Two’s company, three’s a crowd

Individuation is necessary for object recognition

Ramakrishna Chakravarthi (Corresponding Author), Amy Herbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Object recognition is essential for navigating the real world. Despite decades of research on this topic, the processing steps necessary for recognition remain unclear. In this study, we examined the necessity and role of individuation, the ability to select a small number of spatially distinct objects irrespective of their identity, in the recognition process. More specifically, we tested if the ability to rapidly individuate and enumerate a small number of objects (subitizing) can be impaired by crowding. Crowding is flanker-induced interference that specifically impedes the recognition process. We found that subitizing is impaired when objects are close to each other (Experiment 1), and if the target objects are surrounded by irrelevant but perceptually similar flankers (Experiments 2-4). This impairment cannot be attributed to confusion between targets and flankers, wherein flankers are inadvertently included in or targets are excluded from enumeration (Experiments 3-4). Importantly, the flanker induced interference was comparable in both subitizing and crowding tasks (Experiment 4), suggesting that individuation and identification share a common processing pathway. We conclude that individuation is an essential stage in the object recognition pipeline and argue for a cohesive proposal that both crowding and subitizing are due to limitations of selective attention.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-82
Number of pages14
JournalCognition
Volume184
Early online dateDec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Individuation
Crowding
personality development
Aptitude
experiment
interference
ability
Experiment
Object Recognition
Subitizing
Crowds
Research
Interference

Keywords

  • Individuation
  • recognition
  • subitizing
  • crowding
  • enumeration
  • attention
  • Enumeration
  • Attention
  • Subitizing
  • Crowding
  • Recognition
  • ATTENTION
  • NUMBERS
  • RESOLUTION
  • MOTION
  • NEURAL MEASURES
  • TRACKING
  • ACUITY
  • BOTTLENECK
  • SIMILARITY

Cite this

Two’s company, three’s a crowd : Individuation is necessary for object recognition. / Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna (Corresponding Author); Herbert, Amy.

In: Cognition, Vol. 184, 03.2019, p. 69-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70402c3f811d48e1aeabb01f60abd20f,
title = "Two’s company, three’s a crowd: Individuation is necessary for object recognition",
abstract = "Object recognition is essential for navigating the real world. Despite decades of research on this topic, the processing steps necessary for recognition remain unclear. In this study, we examined the necessity and role of individuation, the ability to select a small number of spatially distinct objects irrespective of their identity, in the recognition process. More specifically, we tested if the ability to rapidly individuate and enumerate a small number of objects (subitizing) can be impaired by crowding. Crowding is flanker-induced interference that specifically impedes the recognition process. We found that subitizing is impaired when objects are close to each other (Experiment 1), and if the target objects are surrounded by irrelevant but perceptually similar flankers (Experiments 2-4). This impairment cannot be attributed to confusion between targets and flankers, wherein flankers are inadvertently included in or targets are excluded from enumeration (Experiments 3-4). Importantly, the flanker induced interference was comparable in both subitizing and crowding tasks (Experiment 4), suggesting that individuation and identification share a common processing pathway. We conclude that individuation is an essential stage in the object recognition pipeline and argue for a cohesive proposal that both crowding and subitizing are due to limitations of selective attention.",
keywords = "Individuation, recognition, subitizing, crowding, enumeration, attention, Enumeration, Attention, Subitizing, Crowding, Recognition, ATTENTION, NUMBERS, RESOLUTION, MOTION, NEURAL MEASURES, TRACKING, ACUITY, BOTTLENECK, SIMILARITY",
author = "Ramakrishna Chakravarthi and Amy Herbert",
note = "We thank Marlene Poncet and Patrick Cavanagh for helpful suggestions on the manuscript. We thank Louise Hill for help with some of the data collection. We are grateful to the reviewers and editor for their insightful comments on the framing of the study and our interpretation of the results, which led us to rethink the implications of our findings.",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.008",
language = "English",
volume = "184",
pages = "69--82",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Two’s company, three’s a crowd

T2 - Individuation is necessary for object recognition

AU - Chakravarthi, Ramakrishna

AU - Herbert, Amy

N1 - We thank Marlene Poncet and Patrick Cavanagh for helpful suggestions on the manuscript. We thank Louise Hill for help with some of the data collection. We are grateful to the reviewers and editor for their insightful comments on the framing of the study and our interpretation of the results, which led us to rethink the implications of our findings.

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - Object recognition is essential for navigating the real world. Despite decades of research on this topic, the processing steps necessary for recognition remain unclear. In this study, we examined the necessity and role of individuation, the ability to select a small number of spatially distinct objects irrespective of their identity, in the recognition process. More specifically, we tested if the ability to rapidly individuate and enumerate a small number of objects (subitizing) can be impaired by crowding. Crowding is flanker-induced interference that specifically impedes the recognition process. We found that subitizing is impaired when objects are close to each other (Experiment 1), and if the target objects are surrounded by irrelevant but perceptually similar flankers (Experiments 2-4). This impairment cannot be attributed to confusion between targets and flankers, wherein flankers are inadvertently included in or targets are excluded from enumeration (Experiments 3-4). Importantly, the flanker induced interference was comparable in both subitizing and crowding tasks (Experiment 4), suggesting that individuation and identification share a common processing pathway. We conclude that individuation is an essential stage in the object recognition pipeline and argue for a cohesive proposal that both crowding and subitizing are due to limitations of selective attention.

AB - Object recognition is essential for navigating the real world. Despite decades of research on this topic, the processing steps necessary for recognition remain unclear. In this study, we examined the necessity and role of individuation, the ability to select a small number of spatially distinct objects irrespective of their identity, in the recognition process. More specifically, we tested if the ability to rapidly individuate and enumerate a small number of objects (subitizing) can be impaired by crowding. Crowding is flanker-induced interference that specifically impedes the recognition process. We found that subitizing is impaired when objects are close to each other (Experiment 1), and if the target objects are surrounded by irrelevant but perceptually similar flankers (Experiments 2-4). This impairment cannot be attributed to confusion between targets and flankers, wherein flankers are inadvertently included in or targets are excluded from enumeration (Experiments 3-4). Importantly, the flanker induced interference was comparable in both subitizing and crowding tasks (Experiment 4), suggesting that individuation and identification share a common processing pathway. We conclude that individuation is an essential stage in the object recognition pipeline and argue for a cohesive proposal that both crowding and subitizing are due to limitations of selective attention.

KW - Individuation

KW - recognition

KW - subitizing

KW - crowding

KW - enumeration

KW - attention

KW - Enumeration

KW - Attention

KW - Subitizing

KW - Crowding

KW - Recognition

KW - ATTENTION

KW - NUMBERS

KW - RESOLUTION

KW - MOTION

KW - NEURAL MEASURES

KW - TRACKING

KW - ACUITY

KW - BOTTLENECK

KW - SIMILARITY

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/twos-company-threes-crowd-individuation-necessary-object-recognition

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.008

M3 - Article

VL - 184

SP - 69

EP - 82

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

ER -