Turkish voters and losers' consent

Richard Rose

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper tests four hypotheses of "losers' consent"-that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People's Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from. the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner's affect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari'a rule.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)363-378
    Number of pages16
    JournalTurkish Studies
    Volume9
    Issue number2
    Early online date21 May 2008
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Keywords

    • transitions
    • democracy
    • Turkey

    Cite this

    Turkish voters and losers' consent. / Rose, Richard.

    In: Turkish Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2008, p. 363-378.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Rose, Richard. / Turkish voters and losers' consent. In: Turkish Studies. 2008 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 363-378.
    @article{39ee36142b2046d5956a730b55e114c9,
    title = "Turkish voters and losers' consent",
    abstract = "This paper tests four hypotheses of {"}losers' consent{"}-that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People's Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from. the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner's affect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari'a rule.",
    keywords = "transitions, democracy, Turkey",
    author = "Richard Rose",
    year = "2008",
    doi = "10.1080/14683840802012116",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "363--378",
    journal = "Turkish Studies",
    issn = "1468-3849",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Turkish voters and losers' consent

    AU - Rose, Richard

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - This paper tests four hypotheses of "losers' consent"-that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People's Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from. the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner's affect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari'a rule.

    AB - This paper tests four hypotheses of "losers' consent"-that is, the extent to which evaluations of democratic governance are shared by citizens who voted for the Justice and Development Party (AKP), the winner at the 2007 Turkish elections, and those who voted for the opposition parties, the Republican People's Party (CHP) and the Nationalist Action Party (MHP). It uses survey data about governance evaluations from. the 2007 Turkish Election Study. The evidence rejects the idea that losers withhold consent, creating polarized pluralism. It gives some support to a winner's affect. It finds a substantial degree of similarity in views of governance across party lines. Differences between voters for the two losing parties are sometimes greater than differences with the AKP. Regardless of dissatisfaction with some features of governance, there is an overwhelming consensus rejecting a change of regime to military or Shari'a rule.

    KW - transitions

    KW - democracy

    KW - Turkey

    U2 - 10.1080/14683840802012116

    DO - 10.1080/14683840802012116

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 363

    EP - 378

    JO - Turkish Studies

    JF - Turkish Studies

    SN - 1468-3849

    IS - 2

    ER -