Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility

Cindy Farquhar, Vivienne Moore, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Debbie Blake, Andy Vail, Jane Thomas, Ying Cheong, Marian Showell, Helen Nagels, Jane Marjoribanks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The past three decades have seen considerable change in the understanding of clinical research methods. There has been an acceptance that RCTs are the best way of establishing treatment effectiveness and a recognition that, while single studies are useful, pooling knowledge from a complete body of work is likely to provide the best evidence. Advances in methodology have been mirrored by the many advances in the field of reproductive medicine, such as assisted reproduction, assessment of male fertility, ovulation induction and laparoscopic surgery. Together, they have led to welcome improvements in the outcomes of fertility treatments. In particular, systematic reviews have become important tools enabling clinicians and patients to make health-care decisions based on evidence from all the available high-quality studies. The move towards identifying and aggregating the highest quality evidence has been led by the Cochrane Collaboration, which this year celebrates 20 years of preparing and publishing systematic reviews. This paper outlines the achievements, progress and challenges of this enterprise to date, with a particular focus on systematic reviews of reproductive medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2883-2892
Number of pages10
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume28
Issue number11
Early online date29 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Reproductive Medicine
Infertility
Fertility
Ovulation Induction
Laparoscopy
Reproduction
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Cochrane reviews
  • menstrual disorders
  • subfertility
  • assisted reproduction
  • systematic reviews

Cite this

Farquhar, C., Moore, V., Bhattacharya, S., Blake, D., Vail, A., Thomas, J., ... Marjoribanks, J. (2013). Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility. Human Reproduction, 28(11), 2883-2892. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det334

Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility. / Farquhar, Cindy; Moore, Vivienne; Bhattacharya, Siladitya; Blake, Debbie; Vail, Andy; Thomas, Jane; Cheong, Ying; Showell, Marian; Nagels, Helen; Marjoribanks, Jane.

In: Human Reproduction, Vol. 28, No. 11, 2013, p. 2883-2892.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farquhar, C, Moore, V, Bhattacharya, S, Blake, D, Vail, A, Thomas, J, Cheong, Y, Showell, M, Nagels, H & Marjoribanks, J 2013, 'Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility', Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 2883-2892. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det334
Farquhar, Cindy ; Moore, Vivienne ; Bhattacharya, Siladitya ; Blake, Debbie ; Vail, Andy ; Thomas, Jane ; Cheong, Ying ; Showell, Marian ; Nagels, Helen ; Marjoribanks, Jane. / Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility. In: Human Reproduction. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 2883-2892.
@article{11e8d032a1014495bd6505e24daaa7e9,
title = "Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility",
abstract = "The past three decades have seen considerable change in the understanding of clinical research methods. There has been an acceptance that RCTs are the best way of establishing treatment effectiveness and a recognition that, while single studies are useful, pooling knowledge from a complete body of work is likely to provide the best evidence. Advances in methodology have been mirrored by the many advances in the field of reproductive medicine, such as assisted reproduction, assessment of male fertility, ovulation induction and laparoscopic surgery. Together, they have led to welcome improvements in the outcomes of fertility treatments. In particular, systematic reviews have become important tools enabling clinicians and patients to make health-care decisions based on evidence from all the available high-quality studies. The move towards identifying and aggregating the highest quality evidence has been led by the Cochrane Collaboration, which this year celebrates 20 years of preparing and publishing systematic reviews. This paper outlines the achievements, progress and challenges of this enterprise to date, with a particular focus on systematic reviews of reproductive medicine.",
keywords = "Cochrane reviews, menstrual disorders, subfertility, assisted reproduction, systematic reviews",
author = "Cindy Farquhar and Vivienne Moore and Siladitya Bhattacharya and Debbie Blake and Andy Vail and Jane Thomas and Ying Cheong and Marian Showell and Helen Nagels and Jane Marjoribanks",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1093/humrep/det334",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2883--2892",
journal = "Human Reproduction",
issn = "0268-1161",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twenty years of Cochrane reviews in menstrual disorders and subfertility

AU - Farquhar, Cindy

AU - Moore, Vivienne

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

AU - Blake, Debbie

AU - Vail, Andy

AU - Thomas, Jane

AU - Cheong, Ying

AU - Showell, Marian

AU - Nagels, Helen

AU - Marjoribanks, Jane

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The past three decades have seen considerable change in the understanding of clinical research methods. There has been an acceptance that RCTs are the best way of establishing treatment effectiveness and a recognition that, while single studies are useful, pooling knowledge from a complete body of work is likely to provide the best evidence. Advances in methodology have been mirrored by the many advances in the field of reproductive medicine, such as assisted reproduction, assessment of male fertility, ovulation induction and laparoscopic surgery. Together, they have led to welcome improvements in the outcomes of fertility treatments. In particular, systematic reviews have become important tools enabling clinicians and patients to make health-care decisions based on evidence from all the available high-quality studies. The move towards identifying and aggregating the highest quality evidence has been led by the Cochrane Collaboration, which this year celebrates 20 years of preparing and publishing systematic reviews. This paper outlines the achievements, progress and challenges of this enterprise to date, with a particular focus on systematic reviews of reproductive medicine.

AB - The past three decades have seen considerable change in the understanding of clinical research methods. There has been an acceptance that RCTs are the best way of establishing treatment effectiveness and a recognition that, while single studies are useful, pooling knowledge from a complete body of work is likely to provide the best evidence. Advances in methodology have been mirrored by the many advances in the field of reproductive medicine, such as assisted reproduction, assessment of male fertility, ovulation induction and laparoscopic surgery. Together, they have led to welcome improvements in the outcomes of fertility treatments. In particular, systematic reviews have become important tools enabling clinicians and patients to make health-care decisions based on evidence from all the available high-quality studies. The move towards identifying and aggregating the highest quality evidence has been led by the Cochrane Collaboration, which this year celebrates 20 years of preparing and publishing systematic reviews. This paper outlines the achievements, progress and challenges of this enterprise to date, with a particular focus on systematic reviews of reproductive medicine.

KW - Cochrane reviews

KW - menstrual disorders

KW - subfertility

KW - assisted reproduction

KW - systematic reviews

U2 - 10.1093/humrep/det334

DO - 10.1093/humrep/det334

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2883

EP - 2892

JO - Human Reproduction

JF - Human Reproduction

SN - 0268-1161

IS - 11

ER -