Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management

Evidence from a survey in seven European countries

Diana Feliciano, Laura Bouriaud, Elodie Brahic, Philippe Deuffic, Zuzana Dobsinska, Vilem Jarsky, Anna Lawrence, Erlend Nybakk, Sonia Quiroga, Cristina Suarez, Andrej Ficko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Private forest owners’ involvement in forest management has been frequently examined through the attitudes, values, beliefs, objectives and motivations associated with owning and managing forestland. Owners’ views on forest management do not always align with those of policymakers who believe forest owners do not actively manage their forests. However, empirical studies on forest owners’ conceptualisations of forest management are scarce. To determine how private forest owners in Europe conceptualise forest management, a survey (n = 1,140) was undertaken in seven European countries (Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia and Romania). The owners were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 19 pre-tested statements defining forest management on a five-point Likert scale. Classification and regression trees were used to explain the major factors that influenced owners’ conceptualisations. Owners primarily conceptualised forest management as preserving forests for future generations and considered “a good business opportunity”, “an opportunity to earn additional money” or a “source of subsidies” less important. Their understanding of forest management as a mixture of forest maintenance, ecosystem stewardship and economic activity does not match with alleged policy makers’ views. Property size, age and Eastern/Western countries were the most relevant predictors of definitions of forest management. Small-scale forest owners from Western Europe considered ecosystem orientation more important, while owners from Eastern Europe considered economic aspects and forest maintenance more important. These differences might be associated with the socio-political system dynamics in Europe in the 20th century and changing values in post-modern society. Policymakers must be aware of the different forest management paradigms among forest owners in Eastern-Central and Western Europe when designing European forest policies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)162-176
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume54
Early online date8 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

forest management
management
evidence
private forest
ecosystem
political system
economic activity
Western Europe
Eastern Europe
value-orientation
Slovakia
economics
Slovenia
Romania
Czech Republic
Central Europe
Portugal
subsidy

Keywords

  • social representations
  • natural resource management
  • private forest owners
  • multi-functionality

Cite this

Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management : Evidence from a survey in seven European countries. / Feliciano, Diana; Bouriaud, Laura; Brahic, Elodie; Deuffic, Philippe; Dobsinska, Zuzana ; Jarsky, Vilem; Lawrence, Anna; Nybakk, Erlend; Quiroga, Sonia; Suarez, Cristina; Ficko, Andrej.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 54, 08.2017, p. 162-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feliciano, D, Bouriaud, L, Brahic, E, Deuffic, P, Dobsinska, Z, Jarsky, V, Lawrence, A, Nybakk, E, Quiroga, S, Suarez, C & Ficko, A 2017, 'Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries', Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 54, pp. 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016
Feliciano, Diana ; Bouriaud, Laura ; Brahic, Elodie ; Deuffic, Philippe ; Dobsinska, Zuzana ; Jarsky, Vilem ; Lawrence, Anna ; Nybakk, Erlend ; Quiroga, Sonia ; Suarez, Cristina ; Ficko, Andrej. / Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management : Evidence from a survey in seven European countries. In: Journal of Rural Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 54. pp. 162-176.
@article{9e7f032c782940e999f0b975dedd4646,
title = "Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: Evidence from a survey in seven European countries",
abstract = "Private forest owners’ involvement in forest management has been frequently examined through the attitudes, values, beliefs, objectives and motivations associated with owning and managing forestland. Owners’ views on forest management do not always align with those of policymakers who believe forest owners do not actively manage their forests. However, empirical studies on forest owners’ conceptualisations of forest management are scarce. To determine how private forest owners in Europe conceptualise forest management, a survey (n = 1,140) was undertaken in seven European countries (Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia and Romania). The owners were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 19 pre-tested statements defining forest management on a five-point Likert scale. Classification and regression trees were used to explain the major factors that influenced owners’ conceptualisations. Owners primarily conceptualised forest management as preserving forests for future generations and considered “a good business opportunity”, “an opportunity to earn additional money” or a “source of subsidies” less important. Their understanding of forest management as a mixture of forest maintenance, ecosystem stewardship and economic activity does not match with alleged policy makers’ views. Property size, age and Eastern/Western countries were the most relevant predictors of definitions of forest management. Small-scale forest owners from Western Europe considered ecosystem orientation more important, while owners from Eastern Europe considered economic aspects and forest maintenance more important. These differences might be associated with the socio-political system dynamics in Europe in the 20th century and changing values in post-modern society. Policymakers must be aware of the different forest management paradigms among forest owners in Eastern-Central and Western Europe when designing European forest policies.",
keywords = "social representations, natural resource management, private forest owners, multi-functionality",
author = "Diana Feliciano and Laura Bouriaud and Elodie Brahic and Philippe Deuffic and Zuzana Dobsinska and Vilem Jarsky and Anna Lawrence and Erlend Nybakk and Sonia Quiroga and Cristina Suarez and Andrej Ficko",
note = "Acknowledgements This paper is written as a part of Cost Action FP1201, Forest Land Ownership Changes in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy (FACESMAP). Laura Bouriaud thanks the Romanian Agency UEFISCDI for helping finance this research through the project PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0017. Philippe Deuffic and Elodie Brahic thank Centre National de la Propriete Forestiere (CNPF). The authors are also grateful to the people involved in data collection in the seven European countries. The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments that helped to improve the article.",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "162--176",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management

