Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – A research agenda

Jonathan P. Ritson*, Danielle M. Alderson, Clare H. Robinson, Alexandra E. Burkitt, Andreas Heinemeyer, Andrew G. Stimson, Angela Gallego-Sala, Angela Harris, Anne Quillet, Ashish A. Malik, Beth Cole, Bjorn J.M. Robroek, Catherine M. Heppell, Damian W. Rivett, Dave M. Chandler, David R. Elliott, Emma L. Shuttleworth, Erik Lilleskov, Filipa Cox, Gareth D. ClayIain Diack, James Rowson, Jennifer Pratscher, Jonathan R. Lloyd, Jonathan S. Walker, Lisa R. Belyea, Marc G. Dumont, Mike Longden, Nicholle G.A. Bell, Rebekka R.E. Artz, Richard D. Bardgett, Robert I. Griffiths, Roxane Andersen, Sarah E. Chadburn, Simon M. Hutchinson, Susan E. Page, Tim Thom, William Burn, Martin G. Evans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peatlands are wetland ecosystems with great significance as natural habitats and as major global carbon stores. They have been subject to widespread exploitation and degradation with resulting losses in characteristic biota and ecosystem functions such as climate regulation. More recently, large-scale programmes have been established to restore peatland ecosystems and the various services they provide to society. Despite significant progress in peatland science and restoration practice, we lack a process-based understanding of how soil microbiota influence peatland functioning and mediate the resilience and recovery of ecosystem services, to perturbations associated with land use and climate change. We argue that there is a need to: in the short-term, characterise peatland microbial communities across a range of spatial and temporal scales and develop an improved understanding of the links between peatland habitat, ecological functions and microbial processes; in the medium term, define what a successfully restored ‘target’ peatland microbiome looks like for key carbon cycle related ecosystem services and develop microbial-based monitoring tools for assessing restoration needs; and in the longer term, to use this knowledge to influence restoration practices and assess progress on the trajectory towards ‘intact’ peatland status. Rapid advances in genetic characterisation of the structure and functions of microbial communities offer the potential for transformative progress in these areas, but the scale and speed of methodological and conceptual advances in studying ecosystem functions is a challenge for peatland scientists. Advances in this area require multidisciplinary collaborations between peatland scientists, data scientists and microbiologists and ultimately, collaboration with the modelling community. Developing a process-based understanding of the resilience and recovery of peatlands to perturbations, such as climate extremes, fires, and drainage, will be key to meeting climate targets and delivering ecosystem services cost effectively.

Original languageEnglish
Article number143467
Number of pages9
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume759
Early online date10 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge funding through the UK Natural Environment Research Council as part of the UK Climate Resilience Programme (grant number NE/5016724/1 ). The authors would also like to thank all the attendees of the workshops for their valuable contributions.

Keywords

  • Carbon cycling
  • Microbiology
  • Peat
  • Peatland restoration and management
  • Resilience
  • PLANT
  • CARBON
  • NORTHERN PEATLANDS
  • RESTORATION
  • HYPERSPECTRAL DATA
  • COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
  • METHANE
  • DYNAMICS
  • DIVERSITY
  • BOG

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards a microbial process-based understanding of the resilience of peatland ecosystem service provisioning – A research agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this