Transport carbon costs do not negate the benefits of agricultural carbon mitigation options

Pete Smith, T J F Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been suggested that some agricultural carbon (C) mitigation options will yield no net C benefit under full carbon accounting (i.e. when costs are included alongside benefits). The largest likely C cost of implementing many options is the fuel cost associated with transporting resources from the place where they are produced to the place where they are used. In this article, we show that fuel C costs of transporting resources are much lower than the C benefits of agricultural mitigation options. These findings suggest that the agricultural C mitigation options examined here will yield a net C benefit, even under full carbon accounting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-381
Number of pages3
JournalEcology Letters
Volume3
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2000

Keywords

  • carbon mitigation
  • carbon sequestration
  • Europe
  • full carbon accounting
  • transport carbon costs
  • European soils
  • sequestration

Cite this

Transport carbon costs do not negate the benefits of agricultural carbon mitigation options. / Smith, Pete; Smith, T J F .

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 3, No. 5, 09.2000, p. 379-381.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ccdc63910aec415d85f031928ad2f0d9,
title = "Transport carbon costs do not negate the benefits of agricultural carbon mitigation options",
abstract = "It has been suggested that some agricultural carbon (C) mitigation options will yield no net C benefit under full carbon accounting (i.e. when costs are included alongside benefits). The largest likely C cost of implementing many options is the fuel cost associated with transporting resources from the place where they are produced to the place where they are used. In this article, we show that fuel C costs of transporting resources are much lower than the C benefits of agricultural mitigation options. These findings suggest that the agricultural C mitigation options examined here will yield a net C benefit, even under full carbon accounting.",
keywords = "carbon mitigation, carbon sequestration, Europe, full carbon accounting, transport carbon costs, European soils, sequestration",
author = "Pete Smith and Smith, {T J F}",
year = "2000",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00176.x",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "379--381",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transport carbon costs do not negate the benefits of agricultural carbon mitigation options

AU - Smith, Pete

AU - Smith, T J F

PY - 2000/9

Y1 - 2000/9

N2 - It has been suggested that some agricultural carbon (C) mitigation options will yield no net C benefit under full carbon accounting (i.e. when costs are included alongside benefits). The largest likely C cost of implementing many options is the fuel cost associated with transporting resources from the place where they are produced to the place where they are used. In this article, we show that fuel C costs of transporting resources are much lower than the C benefits of agricultural mitigation options. These findings suggest that the agricultural C mitigation options examined here will yield a net C benefit, even under full carbon accounting.

AB - It has been suggested that some agricultural carbon (C) mitigation options will yield no net C benefit under full carbon accounting (i.e. when costs are included alongside benefits). The largest likely C cost of implementing many options is the fuel cost associated with transporting resources from the place where they are produced to the place where they are used. In this article, we show that fuel C costs of transporting resources are much lower than the C benefits of agricultural mitigation options. These findings suggest that the agricultural C mitigation options examined here will yield a net C benefit, even under full carbon accounting.

KW - carbon mitigation

KW - carbon sequestration

KW - Europe

KW - full carbon accounting

KW - transport carbon costs

KW - European soils

KW - sequestration

U2 - 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00176.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00176.x

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 379

EP - 381

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 5

ER -