T2 - Evidence from a survey in seven European countries

AU - Feliciano, Diana

AU - Bouriaud, Laura

AU - Brahic, Elodie

AU - Deuffic, Philippe

AU - Dobsinska, Zuzana

AU - Jarsky, Vilem

AU - Lawrence, Anna

AU - Nybakk, Erlend

AU - Quiroga, Sonia

AU - Suarez, Cristina

AU - Ficko, Andrej

N1 - Acknowledgements This paper is written as a part of Cost Action FP1201, Forest Land Ownership Changes in Europe: Significance for Management and Policy (FACESMAP). Laura Bouriaud thanks the Romanian Agency UEFISCDI for helping finance this research through the project PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-0017. Philippe Deuffic and Elodie Brahic thank Centre National de la Propriete Forestiere (CNPF). The authors are also grateful to the people involved in data collection in the seven European countries. The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments that helped to improve the article.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Private forest owners’ involvement in forest management has been frequently examined through the attitudes, values, beliefs, objectives and motivations associated with owning and managing forestland. Owners’ views on forest management do not always align with those of policymakers who believe forest owners do not actively manage their forests. However, empirical studies on forest owners’ conceptualisations of forest management are scarce. To determine how private forest owners in Europe conceptualise forest management, a survey (n = 1,140) was undertaken in seven European countries (Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia and Romania). The owners were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 19 pre-tested statements defining forest management on a five-point Likert scale. Classification and regression trees were used to explain the major factors that influenced owners’ conceptualisations. Owners primarily conceptualised forest management as preserving forests for future generations and considered “a good business opportunity”, “an opportunity to earn additional money” or a “source of subsidies” less important. Their understanding of forest management as a mixture of forest maintenance, ecosystem stewardship and economic activity does not match with alleged policy makers’ views. Property size, age and Eastern/Western countries were the most relevant predictors of definitions of forest management. Small-scale forest owners from Western Europe considered ecosystem orientation more important, while owners from Eastern Europe considered economic aspects and forest maintenance more important. These differences might be associated with the socio-political system dynamics in Europe in the 20th century and changing values in post-modern society. Policymakers must be aware of the different forest management paradigms among forest owners in Eastern-Central and Western Europe when designing European forest policies.

AB - Private forest owners’ involvement in forest management has been frequently examined through the attitudes, values, beliefs, objectives and motivations associated with owning and managing forestland. Owners’ views on forest management do not always align with those of policymakers who believe forest owners do not actively manage their forests. However, empirical studies on forest owners’ conceptualisations of forest management are scarce. To determine how private forest owners in Europe conceptualise forest management, a survey (n = 1,140) was undertaken in seven European countries (Portugal, France, the United Kingdom, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Slovakia and Romania). The owners were asked to indicate their level of agreement with 19 pre-tested statements defining forest management on a five-point Likert scale. Classification and regression trees were used to explain the major factors that influenced owners’ conceptualisations. Owners primarily conceptualised forest management as preserving forests for future generations and considered “a good business opportunity”, “an opportunity to earn additional money” or a “source of subsidies” less important. Their understanding of forest management as a mixture of forest maintenance, ecosystem stewardship and economic activity does not match with alleged policy makers’ views. Property size, age and Eastern/Western countries were the most relevant predictors of definitions of forest management. Small-scale forest owners from Western Europe considered ecosystem orientation more important, while owners from Eastern Europe considered economic aspects and forest maintenance more important. These differences might be associated with the socio-political system dynamics in Europe in the 20th century and changing values in post-modern society. Policymakers must be aware of the different forest management paradigms among forest owners in Eastern-Central and Western Europe when designing European forest policies.

KW - social representations

KW - natural resource management

KW - private forest owners

KW - multi-functionality

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 162

EP - 176

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

ER -