Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis

William Douglas Thompson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    11 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The concept that malignant solid tumour growth depends on angiogenesis is widely recognized. For some tumour types, there is a measurable range of vascularity and the link between prognosis and increased vascular density, best observed at the hotspots at the edge, is now established. What is less discussed are the corollaries: that tumour invasion requires tissue destruction; that the neovasculature must be not only protected but also sustained, especially at the tumour edge; that for tumour survival the edge is the future and the centre is history; and that angiogenesis is essential not only for tumour growth but also for tumour invasion. Different patterns of vascular density in tumour edge and centre have been observed, and these are linked to lymphatic spread and prognosis. The variation is attributable to differing interactions between endothelium and the tumour cell that dictate vascular and tumour survival; this may become relevant to antiangiogenesis therapies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)425-426
    Number of pages1
    JournalThe Journal of pathology
    Volume193
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2001

    Keywords

    • angiogenesis
    • anti-angiogenesis
    • tumour

    Cite this

    Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis. / Thompson, William Douglas.

    In: The Journal of pathology, Vol. 193, No. 4, 2001, p. 425-426.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Thompson, William Douglas. / Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis. In: The Journal of pathology. 2001 ; Vol. 193, No. 4. pp. 425-426.
    @article{276b1f54aa234314b40dc0e1d9f6e732,
    title = "Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis",
    abstract = "The concept that malignant solid tumour growth depends on angiogenesis is widely recognized. For some tumour types, there is a measurable range of vascularity and the link between prognosis and increased vascular density, best observed at the hotspots at the edge, is now established. What is less discussed are the corollaries: that tumour invasion requires tissue destruction; that the neovasculature must be not only protected but also sustained, especially at the tumour edge; that for tumour survival the edge is the future and the centre is history; and that angiogenesis is essential not only for tumour growth but also for tumour invasion. Different patterns of vascular density in tumour edge and centre have been observed, and these are linked to lymphatic spread and prognosis. The variation is attributable to differing interactions between endothelium and the tumour cell that dictate vascular and tumour survival; this may become relevant to antiangiogenesis therapies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
    keywords = "angiogenesis, anti-angiogenesis, tumour",
    author = "Thompson, {William Douglas}",
    year = "2001",
    doi = "10.1002/1096-9896(200104)193:4<425::AID-PATH830>3.0.CO;2-E",
    language = "English",
    volume = "193",
    pages = "425--426",
    journal = "The Journal of pathology",
    issn = "0022-3417",
    publisher = "Wiley",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tumour versus patient: vascular and tumour survival versus prognosis

    AU - Thompson, William Douglas

    PY - 2001

    Y1 - 2001

    N2 - The concept that malignant solid tumour growth depends on angiogenesis is widely recognized. For some tumour types, there is a measurable range of vascularity and the link between prognosis and increased vascular density, best observed at the hotspots at the edge, is now established. What is less discussed are the corollaries: that tumour invasion requires tissue destruction; that the neovasculature must be not only protected but also sustained, especially at the tumour edge; that for tumour survival the edge is the future and the centre is history; and that angiogenesis is essential not only for tumour growth but also for tumour invasion. Different patterns of vascular density in tumour edge and centre have been observed, and these are linked to lymphatic spread and prognosis. The variation is attributable to differing interactions between endothelium and the tumour cell that dictate vascular and tumour survival; this may become relevant to antiangiogenesis therapies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    AB - The concept that malignant solid tumour growth depends on angiogenesis is widely recognized. For some tumour types, there is a measurable range of vascularity and the link between prognosis and increased vascular density, best observed at the hotspots at the edge, is now established. What is less discussed are the corollaries: that tumour invasion requires tissue destruction; that the neovasculature must be not only protected but also sustained, especially at the tumour edge; that for tumour survival the edge is the future and the centre is history; and that angiogenesis is essential not only for tumour growth but also for tumour invasion. Different patterns of vascular density in tumour edge and centre have been observed, and these are linked to lymphatic spread and prognosis. The variation is attributable to differing interactions between endothelium and the tumour cell that dictate vascular and tumour survival; this may become relevant to antiangiogenesis therapies. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    KW - angiogenesis

    KW - anti-angiogenesis

    KW - tumour

    U2 - 10.1002/1096-9896(200104)193:4<425::AID-PATH830>3.0.CO;2-E

    DO - 10.1002/1096-9896(200104)193:4<425::AID-PATH830>3.0.CO;2-E

    M3 - Article

    VL - 193

    SP - 425

    EP - 426

    JO - The Journal of pathology

    JF - The Journal of pathology

    SN - 0022-3417

    IS - 4

    ER -