Transport carbon costs do not negate the benefits of agricultural carbon mitigation options

Pete Smith, T J F Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


It has been suggested that some agricultural carbon (C) mitigation options will yield no net C benefit under full carbon accounting (i.e. when costs are included alongside benefits). The largest likely C cost of implementing many options is the fuel cost associated with transporting resources from the place where they are produced to the place where they are used. In this article, we show that fuel C costs of transporting resources are much lower than the C benefits of agricultural mitigation options. These findings suggest that the agricultural C mitigation options examined here will yield a net C benefit, even under full carbon accounting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-381
Number of pages3
JournalEcology Letters
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2000


  • carbon mitigation
  • carbon sequestration
  • Europe
  • full carbon accounting
  • transport carbon costs
  • European soils
  • sequestration

Cite this