Turn up, tune in, don’t drop out: the relationship between lecture attendance, use of lecture recordings, and achievement at different levels of study

Emily Nordmann (Corresponding Author), Colin Calder, Paul Bishop, Amy Irwin, Darren Comber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Lecture capture tends to polarise the views of academic staff. Some view it as encouraging non-attendance at lectures. Others view it as a valuable adjunct, allowing students to revisit the lecture experience and providing opportunities for clarification and repetition of key points. However, data supporting either of these stances remains scarce. Irrespective of these views, a more pertinent question pertains to the impact of lecture attendance and the use of recordings on student achievement. Findings remain unclear due to methodological issues, inconsistent findings, and a lack of differentiation of students by year of study. This paper investigated the impact of attendance, lecture recording, and student attainment across four years of an undergraduate programme. For first year students, attendance and recording use were positive predictors of performance. For weaker students, supplementary recording use was beneficial but only better students use of the recordings helped overcome the impact of low attendance. For second year students, attendance and recording use were positively correlated with, but no longer predictive of, achievement. There was no relationship for honours year students. We found no compelling evidence for a negative effect of recording use, or that attendance and recording use were related. We suggest focusing on improving lecture attendance through monitoring whilst also providing recordings for supplementary use, particularly in first year. Finally, our findings highlight the need to consider third variables such as year of study and first language when conducting and comparing lecture capture research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1065-1084
Number of pages20
JournalHigher Education
Volume77
Issue number6
Early online date3 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint

drop-out
recording
student
first-year student
honor
monitoring
staff
lack
language

Keywords

  • Lecture attendance
  • Lecture capture
  • Lecture recording

Cite this

Turn up, tune in, don’t drop out : the relationship between lecture attendance, use of lecture recordings, and achievement at different levels of study. / Nordmann, Emily (Corresponding Author); Calder, Colin; Bishop, Paul; Irwin, Amy; Comber, Darren.

In: Higher Education, Vol. 77, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1065-1084.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f3f6bb8f8f3c4deb9ffc37ed85e58536,
title = "Turn up, tune in, don’t drop out: the relationship between lecture attendance, use of lecture recordings, and achievement at different levels of study",
abstract = "Lecture capture tends to polarise the views of academic staff. Some view it as encouraging non-attendance at lectures. Others view it as a valuable adjunct, allowing students to revisit the lecture experience and providing opportunities for clarification and repetition of key points. However, data supporting either of these stances remains scarce. Irrespective of these views, a more pertinent question pertains to the impact of lecture attendance and the use of recordings on student achievement. Findings remain unclear due to methodological issues, inconsistent findings, and a lack of differentiation of students by year of study. This paper investigated the impact of attendance, lecture recording, and student attainment across four years of an undergraduate programme. For first year students, attendance and recording use were positive predictors of performance. For weaker students, supplementary recording use was beneficial but only better students use of the recordings helped overcome the impact of low attendance. For second year students, attendance and recording use were positively correlated with, but no longer predictive of, achievement. There was no relationship for honours year students. We found no compelling evidence for a negative effect of recording use, or that attendance and recording use were related. We suggest focusing on improving lecture attendance through monitoring whilst also providing recordings for supplementary use, particularly in first year. Finally, our findings highlight the need to consider third variables such as year of study and first language when conducting and comparing lecture capture research.",
keywords = "Lecture attendance, Lecture capture, Lecture recording",
author = "Emily Nordmann and Colin Calder and Paul Bishop and Amy Irwin and Darren Comber",
note = "Open Access via Springer Compact",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-018-0320-8",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "1065--1084",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turn up, tune in, don’t drop out

T2 - the relationship between lecture attendance, use of lecture recordings, and achievement at different levels of study

AU - Nordmann, Emily

AU - Calder, Colin

AU - Bishop, Paul

AU - Irwin, Amy

AU - Comber, Darren

N1 - Open Access via Springer Compact

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - Lecture capture tends to polarise the views of academic staff. Some view it as encouraging non-attendance at lectures. Others view it as a valuable adjunct, allowing students to revisit the lecture experience and providing opportunities for clarification and repetition of key points. However, data supporting either of these stances remains scarce. Irrespective of these views, a more pertinent question pertains to the impact of lecture attendance and the use of recordings on student achievement. Findings remain unclear due to methodological issues, inconsistent findings, and a lack of differentiation of students by year of study. This paper investigated the impact of attendance, lecture recording, and student attainment across four years of an undergraduate programme. For first year students, attendance and recording use were positive predictors of performance. For weaker students, supplementary recording use was beneficial but only better students use of the recordings helped overcome the impact of low attendance. For second year students, attendance and recording use were positively correlated with, but no longer predictive of, achievement. There was no relationship for honours year students. We found no compelling evidence for a negative effect of recording use, or that attendance and recording use were related. We suggest focusing on improving lecture attendance through monitoring whilst also providing recordings for supplementary use, particularly in first year. Finally, our findings highlight the need to consider third variables such as year of study and first language when conducting and comparing lecture capture research.

AB - Lecture capture tends to polarise the views of academic staff. Some view it as encouraging non-attendance at lectures. Others view it as a valuable adjunct, allowing students to revisit the lecture experience and providing opportunities for clarification and repetition of key points. However, data supporting either of these stances remains scarce. Irrespective of these views, a more pertinent question pertains to the impact of lecture attendance and the use of recordings on student achievement. Findings remain unclear due to methodological issues, inconsistent findings, and a lack of differentiation of students by year of study. This paper investigated the impact of attendance, lecture recording, and student attainment across four years of an undergraduate programme. For first year students, attendance and recording use were positive predictors of performance. For weaker students, supplementary recording use was beneficial but only better students use of the recordings helped overcome the impact of low attendance. For second year students, attendance and recording use were positively correlated with, but no longer predictive of, achievement. There was no relationship for honours year students. We found no compelling evidence for a negative effect of recording use, or that attendance and recording use were related. We suggest focusing on improving lecture attendance through monitoring whilst also providing recordings for supplementary use, particularly in first year. Finally, our findings highlight the need to consider third variables such as year of study and first language when conducting and comparing lecture capture research.

KW - Lecture attendance

KW - Lecture capture

KW - Lecture recording

UR - http://hdl.handle.net/2164/11433

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/turn-up-tune-dont-drop-relationship-between-lecture-attendance-lecture-recordings-achievement-differ

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-018-0320-8

DO - 10.1007/s10734-018-0320-8

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 1065

EP - 1084

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 6

ER -