Treatment for Complicated Grief: State of the Science and Ways Forward

Bettina K. Doering, Maarten C. Eisma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose of review: There is increasing recognition that a minority of bereaved persons experiences persistent and disabling grief symptoms, also termed complicated grief (CG). We review currently proposed criteria for CG in DSM 5 and ICD-11, highlight controversies with regard to establishing CG as a psychiatric disorder, summarize recent CG treatment research within a cognitive behavioral treatment framework, and establish a novel, systematic research agenda for CG treatment.
Recent findings: Clinicians should be wary of overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of CG. Recent changes to definitions of CG may threaten generalizability and clinical application of research findings. Universal treatment, treatment for at-risk groups, and preventive CG treatment appear ineffective. Although medication is often prescribed to bereaved persons, evidence for its effectiveness is equivocal. Face-to-face and internet-based CBT techniques appear most effective in targeting CG. However, little is known about what, how, and for whom treatment works best.
Summary: In light of these findings, we recommend systematic investigation of: what works best in CG treatment, by conducting well-designed, stepped effectiveness trials and treatment component dismantling studies; how it works, by conducting investigations on therapeutic theories and examining mediators of therapeutic change; and for whom it works, by examining potential moderators of treatment effects.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)286-291
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Psychiatry
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Grief
Research
Diagnostic Errors
Internet
Psychiatry

Keywords

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Complicated Grief
  • Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder
  • Prolonged Bereavement Disorder
  • Psychotherapy

Cite this

Treatment for Complicated Grief : State of the Science and Ways Forward. / Doering, Bettina K.; Eisma, Maarten C.

In: Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.09.2016, p. 286-291.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Doering, Bettina K. ; Eisma, Maarten C. / Treatment for Complicated Grief : State of the Science and Ways Forward. In: Current Opinion in Psychiatry. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 286-291.
@article{43d4a5e539424e4fa54adbd8fcfd04c7,
title = "Treatment for Complicated Grief: State of the Science and Ways Forward",
abstract = "Purpose of review: There is increasing recognition that a minority of bereaved persons experiences persistent and disabling grief symptoms, also termed complicated grief (CG). We review currently proposed criteria for CG in DSM 5 and ICD-11, highlight controversies with regard to establishing CG as a psychiatric disorder, summarize recent CG treatment research within a cognitive behavioral treatment framework, and establish a novel, systematic research agenda for CG treatment.Recent findings: Clinicians should be wary of overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of CG. Recent changes to definitions of CG may threaten generalizability and clinical application of research findings. Universal treatment, treatment for at-risk groups, and preventive CG treatment appear ineffective. Although medication is often prescribed to bereaved persons, evidence for its effectiveness is equivocal. Face-to-face and internet-based CBT techniques appear most effective in targeting CG. However, little is known about what, how, and for whom treatment works best.Summary: In light of these findings, we recommend systematic investigation of: what works best in CG treatment, by conducting well-designed, stepped effectiveness trials and treatment component dismantling studies; how it works, by conducting investigations on therapeutic theories and examining mediators of therapeutic change; and for whom it works, by examining potential moderators of treatment effects.",
keywords = "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Complicated Grief, Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder, Prolonged Bereavement Disorder, Psychotherapy",
author = "Doering, {Bettina K.} and Eisma, {Maarten C.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/YCO.0000000000000263",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "286--291",
journal = "Current Opinion in Psychiatry",
issn = "0951-6578",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Treatment for Complicated Grief

T2 - State of the Science and Ways Forward

AU - Doering, Bettina K.

AU - Eisma, Maarten C.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Purpose of review: There is increasing recognition that a minority of bereaved persons experiences persistent and disabling grief symptoms, also termed complicated grief (CG). We review currently proposed criteria for CG in DSM 5 and ICD-11, highlight controversies with regard to establishing CG as a psychiatric disorder, summarize recent CG treatment research within a cognitive behavioral treatment framework, and establish a novel, systematic research agenda for CG treatment.Recent findings: Clinicians should be wary of overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of CG. Recent changes to definitions of CG may threaten generalizability and clinical application of research findings. Universal treatment, treatment for at-risk groups, and preventive CG treatment appear ineffective. Although medication is often prescribed to bereaved persons, evidence for its effectiveness is equivocal. Face-to-face and internet-based CBT techniques appear most effective in targeting CG. However, little is known about what, how, and for whom treatment works best.Summary: In light of these findings, we recommend systematic investigation of: what works best in CG treatment, by conducting well-designed, stepped effectiveness trials and treatment component dismantling studies; how it works, by conducting investigations on therapeutic theories and examining mediators of therapeutic change; and for whom it works, by examining potential moderators of treatment effects.

AB - Purpose of review: There is increasing recognition that a minority of bereaved persons experiences persistent and disabling grief symptoms, also termed complicated grief (CG). We review currently proposed criteria for CG in DSM 5 and ICD-11, highlight controversies with regard to establishing CG as a psychiatric disorder, summarize recent CG treatment research within a cognitive behavioral treatment framework, and establish a novel, systematic research agenda for CG treatment.Recent findings: Clinicians should be wary of overdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of CG. Recent changes to definitions of CG may threaten generalizability and clinical application of research findings. Universal treatment, treatment for at-risk groups, and preventive CG treatment appear ineffective. Although medication is often prescribed to bereaved persons, evidence for its effectiveness is equivocal. Face-to-face and internet-based CBT techniques appear most effective in targeting CG. However, little is known about what, how, and for whom treatment works best.Summary: In light of these findings, we recommend systematic investigation of: what works best in CG treatment, by conducting well-designed, stepped effectiveness trials and treatment component dismantling studies; how it works, by conducting investigations on therapeutic theories and examining mediators of therapeutic change; and for whom it works, by examining potential moderators of treatment effects.

KW - Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

KW - Complicated Grief

KW - Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder

KW - Prolonged Bereavement Disorder

KW - Psychotherapy

U2 - 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000263

DO - 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000263

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 286

EP - 291

JO - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

JF - Current Opinion in Psychiatry

SN - 0951-6578

IS - 5

ER -