Twenty years of the habitats directive

a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management

A Pillai, D Heptinstall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Reintroduction of species is viewed as a conventional conservation tool across Europe. Yet, the reintroduction of a species into an area where it was formerly extinct in a country can involve considerable social and economic impacts. Effective national management strategies for European protected species must comply with the protection laid down in the Habitats or Birds Directives whilst, at the same time, addressing human socio-economic concerns. This case study on the Eurasian beaver (listed in Habitats Directive Annexes II and IV) examines the strict protection afforded to the beaver (Article 12) and the ways in which exceptions to that protection, or derogations (Article 16), may form part of national or regional species management strategies. Case studies from the Netherlands, Germany and Latvia illustrate conservation success but, at the same time, provide a cautionary tale about the management of a species with a well developed capacity for ecosystem engineering. What happens when a previously extinct or endangered species with the potential for impacts on human activities becomes abundant? While national law and policy makers must remain attentive to conservation concerns, ensuring the strict protection of the species, they must also be mindful of changes both in human political and socio-economic concerns and in the dynamic natural world. Twenty years on, is the protection afforded by the Habitats Directive sufficiently pragmatic and flexible to take account of changes in species conservation status and in the social, political and economic needs of Member States?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-46
Number of pages20
JournalEnvironmental Law Review
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

habitat
reintroduction
ecosystem engineering
species conservation
social impact
conservation status
endangered species
economic impact
human activity
species reintroduction
directive
bird
economics
socioeconomics
need
policy
protected species
Europe

Keywords

  • reintroduction of a species
  • effective national management strategies
  • habitats directive

Cite this

Twenty years of the habitats directive : a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management. / Pillai, A; Heptinstall, D.

In: Environmental Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 27-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2d989fb2436a4265ae9a87bb290ddb7e,
title = "Twenty years of the habitats directive: a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management",
abstract = "Reintroduction of species is viewed as a conventional conservation tool across Europe. Yet, the reintroduction of a species into an area where it was formerly extinct in a country can involve considerable social and economic impacts. Effective national management strategies for European protected species must comply with the protection laid down in the Habitats or Birds Directives whilst, at the same time, addressing human socio-economic concerns. This case study on the Eurasian beaver (listed in Habitats Directive Annexes II and IV) examines the strict protection afforded to the beaver (Article 12) and the ways in which exceptions to that protection, or derogations (Article 16), may form part of national or regional species management strategies. Case studies from the Netherlands, Germany and Latvia illustrate conservation success but, at the same time, provide a cautionary tale about the management of a species with a well developed capacity for ecosystem engineering. What happens when a previously extinct or endangered species with the potential for impacts on human activities becomes abundant? While national law and policy makers must remain attentive to conservation concerns, ensuring the strict protection of the species, they must also be mindful of changes both in human political and socio-economic concerns and in the dynamic natural world. Twenty years on, is the protection afforded by the Habitats Directive sufficiently pragmatic and flexible to take account of changes in species conservation status and in the social, political and economic needs of Member States?",
keywords = "reintroduction of a species, effective national management strategies, habitats directive",
author = "A Pillai and D Heptinstall",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1350/enlr.2013.15.1.174",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "27--46",
journal = "Environmental Law Review",
issn = "1461-4529",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Twenty years of the habitats directive

T2 - a case study on species reintroduction, protection and management

AU - Pillai, A

AU - Heptinstall, D

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Reintroduction of species is viewed as a conventional conservation tool across Europe. Yet, the reintroduction of a species into an area where it was formerly extinct in a country can involve considerable social and economic impacts. Effective national management strategies for European protected species must comply with the protection laid down in the Habitats or Birds Directives whilst, at the same time, addressing human socio-economic concerns. This case study on the Eurasian beaver (listed in Habitats Directive Annexes II and IV) examines the strict protection afforded to the beaver (Article 12) and the ways in which exceptions to that protection, or derogations (Article 16), may form part of national or regional species management strategies. Case studies from the Netherlands, Germany and Latvia illustrate conservation success but, at the same time, provide a cautionary tale about the management of a species with a well developed capacity for ecosystem engineering. What happens when a previously extinct or endangered species with the potential for impacts on human activities becomes abundant? While national law and policy makers must remain attentive to conservation concerns, ensuring the strict protection of the species, they must also be mindful of changes both in human political and socio-economic concerns and in the dynamic natural world. Twenty years on, is the protection afforded by the Habitats Directive sufficiently pragmatic and flexible to take account of changes in species conservation status and in the social, political and economic needs of Member States?

AB - Reintroduction of species is viewed as a conventional conservation tool across Europe. Yet, the reintroduction of a species into an area where it was formerly extinct in a country can involve considerable social and economic impacts. Effective national management strategies for European protected species must comply with the protection laid down in the Habitats or Birds Directives whilst, at the same time, addressing human socio-economic concerns. This case study on the Eurasian beaver (listed in Habitats Directive Annexes II and IV) examines the strict protection afforded to the beaver (Article 12) and the ways in which exceptions to that protection, or derogations (Article 16), may form part of national or regional species management strategies. Case studies from the Netherlands, Germany and Latvia illustrate conservation success but, at the same time, provide a cautionary tale about the management of a species with a well developed capacity for ecosystem engineering. What happens when a previously extinct or endangered species with the potential for impacts on human activities becomes abundant? While national law and policy makers must remain attentive to conservation concerns, ensuring the strict protection of the species, they must also be mindful of changes both in human political and socio-economic concerns and in the dynamic natural world. Twenty years on, is the protection afforded by the Habitats Directive sufficiently pragmatic and flexible to take account of changes in species conservation status and in the social, political and economic needs of Member States?

KW - reintroduction of a species

KW - effective national management strategies

KW - habitats directive

U2 - 10.1350/enlr.2013.15.1.174

DO - 10.1350/enlr.2013.15.1.174

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 27

EP - 46

JO - Environmental Law Review

JF - Environmental Law Review

SN - 1461-4529

IS - 1

ER -