Underestimating the damage

interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the Deepwater Horizon/BP incident

Rob Williams, Shane Gero, Lars Bejder, John Calambokidis, Scott D. Kraus, David Lusseau, Andrew J. Read, Jooke Robbins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

88 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evaluating impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems is difficult when effects occur out of plain sight. Oil spill severity is often measured by the number of marine birds and mammals killed, but only a small fraction of carcasses are recovered. The Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was the largest in the U.S. history, but some reports implied modest environmental impacts, in part because of a relatively low number (101) of observed marine mammal mortalities. We estimate historical carcass-detection rates for 14 cetacean species in the northern Gulf of Mexico that have estimates of abundance, survival rates, and stranding records. This preliminary analysis suggests that carcasses are recovered, on an average, from only 2% (range: 0-6.2%) of cetacean deaths. Thus, the true death toll could be 50 times the number of carcasses recovered, given no additional information. We discuss caveats to this estimate, but present it as a counterpoint to illustrate the magnitude of misrepresentation implicit in presenting observed carcass counts without similar qualification. We urge methodological development to develop appropriate multipliers. Analytical methods are required to account explicitly for low probability of carcass recovery from cryptic mortality events (e.g., oil spills, ship strikes, bycatch in unmonitored fisheries and acoustic trauma).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)228-233
Number of pages6
JournalConservation Letters
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • Anthropogenic impacts
  • dolphin
  • Deepwater Horizon
  • Gulf of Mexico
  • mortality
  • oil
  • strandings
  • Valdez oil-spill
  • Exxon-Valdez
  • marine biodiversity
  • open-ocean
  • conservation
  • impacts
  • lessons
  • whales

Cite this

Underestimating the damage : interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the Deepwater Horizon/BP incident. / Williams, Rob; Gero, Shane; Bejder, Lars; Calambokidis, John; Kraus, Scott D.; Lusseau, David; Read, Andrew J.; Robbins, Jooke.

In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2011, p. 228-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Rob ; Gero, Shane ; Bejder, Lars ; Calambokidis, John ; Kraus, Scott D. ; Lusseau, David ; Read, Andrew J. ; Robbins, Jooke. / Underestimating the damage : interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the Deepwater Horizon/BP incident. In: Conservation Letters. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 228-233.
@article{65598c389aee44d7a141f82a6974fe4c,
title = "Underestimating the damage: interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the Deepwater Horizon/BP incident",
abstract = "Evaluating impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems is difficult when effects occur out of plain sight. Oil spill severity is often measured by the number of marine birds and mammals killed, but only a small fraction of carcasses are recovered. The Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was the largest in the U.S. history, but some reports implied modest environmental impacts, in part because of a relatively low number (101) of observed marine mammal mortalities. We estimate historical carcass-detection rates for 14 cetacean species in the northern Gulf of Mexico that have estimates of abundance, survival rates, and stranding records. This preliminary analysis suggests that carcasses are recovered, on an average, from only 2{\%} (range: 0-6.2{\%}) of cetacean deaths. Thus, the true death toll could be 50 times the number of carcasses recovered, given no additional information. We discuss caveats to this estimate, but present it as a counterpoint to illustrate the magnitude of misrepresentation implicit in presenting observed carcass counts without similar qualification. We urge methodological development to develop appropriate multipliers. Analytical methods are required to account explicitly for low probability of carcass recovery from cryptic mortality events (e.g., oil spills, ship strikes, bycatch in unmonitored fisheries and acoustic trauma).",
keywords = "Anthropogenic impacts, dolphin, Deepwater Horizon, Gulf of Mexico, mortality, oil, strandings, Valdez oil-spill, Exxon-Valdez, marine biodiversity, open-ocean, conservation, impacts, lessons, whales",
author = "Rob Williams and Shane Gero and Lars Bejder and John Calambokidis and Kraus, {Scott D.} and David Lusseau and Read, {Andrew J.} and Jooke Robbins",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00168.x",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "228--233",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
issn = "1755-263X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underestimating the damage

T2 - interpreting cetacean carcass recoveries in the context of the Deepwater Horizon/BP incident

AU - Williams, Rob

AU - Gero, Shane

AU - Bejder, Lars

AU - Calambokidis, John

AU - Kraus, Scott D.

AU - Lusseau, David

AU - Read, Andrew J.

AU - Robbins, Jooke

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Evaluating impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems is difficult when effects occur out of plain sight. Oil spill severity is often measured by the number of marine birds and mammals killed, but only a small fraction of carcasses are recovered. The Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was the largest in the U.S. history, but some reports implied modest environmental impacts, in part because of a relatively low number (101) of observed marine mammal mortalities. We estimate historical carcass-detection rates for 14 cetacean species in the northern Gulf of Mexico that have estimates of abundance, survival rates, and stranding records. This preliminary analysis suggests that carcasses are recovered, on an average, from only 2% (range: 0-6.2%) of cetacean deaths. Thus, the true death toll could be 50 times the number of carcasses recovered, given no additional information. We discuss caveats to this estimate, but present it as a counterpoint to illustrate the magnitude of misrepresentation implicit in presenting observed carcass counts without similar qualification. We urge methodological development to develop appropriate multipliers. Analytical methods are required to account explicitly for low probability of carcass recovery from cryptic mortality events (e.g., oil spills, ship strikes, bycatch in unmonitored fisheries and acoustic trauma).

AB - Evaluating impacts of human activities on marine ecosystems is difficult when effects occur out of plain sight. Oil spill severity is often measured by the number of marine birds and mammals killed, but only a small fraction of carcasses are recovered. The Deepwater Horizon/BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico was the largest in the U.S. history, but some reports implied modest environmental impacts, in part because of a relatively low number (101) of observed marine mammal mortalities. We estimate historical carcass-detection rates for 14 cetacean species in the northern Gulf of Mexico that have estimates of abundance, survival rates, and stranding records. This preliminary analysis suggests that carcasses are recovered, on an average, from only 2% (range: 0-6.2%) of cetacean deaths. Thus, the true death toll could be 50 times the number of carcasses recovered, given no additional information. We discuss caveats to this estimate, but present it as a counterpoint to illustrate the magnitude of misrepresentation implicit in presenting observed carcass counts without similar qualification. We urge methodological development to develop appropriate multipliers. Analytical methods are required to account explicitly for low probability of carcass recovery from cryptic mortality events (e.g., oil spills, ship strikes, bycatch in unmonitored fisheries and acoustic trauma).

KW - Anthropogenic impacts

KW - dolphin

KW - Deepwater Horizon

KW - Gulf of Mexico

KW - mortality

KW - oil

KW - strandings

KW - Valdez oil-spill

KW - Exxon-Valdez

KW - marine biodiversity

KW - open-ocean

KW - conservation

KW - impacts

KW - lessons

KW - whales

U2 - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00168.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00168.x

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 228

EP - 233

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

IS - 3

ER -