Abstract
Power-sharing is a leading institutional strategy for the management of ethnic conflict. Yet its performance is uneven. It often delivers a peace dividend: stopping violence, avoiding minority exclusion, and reducing group-based insecurity. Its decision-making efficiency and governance record, however, have weaker evaluations. We conceptualize ‘the power-sharing lifecycle’ to better understand the reasons for this uneven record. Exploring power-sharing performance through a lifecycle lens helps illuminate the experiences of – and potential for – power-sharing in the post-uprisings Arab world and beyond.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 109-116 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 1 Oct 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2020 |