Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children

the quality care opportunity

Wendy J Graham, Affette McCaw-Binns, Stephen Munjanja

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

32 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The proportion of women and children receiving health care in the poorest countries is increasing [1]. Unfortunately, markers of improved health outcomes, such as falling maternal or newborn mortality, have not matched expectations from the gains in the coverage of care. Robust evidence exists for one explanatory factor: the poor–rich gaps in coverage found along the continuum of care for women and children, and particularly for the crucial period around childbirth [2]. The more-neglected explanation for the mismatch between coverage and health outcomes is the quality of the care provided to women and children, which is the focus of Year 1 of the Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF)-PLOS Collection on Maternal Health (http://www.ploscollections.org/maternalh​ealth_year1) and our short commentary.

Although inadequacies in care have long been noted across the world and for many health problems [3], a focus on the magnitude, costs, and consequences specifically for women and children in low-income countries is relatively new, and still has not achieved the status of a political priority [4]. This contrasts markedly with the attention paid to the coverage of care. Here we seek to highlight the synergies between inequalities in coverage and quality. The inverse care law [5] proposes that quality of care varies inversely with need, and we extend this to emphasize that poor quality care is disproportionately borne by the poorest groups of women and children. Our commentary is structured around a key cause and a consequence of the neglect of quality—weak measurement and poor evidence for action—and concludes with priorities for seizing the quality care opportunity.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1001368
Number of pages3
JournalPLoS Medicine
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Quality of Health Care
Child Care
Health
Accidental Falls
Continuity of Patient Care
Advisory Committees
Mothers
Parturition
Newborn Infant
Delivery of Health Care
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality
Maternal Health

Cite this

Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children : the quality care opportunity. / Graham, Wendy J; McCaw-Binns, Affette; Munjanja, Stephen .

In: PLoS Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 1, e1001368, 15.01.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Graham, Wendy J ; McCaw-Binns, Affette ; Munjanja, Stephen . / Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children : the quality care opportunity. In: PLoS Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 1.
@article{dea464385a564d81b9883a0d0f800c3b,
title = "Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children: the quality care opportunity",
abstract = "The proportion of women and children receiving health care in the poorest countries is increasing [1]. Unfortunately, markers of improved health outcomes, such as falling maternal or newborn mortality, have not matched expectations from the gains in the coverage of care. Robust evidence exists for one explanatory factor: the poor–rich gaps in coverage found along the continuum of care for women and children, and particularly for the crucial period around childbirth [2]. The more-neglected explanation for the mismatch between coverage and health outcomes is the quality of the care provided to women and children, which is the focus of Year 1 of the Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF)-PLOS Collection on Maternal Health (http://www.ploscollections.org/maternalh​ealth_year1) and our short commentary.Although inadequacies in care have long been noted across the world and for many health problems [3], a focus on the magnitude, costs, and consequences specifically for women and children in low-income countries is relatively new, and still has not achieved the status of a political priority [4]. This contrasts markedly with the attention paid to the coverage of care. Here we seek to highlight the synergies between inequalities in coverage and quality. The inverse care law [5] proposes that quality of care varies inversely with need, and we extend this to emphasize that poor quality care is disproportionately borne by the poorest groups of women and children. Our commentary is structured around a key cause and a consequence of the neglect of quality—weak measurement and poor evidence for action—and concludes with priorities for seizing the quality care opportunity.",
author = "Graham, {Wendy J} and Affette McCaw-Binns and Stephen Munjanja",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pmed.1001368",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "PLoS Medicine",
issn = "1549-1277",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Translating coverage gains into health gains for all women and children

T2 - the quality care opportunity

AU - Graham, Wendy J

AU - McCaw-Binns, Affette

AU - Munjanja, Stephen

PY - 2013/1/15

Y1 - 2013/1/15

N2 - The proportion of women and children receiving health care in the poorest countries is increasing [1]. Unfortunately, markers of improved health outcomes, such as falling maternal or newborn mortality, have not matched expectations from the gains in the coverage of care. Robust evidence exists for one explanatory factor: the poor–rich gaps in coverage found along the continuum of care for women and children, and particularly for the crucial period around childbirth [2]. The more-neglected explanation for the mismatch between coverage and health outcomes is the quality of the care provided to women and children, which is the focus of Year 1 of the Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF)-PLOS Collection on Maternal Health (http://www.ploscollections.org/maternalh​ealth_year1) and our short commentary.Although inadequacies in care have long been noted across the world and for many health problems [3], a focus on the magnitude, costs, and consequences specifically for women and children in low-income countries is relatively new, and still has not achieved the status of a political priority [4]. This contrasts markedly with the attention paid to the coverage of care. Here we seek to highlight the synergies between inequalities in coverage and quality. The inverse care law [5] proposes that quality of care varies inversely with need, and we extend this to emphasize that poor quality care is disproportionately borne by the poorest groups of women and children. Our commentary is structured around a key cause and a consequence of the neglect of quality—weak measurement and poor evidence for action—and concludes with priorities for seizing the quality care opportunity.

AB - The proportion of women and children receiving health care in the poorest countries is increasing [1]. Unfortunately, markers of improved health outcomes, such as falling maternal or newborn mortality, have not matched expectations from the gains in the coverage of care. Robust evidence exists for one explanatory factor: the poor–rich gaps in coverage found along the continuum of care for women and children, and particularly for the crucial period around childbirth [2]. The more-neglected explanation for the mismatch between coverage and health outcomes is the quality of the care provided to women and children, which is the focus of Year 1 of the Maternal Health Task Force (MHTF)-PLOS Collection on Maternal Health (http://www.ploscollections.org/maternalh​ealth_year1) and our short commentary.Although inadequacies in care have long been noted across the world and for many health problems [3], a focus on the magnitude, costs, and consequences specifically for women and children in low-income countries is relatively new, and still has not achieved the status of a political priority [4]. This contrasts markedly with the attention paid to the coverage of care. Here we seek to highlight the synergies between inequalities in coverage and quality. The inverse care law [5] proposes that quality of care varies inversely with need, and we extend this to emphasize that poor quality care is disproportionately borne by the poorest groups of women and children. Our commentary is structured around a key cause and a consequence of the neglect of quality—weak measurement and poor evidence for action—and concludes with priorities for seizing the quality care opportunity.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001368

DO - 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001368

M3 - Editorial

VL - 10

JO - PLoS Medicine

JF - PLoS Medicine

SN - 1549-1277

IS - 1

M1 - e1001368

ER -