Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 10652-10674 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Ecology and Evolution |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 24 |
| Early online date | 6 Nov 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2017 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- BEF-China
- forest biodiversity experiments
- high-throughput methods
- multitrophic interactions
- standardized protocols
Cite this
Towards a methodical framework for comprehensively assessing forest multifunctionality. / Trogisch, Stefan (Corresponding Author); Schuldt, Andreas; Bauhaus, Juergen; Blum, Juliet; Both, Sabine; Buscot, Francois; Castro-Izaguirre, Nadia; Chesters, Douglas; Durka, Walter; Eichenberg, David; Erfmeier, Alexandra; Fischer, Markus; Geissler, Christian; Germany, Markus; Goebes, Philipp; Gutknecht, Jessica; Hahn, Christoph Zacharias; Haider, Sylvia; Haerdtle, Werner; He, Jin-Sheng; Hector, Andy; Hoenig, Lydia; Huang, Yuanyuan; Klein, Alexandra-Maria; Kuehn, Peter; Kunz, Matthias; Leppert, Katrin; Li, Ying; Liu, Xiaojuan; Niklaus, Pascal; Pei, Zhiqin; Pietsch, Katherina; Prinz, Ricarda; Pross, Tobias; Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael; Schmidt, Karsten; Scholten, Thomas; Seitz, Steffen; Song, Zhengshan; Staab, Michael; von Oheimb, Goddert; Weissbecker, Christina; Welk, Erik; Wirth, Christian; Wubet, Tesfaye; Yang, Bo; Yang, Xuefei; Zhu, Chao-Dong; Schmid, Bernhard; Ma, Keping; Bruelheide, Helge.
In: Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 7, No. 24, 12.2017, p. 10652-10674.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a methodical framework for comprehensively assessing forest multifunctionality
AU - Trogisch, Stefan
AU - Schuldt, Andreas
AU - Bauhaus, Juergen
AU - Blum, Juliet
AU - Both, Sabine
AU - Buscot, Francois
AU - Castro-Izaguirre, Nadia
AU - Chesters, Douglas
AU - Durka, Walter
AU - Eichenberg, David
AU - Erfmeier, Alexandra
AU - Fischer, Markus
AU - Geissler, Christian
AU - Germany, Markus
AU - Goebes, Philipp
AU - Gutknecht, Jessica
AU - Hahn, Christoph Zacharias
AU - Haider, Sylvia
AU - Haerdtle, Werner
AU - He, Jin-Sheng
AU - Hector, Andy
AU - Hoenig, Lydia
AU - Huang, Yuanyuan
AU - Klein, Alexandra-Maria
AU - Kuehn, Peter
AU - Kunz, Matthias
AU - Leppert, Katrin
AU - Li, Ying
AU - Liu, Xiaojuan
AU - Niklaus, Pascal
AU - Pei, Zhiqin
AU - Pietsch, Katherina
AU - Prinz, Ricarda
AU - Pross, Tobias
AU - Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael
AU - Schmidt, Karsten
AU - Scholten, Thomas
AU - Seitz, Steffen
AU - Song, Zhengshan
AU - Staab, Michael
AU - von Oheimb, Goddert
AU - Weissbecker, Christina
AU - Welk, Erik
AU - Wirth, Christian
AU - Wubet, Tesfaye
AU - Yang, Bo
AU - Yang, Xuefei
AU - Zhu, Chao-Dong
AU - Schmid, Bernhard
AU - Ma, Keping
AU - Bruelheide, Helge
N1 - Funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Grant Number: DFG FOR 891/1-3 National Natural Science Foundation of China. Grant Numbers: 30710103907, 30930005, 31170457, 31210103910 Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) Sino-German Centre for Research Promotion in Beijing. Grant Number: GZ 986
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) research has extended its scope from communities that are short-lived or reshape their structure annually to structurally complex forest ecosystems. The establishment of tree diversity experiments poses specific methodological challenges for assessing the multiple functions provided by forest ecosystems. In particular, methodological inconsistencies and nonstandardized protocols impede the analysis of multifunctionality within, and comparability across the increasing number of tree diversity experiments. By providing an overview on key methods currently applied in one of the largest forest biodiversity experiments, we show how methods differing in scale and simplicity can be combined to retrieve consistent data allowing novel insights into forest ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, we discuss and develop recommendations for the integration and transferability of diverse methodical approaches to present and future forest biodiversity experiments. We identified four principles that should guide basic decisions concerning method selection for tree diversity experiments and forest BEF research: (1) method selection should be directed toward maximizing data density to increase the number of measured variables in each plot. (2) Methods should cover all relevant scales of the experiment to consider scale dependencies of biodiversity effects. (3) The same variable should be evaluated with the same method across space and time for adequate larger-scale and longer-time data analysis and to reduce errors due to changing measurement protocols. (4) Standardized, practical and rapid methods for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem functions should be promoted to increase comparability among forest BEF experiments. We demonstrate that currently available methods provide us with a sophisticated toolbox to improve a synergistic understanding of forest multifunctionality. However, these methods require further adjustment to the specific requirements of structurally complex and long-lived forest ecosystems. By applying methods connecting relevant scales, trophic levels, and above- and belowground ecosystem compartments, knowledge gain from large tree diversity experiments can be optimized.
AB - Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) research has extended its scope from communities that are short-lived or reshape their structure annually to structurally complex forest ecosystems. The establishment of tree diversity experiments poses specific methodological challenges for assessing the multiple functions provided by forest ecosystems. In particular, methodological inconsistencies and nonstandardized protocols impede the analysis of multifunctionality within, and comparability across the increasing number of tree diversity experiments. By providing an overview on key methods currently applied in one of the largest forest biodiversity experiments, we show how methods differing in scale and simplicity can be combined to retrieve consistent data allowing novel insights into forest ecosystem functioning. Furthermore, we discuss and develop recommendations for the integration and transferability of diverse methodical approaches to present and future forest biodiversity experiments. We identified four principles that should guide basic decisions concerning method selection for tree diversity experiments and forest BEF research: (1) method selection should be directed toward maximizing data density to increase the number of measured variables in each plot. (2) Methods should cover all relevant scales of the experiment to consider scale dependencies of biodiversity effects. (3) The same variable should be evaluated with the same method across space and time for adequate larger-scale and longer-time data analysis and to reduce errors due to changing measurement protocols. (4) Standardized, practical and rapid methods for assessing biodiversity and ecosystem functions should be promoted to increase comparability among forest BEF experiments. We demonstrate that currently available methods provide us with a sophisticated toolbox to improve a synergistic understanding of forest multifunctionality. However, these methods require further adjustment to the specific requirements of structurally complex and long-lived forest ecosystems. By applying methods connecting relevant scales, trophic levels, and above- and belowground ecosystem compartments, knowledge gain from large tree diversity experiments can be optimized.
KW - BEF-China
KW - forest biodiversity experiments
KW - high-throughput methods
KW - multitrophic interactions
KW - standardized protocols
U2 - 10.1002/ece3.3488
DO - 10.1002/ece3.3488
M3 - Article
VL - 7
SP - 10652
EP - 10674
JO - Ecology and Evolution
JF - Ecology and Evolution
SN - 2045-7758
IS - 24
ER -