Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems

England, the USA and Australia

Zoe Morrison*, Ann Robertson, Kathrin Cresswell, Sarah Crowe, Aziz Sheikh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As governments commit to national electronic health record (EHR) systems, there is increasing international interest in identifying effective implementation strategies. We draw on Coiera's typology of national programmes - 'top-down', 'bottom-up' and 'middle-out' - to review EHR implementation strategies in three exemplar countries: England, the USA and Australia. In comparing and contrasting three approaches, we show how different healthcare systems, national policy contexts and anticipated benefits have shaped initial strategies. We reflect on progress and likely developments in the face of continually changing circumstances. Our review shows that irrespective of the initial strategy, over time there is likely to be convergence on the negotiated, devolved middle-out approach, which aims to balance the interests and responsibilities of local healthcare constituencies and national government to achieve national connectivity. We conclude that, accepting the current lack of empirical evidence, the flexibility offered by the middle-out approach may make this the best initial national strategy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-42
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
England
Health
Delivery of Health Care
Federal Government

Keywords

  • electronic health records
  • implementation
  • information technology
  • international approaches

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Biotechnology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems : England, the USA and Australia. / Morrison, Zoe; Robertson, Ann; Cresswell, Kathrin; Crowe, Sarah; Sheikh, Aziz.

In: Journal of Healthcare Engineering, Vol. 2, No. 1, 03.2011, p. 25-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morrison, Zoe ; Robertson, Ann ; Cresswell, Kathrin ; Crowe, Sarah ; Sheikh, Aziz. / Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems : England, the USA and Australia. In: Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2011 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 25-42.
@article{884e723b865648aba2428da8b3c90f2d,
title = "Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems: England, the USA and Australia",
abstract = "As governments commit to national electronic health record (EHR) systems, there is increasing international interest in identifying effective implementation strategies. We draw on Coiera's typology of national programmes - 'top-down', 'bottom-up' and 'middle-out' - to review EHR implementation strategies in three exemplar countries: England, the USA and Australia. In comparing and contrasting three approaches, we show how different healthcare systems, national policy contexts and anticipated benefits have shaped initial strategies. We reflect on progress and likely developments in the face of continually changing circumstances. Our review shows that irrespective of the initial strategy, over time there is likely to be convergence on the negotiated, devolved middle-out approach, which aims to balance the interests and responsibilities of local healthcare constituencies and national government to achieve national connectivity. We conclude that, accepting the current lack of empirical evidence, the flexibility offered by the middle-out approach may make this the best initial national strategy.",
keywords = "electronic health records, implementation, information technology, international approaches",
author = "Zoe Morrison and Ann Robertson and Kathrin Cresswell and Sarah Crowe and Aziz Sheikh",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1260/2040-2295.2.1.25",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "25--42",
journal = "Journal of Healthcare Engineering",
issn = "2040-2295",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding contrasting approaches to nationwide implementations of electronic health record systems

T2 - England, the USA and Australia

AU - Morrison, Zoe

AU - Robertson, Ann

AU - Cresswell, Kathrin

AU - Crowe, Sarah

AU - Sheikh, Aziz

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - As governments commit to national electronic health record (EHR) systems, there is increasing international interest in identifying effective implementation strategies. We draw on Coiera's typology of national programmes - 'top-down', 'bottom-up' and 'middle-out' - to review EHR implementation strategies in three exemplar countries: England, the USA and Australia. In comparing and contrasting three approaches, we show how different healthcare systems, national policy contexts and anticipated benefits have shaped initial strategies. We reflect on progress and likely developments in the face of continually changing circumstances. Our review shows that irrespective of the initial strategy, over time there is likely to be convergence on the negotiated, devolved middle-out approach, which aims to balance the interests and responsibilities of local healthcare constituencies and national government to achieve national connectivity. We conclude that, accepting the current lack of empirical evidence, the flexibility offered by the middle-out approach may make this the best initial national strategy.

AB - As governments commit to national electronic health record (EHR) systems, there is increasing international interest in identifying effective implementation strategies. We draw on Coiera's typology of national programmes - 'top-down', 'bottom-up' and 'middle-out' - to review EHR implementation strategies in three exemplar countries: England, the USA and Australia. In comparing and contrasting three approaches, we show how different healthcare systems, national policy contexts and anticipated benefits have shaped initial strategies. We reflect on progress and likely developments in the face of continually changing circumstances. Our review shows that irrespective of the initial strategy, over time there is likely to be convergence on the negotiated, devolved middle-out approach, which aims to balance the interests and responsibilities of local healthcare constituencies and national government to achieve national connectivity. We conclude that, accepting the current lack of empirical evidence, the flexibility offered by the middle-out approach may make this the best initial national strategy.

KW - electronic health records

KW - implementation

KW - information technology

KW - international approaches

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055116761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1260/2040-2295.2.1.25

DO - 10.1260/2040-2295.2.1.25

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 25

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Healthcare Engineering

JF - Journal of Healthcare Engineering

SN - 2040-2295

IS - 1

ER -