Unfulfilled expectations

How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices

Maureen Anne Porter, Siladitya Bhattacharya, Edwin Roland Van Teijlingen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Throughout Europe women are having fewer babies, but more of them are being delivered by caesarean section. There is some evidence that this major surgical procedure discourages women and/or their partners from having further children. This study is aimed at ascertaining the extent to which mode of delivery in first confinement affected women's decision-making about having another child. This paper reports results from (1) a questionnaire sent to 5300 women who delivered their first baby in Aberdeen in northeast Scotland between 1980 and 1995, but who did not have another viable pregnancy within 5 years, and (2) in-depth interviews with a stratified random sample of 82 of these respondents which covered experiences of birth, decision-making about subsequent pregnancies and infertility. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Questionnaires were returned by 3204 women (60%). Among those who had no further pregnancies, 1182 (71%) had deliberately limited their fertility. Of those who had a second child, 696 (66%) deliberately left a gap of 5 or more years between them. The factors which apparently influenced the decision to limit fertility included early intention, experience of the first, or index birth, health, lifestyle, influence of partner, age, first child and fertility problems. In interviews. women presented these factors as constraints on their behaviour, which restrained them from freely choosing to have more children and in some cases to have the number they had planned. As the decision to have only one child or to leave a large gap between children is unusual, women may have been presenting their choices in this way to make their actions appear more socially acceptable and their motivations as blameless. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1757-1767
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume62
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • decision-making
  • reproductive choices
  • mode of delivery
  • child spacing
  • narratives
  • birth experience
  • Cesarean-section
  • primary-mode
  • fertility
  • delivery
  • infertility
  • childbirth
  • involuntary
  • stigma
  • impact

Cite this

Unfulfilled expectations : How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices. / Porter, Maureen Anne; Bhattacharya, Siladitya; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 62, No. 7, 04.2006, p. 1757-1767.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Porter, Maureen Anne ; Bhattacharya, Siladitya ; Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland. / Unfulfilled expectations : How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices. In: Social Science & Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 62, No. 7. pp. 1757-1767.
@article{0f125ba4d3c144bc805c9068e0af1a70,
title = "Unfulfilled expectations: How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices",
abstract = "Throughout Europe women are having fewer babies, but more of them are being delivered by caesarean section. There is some evidence that this major surgical procedure discourages women and/or their partners from having further children. This study is aimed at ascertaining the extent to which mode of delivery in first confinement affected women's decision-making about having another child. This paper reports results from (1) a questionnaire sent to 5300 women who delivered their first baby in Aberdeen in northeast Scotland between 1980 and 1995, but who did not have another viable pregnancy within 5 years, and (2) in-depth interviews with a stratified random sample of 82 of these respondents which covered experiences of birth, decision-making about subsequent pregnancies and infertility. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Questionnaires were returned by 3204 women (60{\%}). Among those who had no further pregnancies, 1182 (71{\%}) had deliberately limited their fertility. Of those who had a second child, 696 (66{\%}) deliberately left a gap of 5 or more years between them. The factors which apparently influenced the decision to limit fertility included early intention, experience of the first, or index birth, health, lifestyle, influence of partner, age, first child and fertility problems. In interviews. women presented these factors as constraints on their behaviour, which restrained them from freely choosing to have more children and in some cases to have the number they had planned. As the decision to have only one child or to leave a large gap between children is unusual, women may have been presenting their choices in this way to make their actions appear more socially acceptable and their motivations as blameless. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Scotland, decision-making, reproductive choices, mode of delivery, child spacing, narratives, birth experience, Cesarean-section, primary-mode, fertility, delivery, infertility, childbirth, involuntary, stigma, impact",
author = "Porter, {Maureen Anne} and Siladitya Bhattacharya and {Van Teijlingen}, {Edwin Roland}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.047",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "1757--1767",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unfulfilled expectations

T2 - How circumstances impinge on women's reproductive choices

AU - Porter, Maureen Anne

AU - Bhattacharya, Siladitya

AU - Van Teijlingen, Edwin Roland

PY - 2006/4

Y1 - 2006/4

N2 - Throughout Europe women are having fewer babies, but more of them are being delivered by caesarean section. There is some evidence that this major surgical procedure discourages women and/or their partners from having further children. This study is aimed at ascertaining the extent to which mode of delivery in first confinement affected women's decision-making about having another child. This paper reports results from (1) a questionnaire sent to 5300 women who delivered their first baby in Aberdeen in northeast Scotland between 1980 and 1995, but who did not have another viable pregnancy within 5 years, and (2) in-depth interviews with a stratified random sample of 82 of these respondents which covered experiences of birth, decision-making about subsequent pregnancies and infertility. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Questionnaires were returned by 3204 women (60%). Among those who had no further pregnancies, 1182 (71%) had deliberately limited their fertility. Of those who had a second child, 696 (66%) deliberately left a gap of 5 or more years between them. The factors which apparently influenced the decision to limit fertility included early intention, experience of the first, or index birth, health, lifestyle, influence of partner, age, first child and fertility problems. In interviews. women presented these factors as constraints on their behaviour, which restrained them from freely choosing to have more children and in some cases to have the number they had planned. As the decision to have only one child or to leave a large gap between children is unusual, women may have been presenting their choices in this way to make their actions appear more socially acceptable and their motivations as blameless. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Throughout Europe women are having fewer babies, but more of them are being delivered by caesarean section. There is some evidence that this major surgical procedure discourages women and/or their partners from having further children. This study is aimed at ascertaining the extent to which mode of delivery in first confinement affected women's decision-making about having another child. This paper reports results from (1) a questionnaire sent to 5300 women who delivered their first baby in Aberdeen in northeast Scotland between 1980 and 1995, but who did not have another viable pregnancy within 5 years, and (2) in-depth interviews with a stratified random sample of 82 of these respondents which covered experiences of birth, decision-making about subsequent pregnancies and infertility. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically. Questionnaires were returned by 3204 women (60%). Among those who had no further pregnancies, 1182 (71%) had deliberately limited their fertility. Of those who had a second child, 696 (66%) deliberately left a gap of 5 or more years between them. The factors which apparently influenced the decision to limit fertility included early intention, experience of the first, or index birth, health, lifestyle, influence of partner, age, first child and fertility problems. In interviews. women presented these factors as constraints on their behaviour, which restrained them from freely choosing to have more children and in some cases to have the number they had planned. As the decision to have only one child or to leave a large gap between children is unusual, women may have been presenting their choices in this way to make their actions appear more socially acceptable and their motivations as blameless. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Scotland

KW - decision-making

KW - reproductive choices

KW - mode of delivery

KW - child spacing

KW - narratives

KW - birth experience

KW - Cesarean-section

KW - primary-mode

KW - fertility

KW - delivery

KW - infertility

KW - childbirth

KW - involuntary

KW - stigma

KW - impact

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.047

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.047

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 1757

EP - 1767

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 7

ER -