Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Alexander Shytov (Corresponding Author), Peter Duff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Chinese criminal procedural law has recently been undergoing rapid transformation. While the search for ‘truth’, embodied in a confession by the accused, has traditionally dominated the criminal process, efforts are now being made to secure more procedural fairness. This is exemplified by the introduction of rules to render inadmissible at trial confessions extorted from suspects by ill treatment. Unsurprisingly, it has proved difficult to shift the mindsets of the players in the criminal justice process. The new rules have not been fully implemented in many respects and there is still confusion over the criteria to be used by the courts in making decisions about inadmissibility. Further, it has proved difficult to enable defence lawyers to play a more active role in defending their clients and to render it normal for witnesses to testify at trial. This handicaps the drive to secure a better balance between the search for truth and procedural fairness in the Chinese criminal trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-315
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence and Proof
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date6 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

criminal procedure
fairness
Law
procedural law
Handicap
accused
criminal law
lawyer
witness
justice
decision making
trial
criminal law procedure

Keywords

  • China
  • criminal procedure
  • evidence
  • fair trial
  • admissibility
  • confessions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law. / Shytov, Alexander (Corresponding Author); Duff, Peter.

In: International Journal of Evidence and Proof, Vol. 23, No. 3, 01.07.2019, p. 299-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9663e7d9267940f6a81ceddddbef5bff,
title = "Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law",
abstract = "Chinese criminal procedural law has recently been undergoing rapid transformation. While the search for ‘truth’, embodied in a confession by the accused, has traditionally dominated the criminal process, efforts are now being made to secure more procedural fairness. This is exemplified by the introduction of rules to render inadmissible at trial confessions extorted from suspects by ill treatment. Unsurprisingly, it has proved difficult to shift the mindsets of the players in the criminal justice process. The new rules have not been fully implemented in many respects and there is still confusion over the criteria to be used by the courts in making decisions about inadmissibility. Further, it has proved difficult to enable defence lawyers to play a more active role in defending their clients and to render it normal for witnesses to testify at trial. This handicaps the drive to secure a better balance between the search for truth and procedural fairness in the Chinese criminal trial.",
keywords = "China, criminal procedure, evidence, fair trial, admissibility, confessions",
author = "Alexander Shytov and Peter Duff",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1365712719830704",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "299--315",
journal = "International Journal of Evidence and Proof",
issn = "1365-7127",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

AU - Shytov, Alexander

AU - Duff, Peter

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Chinese criminal procedural law has recently been undergoing rapid transformation. While the search for ‘truth’, embodied in a confession by the accused, has traditionally dominated the criminal process, efforts are now being made to secure more procedural fairness. This is exemplified by the introduction of rules to render inadmissible at trial confessions extorted from suspects by ill treatment. Unsurprisingly, it has proved difficult to shift the mindsets of the players in the criminal justice process. The new rules have not been fully implemented in many respects and there is still confusion over the criteria to be used by the courts in making decisions about inadmissibility. Further, it has proved difficult to enable defence lawyers to play a more active role in defending their clients and to render it normal for witnesses to testify at trial. This handicaps the drive to secure a better balance between the search for truth and procedural fairness in the Chinese criminal trial.

AB - Chinese criminal procedural law has recently been undergoing rapid transformation. While the search for ‘truth’, embodied in a confession by the accused, has traditionally dominated the criminal process, efforts are now being made to secure more procedural fairness. This is exemplified by the introduction of rules to render inadmissible at trial confessions extorted from suspects by ill treatment. Unsurprisingly, it has proved difficult to shift the mindsets of the players in the criminal justice process. The new rules have not been fully implemented in many respects and there is still confusion over the criteria to be used by the courts in making decisions about inadmissibility. Further, it has proved difficult to enable defence lawyers to play a more active role in defending their clients and to render it normal for witnesses to testify at trial. This handicaps the drive to secure a better balance between the search for truth and procedural fairness in the Chinese criminal trial.

KW - China

KW - criminal procedure

KW - evidence

KW - fair trial

KW - admissibility

KW - confessions

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/truth-procedural-fairness-chinese-criminal-procedure-law

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062666764&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1365712719830704

DO - 10.1177/1365712719830704

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 299

EP - 315

JO - International Journal of Evidence and Proof

JF - International Journal of Evidence and Proof

SN - 1365-7127

IS - 3

ER -