Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment

Adrian Farcas, Paul M. Thompson, Nathan D. Merchant*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Assessment of underwater noise is increasingly required by regulators of development projects in marine and freshwater habitats, and noise pollution can be a constraining factor in the consenting process. Noise levels arising from the proposed activity are modelled and the potential impact on species of interest within the affected area is then evaluated. Although there is considerable uncertainty in the relationship between noise levels and impacts on aquatic species, the science underlying noise modelling is well understood. Nevertheless, many environmental impact assessments (EIAs) do not reflect best practice, and stakeholders and decision makers in the EIA process are often unfamiliar with the concepts and terminology that are integral to interpreting noise exposure predictions. In this paper, we review the process of underwater noise modelling and explore the factors affecting predictions of noise exposure. Finally, we illustrate the consequences of errors and uncertainties in noise modelling, and discuss future research needs to reduce uncertainty in noise assessments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-122
Number of pages9
JournalEnvironmental impact assessment review
Volume57
Early online date10 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016

Keywords

  • Noise
  • Marine mammals
  • Disturbance
  • Risk assessment
  • Acoustic modelling
  • Bioacoustics

Cite this

Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment. / Farcas, Adrian; Thompson, Paul M.; Merchant, Nathan D.

In: Environmental impact assessment review, Vol. 57, 02.2016, p. 114-122.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c801d7be27f640799e9534be7b7513fb,
title = "Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment",
abstract = "Assessment of underwater noise is increasingly required by regulators of development projects in marine and freshwater habitats, and noise pollution can be a constraining factor in the consenting process. Noise levels arising from the proposed activity are modelled and the potential impact on species of interest within the affected area is then evaluated. Although there is considerable uncertainty in the relationship between noise levels and impacts on aquatic species, the science underlying noise modelling is well understood. Nevertheless, many environmental impact assessments (EIAs) do not reflect best practice, and stakeholders and decision makers in the EIA process are often unfamiliar with the concepts and terminology that are integral to interpreting noise exposure predictions. In this paper, we review the process of underwater noise modelling and explore the factors affecting predictions of noise exposure. Finally, we illustrate the consequences of errors and uncertainties in noise modelling, and discuss future research needs to reduce uncertainty in noise assessments.",
keywords = "Noise, Marine mammals, Disturbance, Risk assessment, Acoustic modelling, Bioacoustics",
author = "Adrian Farcas and Thompson, {Paul M.} and Merchant, {Nathan D.}",
note = "Collection and analysis of data from the Cromarty Firth were funded through the DECC SEA Programme using equipment purchased with the support of Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd. We thank Tim Barton, Bill Ruck and Moray First Marine for fieldwork support in the Cromarty Firth. Sizewell data collection and analysis were funded by the EDF Energy New Nuclear Build marine studies programme. We thank Liam Fernand and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.012",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "114--122",
journal = "Environmental impact assessment review",
issn = "0195-9255",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment

AU - Farcas, Adrian

AU - Thompson, Paul M.

AU - Merchant, Nathan D.

N1 - Collection and analysis of data from the Cromarty Firth were funded through the DECC SEA Programme using equipment purchased with the support of Moray Offshore Renewables Ltd. We thank Tim Barton, Bill Ruck and Moray First Marine for fieldwork support in the Cromarty Firth. Sizewell data collection and analysis were funded by the EDF Energy New Nuclear Build marine studies programme. We thank Liam Fernand and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - Assessment of underwater noise is increasingly required by regulators of development projects in marine and freshwater habitats, and noise pollution can be a constraining factor in the consenting process. Noise levels arising from the proposed activity are modelled and the potential impact on species of interest within the affected area is then evaluated. Although there is considerable uncertainty in the relationship between noise levels and impacts on aquatic species, the science underlying noise modelling is well understood. Nevertheless, many environmental impact assessments (EIAs) do not reflect best practice, and stakeholders and decision makers in the EIA process are often unfamiliar with the concepts and terminology that are integral to interpreting noise exposure predictions. In this paper, we review the process of underwater noise modelling and explore the factors affecting predictions of noise exposure. Finally, we illustrate the consequences of errors and uncertainties in noise modelling, and discuss future research needs to reduce uncertainty in noise assessments.

AB - Assessment of underwater noise is increasingly required by regulators of development projects in marine and freshwater habitats, and noise pollution can be a constraining factor in the consenting process. Noise levels arising from the proposed activity are modelled and the potential impact on species of interest within the affected area is then evaluated. Although there is considerable uncertainty in the relationship between noise levels and impacts on aquatic species, the science underlying noise modelling is well understood. Nevertheless, many environmental impact assessments (EIAs) do not reflect best practice, and stakeholders and decision makers in the EIA process are often unfamiliar with the concepts and terminology that are integral to interpreting noise exposure predictions. In this paper, we review the process of underwater noise modelling and explore the factors affecting predictions of noise exposure. Finally, we illustrate the consequences of errors and uncertainties in noise modelling, and discuss future research needs to reduce uncertainty in noise assessments.

KW - Noise

KW - Marine mammals

KW - Disturbance

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Acoustic modelling

KW - Bioacoustics

U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2015.11.012

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 114

EP - 122

JO - Environmental impact assessment review

JF - Environmental impact assessment review

SN - 0195-9255

ER -