Understandings of nature and grace in John Milbank and Thomas Aquinas

Michael Mawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

John Milbank is one of the most recent and arguably most radical proponents of an understanding of nature as graced. This article critically examines Milbank's understanding of nature and grace, specifically as elaborated within his reading of Thomas Aquinas. In the first part I outline Aquinas's most direct discussions of nature and grace in the Summa Theologica, drawing attention to several central, albeit subtle, distinctions that these contain. In the second and third parts, I examine Milbank's reading of Aquinas in Truth in Aquinas, and whether it adequately reflects and negotiates Aquinas's distinctions. On this basis I argue Milbank's reading, while drawing attention to some important and often neglected areas of Aquinas's thought, ultimately remains limited.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)347-361
Number of pages15
JournalScottish Journal of Theology
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Thomas Aquinas
John Milbank
Grace
Nature
Thought

Cite this

Understandings of nature and grace in John Milbank and Thomas Aquinas. / Mawson, Michael.

In: Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 62, No. 3, 08.2009, p. 347-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5a956fbd40a64f63a73c51bb38796342,
title = "Understandings of nature and grace in John Milbank and Thomas Aquinas",
abstract = "John Milbank is one of the most recent and arguably most radical proponents of an understanding of nature as graced. This article critically examines Milbank's understanding of nature and grace, specifically as elaborated within his reading of Thomas Aquinas. In the first part I outline Aquinas's most direct discussions of nature and grace in the Summa Theologica, drawing attention to several central, albeit subtle, distinctions that these contain. In the second and third parts, I examine Milbank's reading of Aquinas in Truth in Aquinas, and whether it adequately reflects and negotiates Aquinas's distinctions. On this basis I argue Milbank's reading, while drawing attention to some important and often neglected areas of Aquinas's thought, ultimately remains limited.",
author = "Michael Mawson",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0036930609004773",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "347--361",
journal = "Scottish Journal of Theology",
issn = "0036-9306",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understandings of nature and grace in John Milbank and Thomas Aquinas

AU - Mawson, Michael

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - John Milbank is one of the most recent and arguably most radical proponents of an understanding of nature as graced. This article critically examines Milbank's understanding of nature and grace, specifically as elaborated within his reading of Thomas Aquinas. In the first part I outline Aquinas's most direct discussions of nature and grace in the Summa Theologica, drawing attention to several central, albeit subtle, distinctions that these contain. In the second and third parts, I examine Milbank's reading of Aquinas in Truth in Aquinas, and whether it adequately reflects and negotiates Aquinas's distinctions. On this basis I argue Milbank's reading, while drawing attention to some important and often neglected areas of Aquinas's thought, ultimately remains limited.

AB - John Milbank is one of the most recent and arguably most radical proponents of an understanding of nature as graced. This article critically examines Milbank's understanding of nature and grace, specifically as elaborated within his reading of Thomas Aquinas. In the first part I outline Aquinas's most direct discussions of nature and grace in the Summa Theologica, drawing attention to several central, albeit subtle, distinctions that these contain. In the second and third parts, I examine Milbank's reading of Aquinas in Truth in Aquinas, and whether it adequately reflects and negotiates Aquinas's distinctions. On this basis I argue Milbank's reading, while drawing attention to some important and often neglected areas of Aquinas's thought, ultimately remains limited.

U2 - 10.1017/S0036930609004773

DO - 10.1017/S0036930609004773

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 347

EP - 361

JO - Scottish Journal of Theology

JF - Scottish Journal of Theology

SN - 0036-9306

IS - 3

ER -