate arguments within the field to encourage new thinking regarding peacebuilding and more a holistic conception of a trans-scalar global peace system to replace the prevailing global conflict system.

KW - Conflict

KW - Peacebuilding

KW - Peace Systems

KW - Trans-Scalar

KW - Complexity Theory

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21647259.2019.1634866

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/toward-transscalar-peace-system-challenging-complex-global-conflict-systems

U2 - 10.1080/21647259.2019.1634866

DO - 10.1080/21647259.2019.1634866

M3 - Article

JO - Peacebuilding

JF - Peacebuilding

SN - 2164-7259

ER -