Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law

Alexander Shytov (Corresponding Author), Peter Duff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Chinese criminal procedural law has recently been undergoing rapid transformation. While the search for ‘truth’, embodied in a confession by the accused, has traditionally dominated the criminal process, efforts are now being made to secure more procedural fairness. This is exemplified by the introduction of rules to render inadmissible at trial confessions extorted from suspects by ill treatment. Unsurprisingly, it has proved difficult to shift the mindsets of the players in the criminal justice process. The new rules have not been fully implemented in many respects and there is still confusion over the criteria to be used by the courts in making decisions about inadmissibility. Further, it has proved difficult to enable defence lawyers to play a more active role in defending their clients and to render it normal for witnesses to testify at trial. This handicaps the drive to secure a better balance between the search for truth and procedural fairness in the Chinese criminal trial.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-315
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Journal of Evidence and Proof
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date6 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Keywords

  • China
  • criminal procedure
  • evidence
  • fair trial
  • admissibility
  • confessions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Truth and procedural fairness in Chinese criminal procedure law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Peter Duff

    Peter Duff

    Person: Academic

    Cite this