Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity: Developing models for assessment

Roslyn C. Henry (Corresponding Author), Stephen C.F. Palmer, Kevin Watts, Ruth J. Mitchell, Nick Atkinson, Justin M.J. Travis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Trees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to address the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for < 2% of land cover, but removing 60% of them (~ 1.2% of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17%. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)90-99
Number of pages10
JournalEcological Informatics
Volume42
Early online date19 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

Roadsides
connectivity
Connectivity
woodlands
woodland
Model
Land Cover
Innovation
land cover
loss
breeding
Demonstrate
Proportion
innovation

Keywords

  • Connectivity
  • Tree disease
  • Tree mortality
  • Modelling
  • RangeShifter
  • Scattered trees
  • Corridors

Cite this

Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity : Developing models for assessment. / Henry, Roslyn C. (Corresponding Author); Palmer, Stephen C.F.; Watts, Kevin; Mitchell, Ruth J.; Atkinson, Nick; Travis, Justin M.J.

In: Ecological Informatics, Vol. 42, 11.2017, p. 90-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, Roslyn C. ; Palmer, Stephen C.F. ; Watts, Kevin ; Mitchell, Ruth J. ; Atkinson, Nick ; Travis, Justin M.J. / Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity : Developing models for assessment. In: Ecological Informatics. 2017 ; Vol. 42. pp. 90-99.
@article{6a7964cc5b5c46dea70c90b1ef41473a,
title = "Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity: Developing models for assessment",
abstract = "Trees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to address the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for < 2{\%} of land cover, but removing 60{\%} of them (~ 1.2{\%} of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17{\%}. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.",
keywords = "Connectivity, Tree disease, Tree mortality, Modelling, RangeShifter, Scattered trees, Corridors",
author = "Henry, {Roslyn C.} and Palmer, {Stephen C.F.} and Kevin Watts and Mitchell, {Ruth J.} and Nick Atkinson and Travis, {Justin M.J.}",
note = "JMJT, RCH and SCFP were funded by NERC (NE/J008001/1). RJM was funded by the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) research program. This project also benefited from funding provided by the Woodland Trust (A13246). KW was supported with funding from the Forestry Commission.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "90--99",
journal = "Ecological Informatics",
issn = "1574-9541",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tree loss impacts on ecological connectivity

T2 - Developing models for assessment

AU - Henry, Roslyn C.

AU - Palmer, Stephen C.F.

AU - Watts, Kevin

AU - Mitchell, Ruth J.

AU - Atkinson, Nick

AU - Travis, Justin M.J.

N1 - JMJT, RCH and SCFP were funded by NERC (NE/J008001/1). RJM was funded by the Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services (RESAS) research program. This project also benefited from funding provided by the Woodland Trust (A13246). KW was supported with funding from the Forestry Commission.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - Trees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to address the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for < 2% of land cover, but removing 60% of them (~ 1.2% of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17%. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.

AB - Trees along linear features are important landscape features, and their loss threatens ecological connectivity. Until recently, trees outside of woodlands (TOWs) were largely unmapped however; the development of innovation mapping techniques provides opportunities to understand the distribution of such trees and to apply spatially explicit models to address the importance of trees for connectivity. In this study, we demonstrate the utility of models when investigating tree loss and impacts on connectivity. Specifically, we investigated the consequences of tree loss due to the removal of roadside trees, a common management response for diseased or damaged trees, on wider landscape functional connectivity. We simulated the loss of roadside trees within six focal areas of the south east of the UK. We used a spatially explicit individual-based modelling platform, RangeShifter, to model the movement of 81 hypothetical actively dispersing woodland breeding species across these agriculturally fragmented landscapes. We investigated the extent to which removal of trees, from roadsides within the wider landscape, affected the total number of successful dispersers in any given year and the number of breeding woodlands that became isolated through time. On average roadside trees accounted for < 2% of land cover, but removing 60% of them (~ 1.2% of land cover) nevertheless decreased the number of successful dispersers by up to 17%. The impact was greatest when roadside trees represented a greater proportion of canopy cover. The study therefore demonstrates that models such as RangeShifter can provide valuable tools for assessing the consequences of losing trees outside of woodlands.

KW - Connectivity

KW - Tree disease

KW - Tree mortality

KW - Modelling

KW - RangeShifter

KW - Scattered trees

KW - Corridors

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.010

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.10.010

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 90

EP - 99

JO - Ecological Informatics

JF - Ecological Informatics

SN - 1574-9541

ER -