Typicality and Object Reference

Margaret Ann Mitchell, Ehud Baruch Reiter, Kees van Deemter

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Does the typicality of an object affect how we identify it?
When we produce initial reference to a visible object, we are
influenced by a variety of factors, including what is visually
salient (bottom-up influences) as well as our previous experiences
with the object (top-down influences). In this study, we
seek to understand how the top-down influence of typicality
affects initial reference to an object. We use real world, everyday
objects, and focus on the visual properties of SHAPE and
MATERIAL. Our findings suggest that there is a tendency to
select the atypical over the typical. But we have only begun
to scratch the surface of understanding reference to real world
objects. The corresponding annotated corpus from this study
will be made available for future research on modeling reference
in visual domains.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
EditorsMarkus Knauff, Michael Pauen, Natalie Sebanz, Ipke Wachsmuth
Place of PublicationAustin, TX
PublisherCognitive Science Society
Pages3062-3067
Number of pages6
ISBN (Print)978-0-9768318-9-1
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013
Event35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society - Berlin, Germany
Duration: 31 Jul 20133 Aug 2013

Conference

Conference35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
CountryGermany
CityBerlin
Period31/07/133/08/13

Keywords

  • referring expressions
  • psycholinguistic experiment

Cite this

Mitchell, M. A., Reiter, E. B., & van Deemter, K. (2013). Typicality and Object Reference. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3062-3067). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Typicality and Object Reference. / Mitchell, Margaret Ann; Reiter, Ehud Baruch; van Deemter, Kees.

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. ed. / Markus Knauff; Michael Pauen; Natalie Sebanz; Ipke Wachsmuth. Austin, TX : Cognitive Science Society, 2013. p. 3062-3067.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Mitchell, MA, Reiter, EB & van Deemter, K 2013, Typicality and Object Reference. in M Knauff, M Pauen, N Sebanz & I Wachsmuth (eds), Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp. 3062-3067, 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, Germany, 31/07/13.
Mitchell MA, Reiter EB, van Deemter K. Typicality and Object Reference. In Knauff M, Pauen M, Sebanz N, Wachsmuth I, editors, Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. 2013. p. 3062-3067
Mitchell, Margaret Ann ; Reiter, Ehud Baruch ; van Deemter, Kees. / Typicality and Object Reference. Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. editor / Markus Knauff ; Michael Pauen ; Natalie Sebanz ; Ipke Wachsmuth. Austin, TX : Cognitive Science Society, 2013. pp. 3062-3067
@inproceedings{c0f5a3d26e014ee4b27d50f597bf2975,
title = "Typicality and Object Reference",
abstract = "Does the typicality of an object affect how we identify it?When we produce initial reference to a visible object, we areinfluenced by a variety of factors, including what is visuallysalient (bottom-up influences) as well as our previous experienceswith the object (top-down influences). In this study, weseek to understand how the top-down influence of typicalityaffects initial reference to an object. We use real world, everydayobjects, and focus on the visual properties of SHAPE andMATERIAL. Our findings suggest that there is a tendency toselect the atypical over the typical. But we have only begunto scratch the surface of understanding reference to real worldobjects. The corresponding annotated corpus from this studywill be made available for future research on modeling referencein visual domains.",
keywords = "referring expressions, psycholinguistic experiment",
author = "Mitchell, {Margaret Ann} and Reiter, {Ehud Baruch} and {van Deemter}, Kees",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-0-9768318-9-1",
pages = "3062--3067",
editor = "Markus Knauff and Pauen, {Michael } and Natalie Sebanz and Ipke Wachsmuth",
booktitle = "Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics",
publisher = "Cognitive Science Society",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Typicality and Object Reference

AU - Mitchell, Margaret Ann

AU - Reiter, Ehud Baruch

AU - van Deemter, Kees

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - Does the typicality of an object affect how we identify it?When we produce initial reference to a visible object, we areinfluenced by a variety of factors, including what is visuallysalient (bottom-up influences) as well as our previous experienceswith the object (top-down influences). In this study, weseek to understand how the top-down influence of typicalityaffects initial reference to an object. We use real world, everydayobjects, and focus on the visual properties of SHAPE andMATERIAL. Our findings suggest that there is a tendency toselect the atypical over the typical. But we have only begunto scratch the surface of understanding reference to real worldobjects. The corresponding annotated corpus from this studywill be made available for future research on modeling referencein visual domains.

AB - Does the typicality of an object affect how we identify it?When we produce initial reference to a visible object, we areinfluenced by a variety of factors, including what is visuallysalient (bottom-up influences) as well as our previous experienceswith the object (top-down influences). In this study, weseek to understand how the top-down influence of typicalityaffects initial reference to an object. We use real world, everydayobjects, and focus on the visual properties of SHAPE andMATERIAL. Our findings suggest that there is a tendency toselect the atypical over the typical. But we have only begunto scratch the surface of understanding reference to real worldobjects. The corresponding annotated corpus from this studywill be made available for future research on modeling referencein visual domains.

KW - referring expressions

KW - psycholinguistic experiment

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 978-0-9768318-9-1

SP - 3062

EP - 3067

BT - Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics

A2 - Knauff, Markus

A2 - Pauen, Michael

A2 - Sebanz, Natalie

A2 - Wachsmuth, Ipke

PB - Cognitive Science Society

CY - Austin, TX

ER -