Underground allies

how and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves?: What are the fitness, regulatory, and practical implications of defence-related signaling between plants via common mycelial networks?

Zdenka Babikova, David Johnson, Toby Bruce, John Pickett, Lucy Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most land plants associate with mycorrhizal fungi that can connect roots of neighboring plants in common mycelial networks (CMNs). Recent evidence shows that CMNs transfer warning signals of pathogen and aphid attack between plants. However, we do not know how defence-related signaling via CMNs operates or how ubiquitous it is. Nor do we know what the ecological relevance and fitness consequences are, particularly from the perspective of the mycorrhizal fungus. Here, we focus on the potential fitness benefits for mycorrhizal fungi and outline hypothetical scenarios in which signal transfer via CMNs is modulated in order to acquire the most benefit for the fungus (i.e. acquisition of carbon) for minimal cost. We speculate that the signal may be quantitative and may elicit plant defence responses on different levels depending on the distance the signal is transferred. Finally, we discuss the possibility of practical applications of this phenomenon for crop protection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-26
Number of pages6
JournalBioEssays
Volume36
Issue number1
Early online date15 Oct 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Fungi
Embryophyta
Aphids
Plant Roots
Pathogens
Crops
Carbon
Costs and Cost Analysis
metsulfuron methyl
Costs

Keywords

  • fungi
  • mycelium
  • mycorrhizae
  • plants
  • signal transduction
  • arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  • common mycelial networks
  • defence-related metabolism
  • fitness consequences
  • herbivores
  • hyphae
  • rhizosphere signaling

Cite this

Underground allies : how and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves?: What are the fitness, regulatory, and practical implications of defence-related signaling between plants via common mycelial networks? / Babikova, Zdenka; Johnson, David; Bruce, Toby; Pickett, John; Gilbert, Lucy.

In: BioEssays, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 21-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{26c256386c764e189d11778f38e1e903,
title = "Underground allies: how and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves?: What are the fitness, regulatory, and practical implications of defence-related signaling between plants via common mycelial networks?",
abstract = "Most land plants associate with mycorrhizal fungi that can connect roots of neighboring plants in common mycelial networks (CMNs). Recent evidence shows that CMNs transfer warning signals of pathogen and aphid attack between plants. However, we do not know how defence-related signaling via CMNs operates or how ubiquitous it is. Nor do we know what the ecological relevance and fitness consequences are, particularly from the perspective of the mycorrhizal fungus. Here, we focus on the potential fitness benefits for mycorrhizal fungi and outline hypothetical scenarios in which signal transfer via CMNs is modulated in order to acquire the most benefit for the fungus (i.e. acquisition of carbon) for minimal cost. We speculate that the signal may be quantitative and may elicit plant defence responses on different levels depending on the distance the signal is transferred. Finally, we discuss the possibility of practical applications of this phenomenon for crop protection.",
keywords = "fungi, mycelium, mycorrhizae, plants, signal transduction, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, common mycelial networks, defence-related metabolism, fitness consequences, herbivores, hyphae, rhizosphere signaling",
author = "Zdenka Babikova and David Johnson and Toby Bruce and John Pickett and Lucy Gilbert",
note = "{\circledC} 2014 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bies.201300092",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "21--26",
journal = "BioEssays",
issn = "0265-9247",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underground allies

T2 - how and why do mycelial networks help plants defend themselves?: What are the fitness, regulatory, and practical implications of defence-related signaling between plants via common mycelial networks?

AU - Babikova, Zdenka

AU - Johnson, David

AU - Bruce, Toby

AU - Pickett, John

AU - Gilbert, Lucy

N1 - © 2014 WILEY Periodicals, Inc.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Most land plants associate with mycorrhizal fungi that can connect roots of neighboring plants in common mycelial networks (CMNs). Recent evidence shows that CMNs transfer warning signals of pathogen and aphid attack between plants. However, we do not know how defence-related signaling via CMNs operates or how ubiquitous it is. Nor do we know what the ecological relevance and fitness consequences are, particularly from the perspective of the mycorrhizal fungus. Here, we focus on the potential fitness benefits for mycorrhizal fungi and outline hypothetical scenarios in which signal transfer via CMNs is modulated in order to acquire the most benefit for the fungus (i.e. acquisition of carbon) for minimal cost. We speculate that the signal may be quantitative and may elicit plant defence responses on different levels depending on the distance the signal is transferred. Finally, we discuss the possibility of practical applications of this phenomenon for crop protection.

AB - Most land plants associate with mycorrhizal fungi that can connect roots of neighboring plants in common mycelial networks (CMNs). Recent evidence shows that CMNs transfer warning signals of pathogen and aphid attack between plants. However, we do not know how defence-related signaling via CMNs operates or how ubiquitous it is. Nor do we know what the ecological relevance and fitness consequences are, particularly from the perspective of the mycorrhizal fungus. Here, we focus on the potential fitness benefits for mycorrhizal fungi and outline hypothetical scenarios in which signal transfer via CMNs is modulated in order to acquire the most benefit for the fungus (i.e. acquisition of carbon) for minimal cost. We speculate that the signal may be quantitative and may elicit plant defence responses on different levels depending on the distance the signal is transferred. Finally, we discuss the possibility of practical applications of this phenomenon for crop protection.

KW - fungi

KW - mycelium

KW - mycorrhizae

KW - plants

KW - signal transduction

KW - arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

KW - common mycelial networks

KW - defence-related metabolism

KW - fitness consequences

KW - herbivores

KW - hyphae

KW - rhizosphere signaling

U2 - 10.1002/bies.201300092

DO - 10.1002/bies.201300092

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 21

EP - 26

JO - BioEssays

JF - BioEssays

SN - 0265-9247

IS - 1

ER -