Two rivers: the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management

Gro Birgit Ween, Benedict Colombi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Noray and columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sami and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with hos such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation#s natural/resouce management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economices, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and american constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' of hiearhcies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labelled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted, while in the Tana, biological sustainability became priortized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-495
Number of pages27
JournalSustainability
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Natural resources management
natural resources
resource management
politics
natural resource
Rivers
river
Sustainable development
sustainability
management
extinction
post-colonial society
indigenous population
Coastal zones
rights
threat
Economics
coast
science
economics

Keywords

  • politics of nature
  • cultural sustainability
  • biological sustainability
  • salmon
  • indigeneity
  • postcolonial epistemology

Cite this

Two rivers : the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management. / Ween, Gro Birgit; Colombi, Benedict.

In: Sustainability, Vol. 5, No. 2, 31.01.2013, p. 478-495.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ween, Gro Birgit ; Colombi, Benedict. / Two rivers : the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management. In: Sustainability. 2013 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 478-495.
@article{ab3726f4fbd940cd82046bb64cbc147b,
title = "Two rivers: the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management",
abstract = "This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Noray and columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sami and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with hos such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation#s natural/resouce management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economices, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and american constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' of hiearhcies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labelled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted, while in the Tana, biological sustainability became priortized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.",
keywords = "politics of nature, cultural sustainability, biological sustainability, salmon, indigeneity, postcolonial epistemology",
author = "Ween, {Gro Birgit} and Benedict Colombi",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.3390/su5020478",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "478--495",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two rivers

T2 - the politics of wild salmon, indigenous rights and natural resource management

AU - Ween, Gro Birgit

AU - Colombi, Benedict

PY - 2013/1/31

Y1 - 2013/1/31

N2 - This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Noray and columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sami and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with hos such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation#s natural/resouce management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economices, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and american constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' of hiearhcies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labelled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted, while in the Tana, biological sustainability became priortized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.

AB - This paper compares two rivers, Tana River in Northern Noray and columbia River on the northwest coast of the United States of America. both rivers host indigenous populations, the Sami and the Nez Perce, whose cultural and material existence depends upon salmon. Because these people live indigenously within highly industrial, postcolonial societies, their lives have been part of larger economic, political and legal structures for substantial periods of time. In these rivers, peoples have been, and are currently dealing with the possibility of salmon extinction. This article is concerned with hos such a crisis has been interpreted and acted upon within two nation#s natural/resouce management regimes. We observe how the threat of extinction has initiated commotion where nature, economices, legal instruments, politics and science have come into play, in ways that reveal differences in the Norwegian and american constellations of interests and powers, manifested as differences in natural resource management regimes' of hiearhcies of positions. The outcome is the protection of different entities, which could be labelled cultural and biological sustainability. In the Columbia River, cultural sustainability was promoted, while in the Tana, biological sustainability became priortized. By way of our comparison we ask if the protection of one kind of sustainability has to be to the detriment of the other.

KW - politics of nature

KW - cultural sustainability

KW - biological sustainability

KW - salmon

KW - indigeneity

KW - postcolonial epistemology

U2 - 10.3390/su5020478

DO - 10.3390/su5020478

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 478

EP - 495

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 2

ER -