Understanding the population consequences of disturbance

Enrico Pirotta (Corresponding Author), Cormac G. Booth, Daniel P. Costa, Erica Fleishman, Scott D. Kraus, David Lusseau, David Moretti, Leslie F. New, Robert S. Schick, Lisa K. Schwarz, Samantha E. Simmons, Len Thomas, Peter L. Tyack, Michael J. Weise, Randall S. Wells, John Harwood

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Managing the nonlethal effects of disturbance on wildlife populations has been a long‐term goal for decision makers, managers, and ecologists, and assessment of these effects is currently required by European Union and United States legislation. However, robust assessment of these effects is challenging. The management of human activities that have nonlethal effects on wildlife is a specific example of a fundamental ecological problem: how to understand the population‐level consequences of changes in the behavior or physiology of individual animals that are caused by external stressors. In this study, we review recent applications of a conceptual framework for assessing and predicting these consequences for marine mammal populations. We explore the range of models that can be used to formalize the approach and we identify critical research gaps. We also provide a decision tree that can be used to select the most appropriate model structure given the available data. Synthesis and applications: The implementation of this framework has moved the focus of discussion of the management of nonlethal disturbances on marine mammal populations away from a rhetorical debate about defining negligible impact and toward a quantitative understanding of long‐term population‐level effects. Here we demonstrate the framework's general applicability to other marine and terrestrial systems and show how it can support integrated modeling of the proximate and ultimate mechanisms that regulate trait‐mediated, indirect interactions in ecological communities, that is, the nonconsumptive effects of a predator or stressor on a species' behavior, physiology, or life history.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9934-9946
Number of pages13
JournalEcology and Evolution
Volume8
Issue number19
Early online date12 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2018

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • anthropogenic disturbance
  • environmental impact assessments
  • marine mammals
  • nonconsumptive effects
  • population consequences
  • trait-mediated indirect interactions
  • uncertainty

Cite this

Pirotta, E., Booth, C. G., Costa, D. P., Fleishman, E., Kraus, S. D., Lusseau, D., Moretti, D., New, L. F., Schick, R. S., Schwarz, L. K., Simmons, S. E., Thomas, L., Tyack, P. L., Weise, M. J., Wells, R. S., & Harwood, J. (2018). Understanding the population consequences of disturbance. Ecology and Evolution, 8(19), 9934-9946. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4458